If they continue through the intestines at a leisurely pace, your little one's body has enough time to
absorb more water from them, so what comes out may be quite firm.
And other things I've read say that brown rice
absorbs more water from your body, so it fills you up quicker.
Not exact matches
Since the 2tbsp grows 12 x because it
absorbs the
water, it will last a lot longer and you will be getting a great deal
more benefit
from them.
I'm trying to eat as much as I can because of its nutritional benefits: — they can help your diet by making you feel full (it's because they
absorb 10 times their weight in
water, forming a bulky gel)-- they are the richest plant source of Omega - 3 — chia seeds slow down how fast our bodies convert carbohydrates into simple sugars, studies indicate they can control blood sugar — they are an excellent source of fiber, with a whopping 10 grams in only 2 tablespoons — chia seeds are rich in antioxidants that help protect the body
from free radicals, aging and cancer — chia seeds contain no gluten or grains — the outer layer of chia seeds swells when mixed with liquids to form a gel (this can used in place of eggs to lower cholesterol and increase the nutrient content of foods and baked goods)(
More info here.)
That widespread melting leaves huge swaths of dark ocean
water that
absorbs more heat
from the sun than the white, reflective sea ice it replaces.
Another positive feedback of global warming is the albedo effect: less white summer ice means
more dark open
water, which
absorbs more heat
from the sun.
Some sources of
water can contain hundreds of chemicals and many of these chemicals can be
more easily
absorbed from water than
from food.
The rice is unique in that it
absorbs the arsenic
from the soil or
from the
water a lot
more efficiently than most of the plants do.
Notably, carbon dioxide
from the air is rapidly
absorbed, making the
water acidic and even
more aggressive.
Set 3 - 4 tablespoon of chia seeds in a small bowl of
water and place in the refrigerator for 2 - 24 hours (the longer they're soaking the
more chia goodness will get
absorbed from them).
Features two types of Vitamin C: a
water - soluble vitamin C derivative that
absorbs quickly for an immediate glow and an oil - soluble vitamin C derivative that remains in skin longer, providing antioxidant protection
from UV damage for brighter,
more even toned skin over time.
You can
absorb it by drinking poorly filtered tap
water or straight
from the tap,
from taking showers and especially
from taking baths because we
absorb more stuff
from water when we're immersed in it.
In addition, since like any fibre psyllium husks
absorb water from intestines it requires
more water intake in between meals as otherwise it may cause severe constipation!
I'm trying to eat as much as I can because of its nutritional benefits: — they can help your diet by making you feel full (it's because they
absorb 10 times their weight in
water, forming a bulky gel)-- they are the richest plant source of Omega - 3 — chia seeds slow down how fast our bodies convert carbohydrates into simple sugars, studies indicate they can control blood sugar — they are an excellent source of fiber, with a whopping 10 grams in only 2 tablespoons — chia seeds are rich in antioxidants that help protect the body
from free radicals, aging and cancer — chia seeds contain no gluten or grains — the outer layer of chia seeds swells when mixed with liquids to form a gel (this can used in place of eggs to lower cholesterol and increase the nutrient content of foods and baked goods)(
More info here.)
The
more chemicals you inhale
from your phthalate - filled fragrance or
absorb from your paraben - filled lotion, the
more the
water rises.
Away
from the dense network of heat
absorbing (daytime) then heat radiating (nighttime) structures which is the Urban Heat Island and above the air with high
water vapor content trapped by the valley along the river, not to mention the pall of coal dust over the city, morning low temps were much
more like what the natural countryside would experience.
Warming must occur below the tropopause to increase the net LW flux out of the tropopause to balance the tropopause - level forcing; there is some feedback at that point as the stratosphere is «forced» by the fraction of that increase which it
absorbs, and a fraction of that is transfered back to the tropopause level — for an optically thick stratosphere that could be significant, but I think it may be minor for the Earth as it is (while CO2 optical thickness of the stratosphere alone is large near the center of the band, most of the wavelengths in which the stratosphere is not transparent have a
more moderate optical thickness on the order of 1 (mainly
from stratospheric
water vapor; stratospheric ozone makes a contribution over a narrow wavelength band, reaching somewhat larger optical thickness than stratospheric
water vapor)(in the limit of an optically thin stratosphere at most wavelengths where the stratosphere is not transparent, changes in the net flux out of the stratosphere caused by stratospheric warming or cooling will tend to be evenly split between upward at TOA and downward at the tropopause; with greater optically thickness over a larger fraction of optically - significant wavelengths, the distribution of warming or cooling within the stratosphere will affect how such a change is distributed, and it would even be possible for stratospheric adjustment to have opposite effects on the downward flux at the tropopause and the upward flux at TOA).
Cold
water may hold
more CO2, but the amount it
absorbs from the air depends on how saturated it already is.
Craig (1957a), p. 2; for the large number («the surface
waters can
absorb only a small fraction of the extra CO2 in a period of several hundred years»), see Plass (1956), p. 149; the small number was
from Dingle (1954), who used an 1899 measurement of
water mixed with ordinary salt, which behaves very differently
from the
more chemically complicated sea
water.
