Sentences with phrase «absorb more heat from»

Not only will melting Arctic sea ice raise global sea levels, it will also allow the earth to absorb more heat from the sun because ice reflects the sun's rays while blue open water absorbs it.

Dark surfaces absorb more heat from the sun.

The increasing greenhouse effect leads to a radiation imbalance: we absorb more heat from the sun than we emit back into space.

Dark - colored bowls will absorb more heat from the sun than lighter ones.

That widespread melting leaves huge swaths of dark ocean water that absorbs more heat from the sun than the white, reflective sea ice it replaces.

Its two faces differ strikingly in color, likely the result of thermal segregation: Over time, darker materials (like carbon) have absorbed more heat from the sun, warming up and sending lighter, more volatile materials (like ice) to the colder hemisphere.

Conversely, when there is less Arctic sea ice, the ocean absorbs more heat from the sun, adding to global warming.

Another positive feedback of global warming is the albedo effect: less white summer ice means more dark open water, which absorbs more heat from the sun.

The UP is not only absorbing more heat from below, but we've added an IR emitter, CO2, to the UP layers, and so it can rid itself of more heat.»

When ice melts it reveals darker Arctic Ocean water, which in turn absorbs more heat from the sun, further heating the region.

Darker than the snow and ice, this debris absorbs more heat from the sun than its surroundings and causes the ice underneath to melt into cylindrical holes up to about a foot deep.

The darkness of land and water compared with the reflectiveness of snow and ice means that when the latter melt to reveal the former, the area exposed absorbs more heat from the sun and reflects less of it back into space.

Not exact matches

Note: If using a dark colored pan, reduce the oven temperature, stated in the recipe, by 25 degrees F. (This is because dark colored pans absorb more of the energy coming from the oven walls so they become hotter and transmit heat faster than light colored pans.)

As a final note, if you cover the milk after heating it and let it sit for 10 minutes, covered, it will absorb more bouquet from the vanilla bean.

As the climate changes, Southern Ocean upwelling may increase, which could accelerate ice shelf melting, release more carbon into the atmosphere and limit the ocean's ability to absorb heat and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

For example, photonic crystals could funnel excess heat from a power plant's generator and release it over a much smaller band of frequencies to drive engines — such as those in electric - powered cars that can absorb energy only within a small range — much more efficiently.

The whiter the ice, the more reflective it is, and the less heat it absorbs from the sun.

The coat radiates more heat to the cold sky than it absorbs from its surroundings, the team reports, causing the temperature to drop below that of the surrounding air, while thick insulation reduces body heat loss from the skin.

That means the surface absorbs far more heat from the sun, instead of reflecting light back into space.

Dogs with dark coats will absorb heat from the sun, and suffer more from the effects of hot weather.

Heatstroke occurs when a dog's body either produces through exercise or absorbs from the environment more heat than it can dissipate.

Away from the dense network of heat absorbing (daytime) then heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experieheat absorbing (daytime) then heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experieheat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experieHeat Island and above the air with high water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much more like what the natural countryside would experience.

There are subtle effects such as the planet losing more heat from the open sea than from ice - covered region (some of this heat is absorbed by the atmosphere, but climates over ice - covered regions are of more continental winter character: dry and cold).

Actually, though, most of the OLR originates from below the tropopause (can get up around 18 km in the tropics, generally lower)-- with a majority of solar radiation absorbed at the surface, a crude approximation can be made that the area emitting to space is less than 2 * (20/6371) * 100 % ~ = 0.628 % more than the area heated by the sun, so the OLR per unit area should be well within about 0.6 % of the value calculated without the Earth's curvature (I'm guessing it would actually be closer to if not less than 0.3 % different).

To summarize this concept, do you agree that when a layer's temperature is due to heat absorbed by CO2 alone, more CO2 will increase the temperature, whereas if the temperature includes heating from something else as well, more CO2 can help rid the layer of that extra heat?

According to the scientist conducting the study, the soot — which comes from the Chindia belt, as well as the Western world — and which is black, absorbs heat from the sun more readilly than white ice, thereby accelerating the warming and melting of the glaciers even more than the Greenhouse effect.

Among the possible excuses offered by the UN's supposed experts for the lack of warming: «ash from volcanoes,» a «decline in heat from the sun,» or more heat being «absorbed by the deep oceans.»

In the Arctic, the tipping points identified in the new report, published on Friday, include: growth in vegetation on tundra, which replaces reflective snow and ice with darker vegetation, thus absorbing more heat; higher releases of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from the tundra as it warms; shifts in snow distribution that warm the ocean, resulting in altered climate patterns as far away as Asia, where the monsoon could be effected; and the collapse of some key Arctic fisheries, with knock - on effects on ocean ecosystems around the globe.»

