For starters, not just
absolute student test performance should be taken into account, but also how much students grow over the course of a year.
Not exact matches
The PISA 2015
test results have brought more bad news for Australia's education system with
student performances in scientific, reading and mathematical literacy all in «
absolute decline».
The monitoring of literacy and numeracy achievement against a set of
absolute proficiency levels would require a shift in thinking on the part of
students, teachers and parents who are used to interpreting
test performances only in terms of year level expectations.
Under the No Child Left Behind Act, schools are ranked by the trend, not the
absolute level, of their
students»
performance on the standardized reading and math
tests.
While U.S.
students»
performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
tests improved in
absolute terms between 1995 and 2011, U.S. progress was not sufficiently rapid to allow it to catch up with the leaders of the industrialized world.
The idea, roughly, is that one uses the
student's earlier
test score as a control for the later, so that one measures learning (that is, change across time) and not just
students»
absolute performance.
The 2010 program's «
absolute priority 1» required districts to set up
performance - based compensation systems tied closely — though exactly how closely was not specified — to
student growth as measured by
performance on standardized
tests.