Sentences with phrase «absolutely know climates»
If anything we absolutely know climates change and modern humans need to face that reality with solid engineering approaches as we continue to progress.
http://www.globalclimatescam.com/ Not exact matches
Friedman: Absolutely, because without it, if we aren't Noah and we don't build the ark, we could — and I think this is so important for our Scientific American's audience to really understand, because I know they appreciate it — and that is that we could actually save the climate and kill the planet.
I think there's absolutely no doubt that climate change is a problem.
He says scientists «now don't know if they have global warming» when there is absolutely zero doubt, even among scientists who are unconvinced climate change poses a major threat, that the planet is warming up.
Wow, it is quite embarrassing of you to come on a site hosted by peer - reviewed (you know, one of the foundations of all science) climate scientists when you have absolutely no clue about the scientific method.
It is another red - herring being used by interest groups to further another absolutely useless debate which we all know as «is climate change real» and «are humans causing this?».
InsideClimate News (ICN) has insisted over and over that the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF) and the Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF), which have been bankrolling the entire #ExxonKnew campaign, have absolutely no editorial authority over the stories they publish, including the series they released last year proclaiming that Exxon «knew» about climate change in the 1970s before climate scientists even understood the data.
However, I notice that none of the denizens of Climate Etc. who are proponents of CAGW have challenged my claim that «we know that there is absolutely no empirical data whatsoever to support this hypothesis (CAGW)?»
You state well the non-national basis of the AGW movement: humans cause climate change, therefor anything the AGW movement demands, no matter how ineffectual or self - serving, is what absolutely must be done.
What we don't know is the absolutely sensitivity of the climate to the increased CO2, which will be determined by the associated feedbacks.
=== > Fifth, we know that the $ billion $ super computer climate models used by these same scientists are fatally flawed, thus absolutely worthless regarding future global and regional climate predictions...
What these people haven't yet grasped is that this line of argument — that there is absolutely no doubt what impacts a changing climate will bring and they are all terrible bad impacts — has likely driven the highest number of people questioning the entire field than any other single issue.
The trick in the post, as with virtually ALL of climate science, is that we don't havea frigging clue about the natural variability of the climate, so we absolutely don't know what is «unprecedented.»
Knowing that abrupt and frequent climate changes attend the end extreme interglacials, and accepting your premise that CO2 can either cause warming by whatever process you propose, or ameliorate the drop to the glacial state, applying the Precautionary Principle absolutely requires that we avoid any possibility of climate back - sliding over the next, at least, 4,000 years:
And again, you operate completely on arguments from ignorance - as if we absolutely know everything about the climate.
Anyone who knows this could have made the same «prediction», and it says absolutely nothing about the Met Office's ability to make statements about climate change which are consistent with reality.
We have gained much more understanding of what climate change could mean for the world, so creating a document that encompasses absolutely everything we know is longer and more tedious.
A two - track climate strategy is needed: «We absolutely need to reduce greenhouse - gas emissions, but we also have to adapt to the impacts we can no longer prevent,» Sims says.