Note, for example, how the temperature trend in the first decade of the 21st century was generally flat because an upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the oceans absorbed more heat than usual from the atmosphere (sea water temperatures continued to rise).»

Loss of sea ice means more heat from the sun is absorbed by the ocean surface, adding to Arctic warming.

For example, the scientific explanation that temperatures have not risen since 2001 is because an «upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the oceans absorbed more heat than usual from the atmosphere (sea water temperatures continued to rise)».

Thanks to their large heat capacity, the oceans absorb warming caused by human activities, and more than 90 % of the Earth's extra heat from global warming is absorbed by them.

More recently, scientists have been surprised to learn that black carbon — not only from biomass fires but from dirty diesel engines and other sources — is a far larger contributor to global warming than previously suspected: The dark particles absorb and retain heat close to the Earth's surface that might otherwise be reflected.

A leaked draft of the next major climate report from the U.N. cites numerous causes to explain the slowdown in warming: greater - than - expected ash from volcanoes, a decline in heat from the sun, more heat being absorbed by the deep oceans, and so on.

According to the BBC, the draft IPCC report suggests that the oceans have been absorbing more heat than expected, in effect insulating global surface temperatures from greater change.

Some of the accumulated heat will be released into the air above, the equilibrium has been disrupted, cooler surface, followed by more heat absorbing from the source above, and so on, result surface temperature oscillation (the AMO).

But if a little more energy is absorbed, then CO2 is acting like a little black soot in the atmosphere and it will, in turn, radiate more toward space as a black box would from the added heat and this might compensate for the change in albedo.

Bill Gray has a favorite diagram, taken from a 1985 climate model, showing little nodules in the center with such labels as «thermal inertia» and «net energy balance» and «latent heat flux» and «subsurface heat storage» and «absorbed heat radiation» and so on, and they are emitting arrows that curve and loop in all directions, bumping into yet more jargon, like «soil moisture» and «surface roughness» and «vertical wind» and «meltwater» and «volcanoes.»

From latitudes 40 ° North or South to the poles, the earth increasingly ventilates more heat than it absorbs.

9 Increasing greenhouse gases trap more heat «Greenhouse effect» Increasing greenhouse gases trap more heat [Image 1] Earth's surface absorbs heat from the sun and then re-radiates it back into the atmosphere and to space.

To be energy or more properly, heat transferred, the one - way upwelling radiation from the surface absorbed by the air should be reduced by subtraction of the down - welling radiation of the air absorbed by the surface Note that by subtraction of the (about 20 W / m ² in global average) flow surface to cosmos of both terms of GH, GH expression becomes GH = (radiation from the surface absorbed by the air) minus (outgoing longwave radiation from the air) which has absolutely no physical sense!

CO2 and H2O vapour emit vastly more heat than they absorb because they are somewhere between +30 C and -55 C, depending on the height, and deep space is about -270 C, as always the heat flows from hot to cold, the bigger the temperature gradient the greater the heat flow.

Since those 15 micron photons are impacting a surface that is already radiating away from the hugely more massive surface (speaking at molecular level) those photons will be absorbed and radiated out again because the heat store just below the molecular surface is at a higher energy potential.

If more DLR from more CO2 enters the skin layer, less heat from absorbed SWR will need to flow upwards, and the ocean will get warmer.

This means the Earth absorbed more energy from solar radiation than it emitted as heat back to space.

More likely the oceans on our 70 % water covered world, which absorb heat energy from the sun (for which we have some data), and geothermal energy (for which we have virtually no data), and release it over long periods of time by poorly understood mechanisms that are possibly the real driving force behind climate.

The gas which absorbs the most heat (infrared radiation) is the most effective greenhouse gas as in the atmosphere it would absorb more infrared coming from the Earth's surface.

While the location of the hottest place on Earth might shift from year to year, the conditions that give rise to it remain the same: Dry, rocky and dark - colored lands are good at absorbing heat, while lighter sand will tend to reflect more sunlight.

Not to mention, why do skeptics continue to ignore, dismiss, or simply «argue with» by any means possible, the far more important fact that most of the increased absorbed heat energy is going into warming the oceans, not the atmosphere (thus keeping the ambient air temp rise from registering as high as it otherwise would, and impacting FUTURE climate far more).

(BTW, the skeptics like to game the Beer's Law thing — «existing CO2 already absorbs all the IR from the ground» — forgetting that absorbed heat has to be re-emitted, and more CO2 shifts up the equilibrium temperature.