When ice melts it reveals darker Arctic Ocean
water, which in turn
absorbs more heat
from the sun, further heating the region.
Enhanced
water vapor
absorbs more incoming sunlight and reflection
from snow and ice declines.
When the ocean
absorbs CO2
from the air, not only does that CO2 increase the temperature of the
water, and cause
more ice melt, but it also causes ocean acidification.
Ice as polystyrene full of air was insulating the
water from the winter coldness — minus ice;
water absorbs extra coldness — in combination of the coldness
from the air and extra coldness in the
water = that double coldness as ripples goes south — intercepts 95 % INSTEAD OF 50 % of the moisture and is dropping it in Europe / USA — end result: SOUTH MUCH
MORE SNOW AND COLDNESS — NO MOISTURE TO REPLENISH THE ICE DEFICIT ON ARCTIC.
Note, for example, how the temperature trend in the first decade of the 21st century was generally flat because an upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the oceans
absorbed more heat than usual
from the atmosphere (sea
water temperatures continued to rise).»
For example, the scientific explanation that temperatures have not risen since 2001 is because an «upward push by anthropogenic forces was temporarily offset by a downward pull as solar activity decreased and the oceans
absorbed more heat than usual
from the atmosphere (sea
water temperatures continued to rise)».
The lack of»
water vapor» is, because: it was
more water in Arctic ocean without ice cover as» insulation» - >
water absorbed extra coldness and the currents brought extra coldness in North Atlantic = above the ocean is colder = less evaporation - > less
water vapor produced - > less moisture going west
from central Atlantic.
The darkness of land and
water compared with the reflectiveness of snow and ice means that when the latter melt to reveal the former, the area exposed
absorbs more heat
from the sun and reflects less of it back into space.
Surface
waters above Arctic methane seeps
absorbed 2,000 times
more carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere than the amount of methane that escaped into the atmosphere
from the same
waters.
Basically, Dr Ferenc Miskolczi's life as a NASA climate research scientist was made hell because he discovered that the extra
water vapour being evaporated is not having a positive - feedback (increasing the CO2 warming effect by
absorbing more infrared
from the sun), instead it is going into increased cloud cover, which reflects incoming sunlight back to space.
In the real world, the
water vapour transparency window (8µm to 12 µm) may bring some reduction in the radiation of the air
absorbed by the surface with respect to the radiation of the surface
absorbed by the air; nevertheless F. Miskolczi a
from hundreds of profiles (Tiros Initial Guess Retrieval) shown with line by line calculation that it is still true that the radiation of the air
absorbed by the surface equals (
more or less) the radiation of the surface
absorbed by the air; and clouds «close the window» for a quite significant part or the time.
And the
more CO2 they «eat» (
absorb from the air or
water), the bigger and better they grow.
Not only will melting Arctic sea ice raise global sea levels, it will also allow the earth to
absorb more heat
from the sun because ice reflects the sun's rays while blue open
water absorbs it.
For example, in a warmer climate,
more water vapor is evaporated into the atmosphere and since
water vapor is a greenhouse gas in the sense of
absorbing IR radiation, this is a positive feedback, in essence increasing the W / m ^ 2
from that due to CO2 alone.
Cold
water from depth can hold
more carbon dioxide then the tropical surface
water does and will start
absorbing carbon dioxide
from the air as the prevailing winds blow over it.
More likely the oceans on our 70 %
water covered world, which
absorb heat energy
from the sun (for which we have some data), and geothermal energy (for which we have virtually no data), and release it over long periods of time by poorly understood mechanisms that are possibly the real driving force behind climate.
2) We have INCREASING POSITIVE feedback effects
from (a) melting tundra, (b) melting melting hydrates in the oceans, (c) lower reflectivity (albedo) of the Arctic itself, not to mention its next door neighbor Greenland, (d) increased fires in northern Asia and North America which will further exacerbate albedo, (e) LESS ICE AREA to reflect sun in the Arctic... and thus allow that nice dark
water to
absorb more and
more sun.
Is there any likelihood a bloom of plankton (
from a freshwater pulse, or fallout of a dust cloud full of minerals, for example) would change the temperature of the surface
water (change the reflectivity, I suppose, or change how much is
absorbed by making
more complicated molecules for photosynthesis)-- sufficient to make the
water mass density change, affecting whether it sinks or not?
Doesn't that then mean that there are no
more photons to be
absorbed by the added
water vapor produced as a result of the added heat
from the CO2 associated warming?
Ocean acidity is rising as sea
water absorbs more carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere
from power plants and automobiles.
I can imagine two explanations: 1) Scotty is beaming
water molecules into the attic every morning and beaming them back out every afternoon at the exact rates to mimic a capacitance charge - discharge curve; 2) or,
more likely but less entertaining, the
water molecules are going
from the ad and
absorbed state in the exposed porous materials into the attic air in morning as the sun hits the roofing materials and drives
water vapor out of the sheathing, rafters, open cell foam into the attic air.