Not exact matches
Personally, I'm more
of a
value investor and
absolute return investor and will buy
stocks that seem more likely than not to have a place in the portfolio.
The electric vehicle maker is another high priced
stock (
absolute, not a reflection
of value) that attracts a wide array
of speculators.
This is lower volatility than many other
stocks in percentage terms, but because
of the high
stock price (
absolute, not a reflection
of value) the moves are large in
absolute dollar terms.
We argued that the market had experienced a multi-year process
of de-rating, as
stock prices languished while corporate cash flows and book
values had multiplied, and had become inexpensive in
absolute and relative terms.
The Magic Formula diverges from Graham's strategy by exchanging for Graham's
absolute price and quality measures (i.e. price - to - earnings ratio below 10, and debt - to - equity ratio below 50 percent) a ranking system that seeks those
stocks with the best combination
of price and quality more akin to Buffett's
value investing philosophy.
I concluded that the
absolute value of corporate earnings does not consistently lead the
stock market in a previous study.
(US Wide Moat
Stocks Pros) I can ensure each purchase is under -
valued in terms
of absolute value, so I can avoid over-paying.
In the process
of scanning the investment landscape to find
value amidst the all time highs for the indices, I've noticed that a number
of big cap tech
stocks are priced at low valuations relative to their earnings and free cash flow, measured on an
absolute basis and relative to their own historical valuations.
Ryanair and Irish Continental (IR5A: ID) don't offer enough upside, tanker
stocks are an
absolute disaster, and coach / rail / cruise - line
stocks don't seem so compelling — it's a riskier
stock, but Dart Group (DTG: LN) has potential, and has been on my Potential Buy list for a long time... And it's caught plenty
of blogger's eyes recently: kelpiecapital, Expecting
Value, Richard Beddard, valuestockinquisition, Valuhunteruk.
I may not have exotic tail risk hedged out the wazoo, or try to necessarily bet against the idiotic & irrational, but my goal is to consistently seek out
stocks, markets & asset classes which (ideally) offer the most attractive risk / reward equation, in terms
of absolute value (not relative
value).
The
stock market moves up and down based on whether earnings (
absolute value of earnings, not GROWTH) are increasing or decreasing.
It's an understandable move: the fund has an
absolute value focus, there are durned few deeply discounted small cap
stocks currently and so cash has built up to become 60 %
of the portfolio.
The executive's high tax bracket and substantial NUA, both in
absolute terms and as a percentage
of her company
stock's market
value, enabled the NUA rule to produce considerable tax savings.
A bunch
of fundamentally solid funds have been hammered by their
absolute value orientation; that is, their refusal to buy
stocks when they believe that the
stock's valuations and the underlying corporation's prospects simply do not offer a sufficient margin
of safety for the risks they're taking, much less compelling opportunities.
I think it's hard too when considering a single
stock since it's absolute; e.g. if comparing Stock A which is considered overvalued with Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&r
stock since it's
absolute; e.g. if comparing
Stock A which is considered overvalued with Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&r
Stock A which is considered overvalued with
Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example, Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&r
Stock B which is considered undervalued; in the same timeframe as your example,
Stock B could have increased more than the 16 % of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&r
Stock B could have increased more than the 16 %
of Stock A. For me, that would be the point of the valuation, to force the question «is another better valued stock available?&r
Stock A. For me, that would be the point
of the valuation, to force the question «is another better
valued stock available?&r
stock available?»
There are at least three ways
of doing that: making bets that the market or particular sectors or securities will fall (long / short equity), shifting assets from overvalued asset classes to undervalued ones (flexible portfolios) or selling
stocks as they become overvalued and holding the proceeds in cash until
stocks become undervalued again (
absolute value investing).
On Wednesday, February 7, dollar
value traded in U.S. - listed ETFs represented more than 35 %
of the consolidated tape (compared with an average
of 26 % in 2017).5 The rise in ETF turnover on both an
absolute and relative basis to broad equities amid the significant market volatility implies investors and traders chose ETFs over single
stocks.