Sentences with phrase «absolute valuation of the stock»

Not exact matches

After weeding out bad businesses the next needle (s) to pass is the parallel decision on if this good stock is also cheep judging from the absolute level of a number of valuation multiples and if the investor in the process of analyzing the qualities and inexpensiveness of the stock has been free from biases.

In the process of scanning the investment landscape to find value amidst the all time highs for the indices, I've noticed that a number of big cap tech stocks are priced at low valuations relative to their earnings and free cash flow, measured on an absolute basis and relative to their own historical valuations.

Relative valuation of stocks is a good alternative to the absolute valuation.

When implementing this strategy, you simply need to look for stocks with a low absolute share price, regardless of it's valuation (meaning a stock selling at $ 20.00 is better than a stock selling at $ 50.00, all else being equal — valuation still matters).

Sure, we could while away the hours debating & agonising over that... but in absolute terms, all stocks (regardless of valuation) present some inescapable level of unquantifiable potential downside risk.

Stock valuations are never absolute — it is always a question of the other assets you are measuring the stocks against, and how you desirable those other assets will be in the future, and how sustainable the profitability of stocks will be over time.

A bunch of fundamentally solid funds have been hammered by their absolute value orientation; that is, their refusal to buy stocks when they believe that the stock's valuations and the underlying corporation's prospects simply do not offer a sufficient margin of safety for the risks they're taking, much less compelling opportunities.

I think it's hard too when considering a single stock since it's absolute; e.g. if comparing Stock A which is considered overvalued with Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&rstock since it's absolute; e.g. if comparing Stock A which is considered overvalued with Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&rStock A which is considered overvalued with Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&rStock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&rStock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&rStock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&rstock available?»

Returning to asset managers, % of AUM is the key absolute valuation metric, and I believe Price / Sales (based on operating profit margins) is the best stock specific valuation ratio.

-- Regardless of my thoughts on valuation, it was perhaps inevitable the absolute & relative performance of the TGISVP Portfolios would be dominated each year by resource stocks.

The alternative, of course, is to sit down & re-survey the listed German property sector, in the hopes of finding another KWG... i.e. a still relatively undiscovered stock / company that offers an attractive relative / absolute valuation and / or prospective NAV growth!?

But frankly speaking, this is an over-simplified way of seeing whether the stock market is over-valued or not, and I'm not even done with talking about absolute valuation nor begun to talk about relative valuation.

In this 15 January 2008 article The Dash To Trash And The Grab For Growth James Montier wrote just shortly after the absolute peak in the 2008 bull market he suggests that if you can not move to cash because of career risk then invest in large dividend paying companies as what is going to happen to growth stocks at already high valuations is not going to be pretty.