Satellite retrievals [of SST] in aerosol - contaminated regions are biased low because the infrared radiation from the surface is
absorbed by the aerosol and the reemitted at the lower temperature of the aerosol
Not exact matches
This year, Summit's list of long - term visitors includes Brandon Strellis, an environmental engineering graduate student from the Georgia Institute of Technology studying how
aerosols influence how much energy is reflected and
absorbed by Greenland's ice — and where those particles are coming from.
Scientists can measure how much energy greenhouse gases now add (roughly three watts per square meter), but what eludes precise definition is how much other factors — the response of clouds to warming, the cooling role of
aerosols, the heat and gas
absorbed by oceans, human transformation of the landscape, even the natural variability of solar strength — diminish or strengthen that effect.
By absorbing heat,
aerosols can evaporate nearby cloud droplets — making the cloud less reflective and compounding the heating effect.
Soot particles, also known as black carbon
aerosols, affect climate
by absorbing sunlight, which warms the surrounding air and limits the amount of solar radiation that reaches the ground.
That's the conclusion of a team of scientists using a new approach to study tiny atmospheric particles called
aerosols that can influence climate
by absorbing or reflecting sunlight and seeding clouds.
-- As used in this section, the term «black carbon» means primary light
absorbing aerosols, as defined
by the Administrator, based on the best available science.
Thus
by mixing the two
aerosol components you end up with an overall more
absorbing aerosol (higher positive forcing) than when the two
aerosol types are externally mixed in their pure forms.
Why It Matters:
Aerosols, tiny airborne particles of dust and pollution suspended in the atmosphere, affect the atmosphere and the surface of Earth
by scattering and
absorbing light.
These components — specifically
aerosols (particulates in the air — dust, soot, sulphates, nitrates, pollen etc.) and atmospheric chemistry (ozone, methane)-- are both affected
by climate and affect climate, since
aerosols and ozone can interact,
absorb, reflect or scatter solar and thermal radiation.
Undersea volcanoes could not produce this effect because the dust and
aerosols would be
absorbed by the sea before they reached the atmosphere.
Current growth in forcings is dominated
by increasing CO2, with potentially a small role for decreases in reflective
aerosols (sulphates, particularly in the US and EU) and increases in
absorbing aerosols (like soot, particularly from India and China and from biomass burning).
I was thinking instead perhaps more easily controlled polar - orbit satellites might be used, which would rotate with some fixed ratio to their orbital period, casting greater shadows at higher latitudes... or some other arrangment... for a targetted offset polar amplification of AGW especially and in particular perhaps avoiding the reduction in precipitation that can be caused
by SW - radiation - based «GE» (although
aerosols that actually
absorb some SW in the troposphere while shielding the surface would have the worst effect in that way, I'd think)... strategic distribution of solar shading has been suggested with precipitation effects in mind, such as here... sorry, I don't have the link (I'm sure I saved it, just as Steve Fish would suggest — but where?).
This includes the energy trapped
by photosynthesis, the majority that is not re-radiated, plus energy that is prevented from re-radiating back
by reflecting from cloud cover or
aerosols,
absorbed by GHGs, and other mechanisms.
Aerosols directly affect the climate
by scattering and
absorbing radiation, and indirectly affect climate
by altering cloud radiative properties, duration and amount.
Meanwhile, other types of
aerosols, often produced
by burning fossil fuels, can change surface temperatures
by either reflecting or
absorbing incoming sunlight.
Formation of nitrogen - and sulfur - containing light -
absorbing compounds accelerated
by evaporation of water from secondary organic
aerosols
-- As used in this section, the term «black carbon» means primary light
absorbing aerosols, as defined
by the Administrator, based on the best available science.
Aerosol particles affect the Earth's radiative balance
by directly scattering and
absorbing solar radiation and, indirectly, through their activation into cloud droplets.
Over the last century, tiny airborne particles called
aerosols, which cool the climate
by absorbing and reflecting sunlight, have largely cancelled out the effects of GHG emissions on tropical storm intensity, according to a new scientific review paper published in Science journal.
All
absorbed radiation must be returned to space, except for very minor imbalances (e.g., of the order of currently estimated 0.9 W / ^ 2) during forcing
by CO2, solar changes,
aerosols, or other climate drivers.
Important values related to
aerosol are the total Incoming Solar Radiation (insolation)(342 Wm - 2), the 67 Wm - 2
Absorbed by the Atmosphere, and 77 Wm - 2 Reflected
by Clouds,
Aerosols, and Atmosphere.
Tropospheric
aerosols play a crucial role in climate and can cause a climate forcing directly
by absorbing and reflecting sunlight, thereby cooling or heating the atmosphere, and indirectly
by modifying cloud properties.
Shortwave radiation modulators such as clouds and
aerosols (albedo) are the dominant determinants of how much heat is
absorbed by the oceans.
Aerosols may influence climate in several ways: directly through scattering and
absorbing radiation (see
Aerosol — radiation interaction) and indirectly
by acting as cloud condensation nuclei or ice nuclei, modifying the optical properties and lifetime of clouds (see
Aerosol — cloud interaction).
Our climate model, driven mainly
by increasing human - made greenhouse gases and
aerosols, among other forcings, calculates that Earth is now
absorbing 0.85 T 0.15 watts per square meter more energy from the Sun than it is emitting to space.
This has been documented for the northern Indian Ocean
by Ramanathan et al. (2001a, b) who estimate a decrease of
absorbed surface solar radiation exceeding 10Wm - 2 over much of the Indian Ocean due to the presence of
aerosols.
I do need to check whether all of the 78 W / m ^ 2 is said to be
absorbed in the absorption wavelengths of GHGs or whether some of this is component is
absorbed in the absorption wavelenghts of other gases and / or
by atmospheric
aerosols.
Aerosols can cool the climate
by reflecting solar energy back out to space before it has a chance to be
absorbed and re-emitted as infrared radition
by the Earth's surface, and also warm the climate
by absorbing extra energy in the lower atmosphere (coming mostly from incompletely burnt carbon from coal - fired power stations and dung braziers).
The
aerosol plume produced
by biomass burning at the end of the dry season contains black carbon that
absorbs radiation.
``... Our climate model, driven mainly
by increasing human - made greenhouse gases and
aerosols, among other forcings, calculates that Earth is now
absorbing 0.85 ± 0.15 watts per square meter more energy from the Sun than it is emitting to space....»
«The ozone layer, the water vapor, the clouds, dust and
aerosols attenuates it in the following way: 1368 W / m ^ 2 / 1.35 reflected
by the atmosphere and Earth's surface = 1013.3 W / m ^ 2 1013.3 W / m ^ 2 / 1.20
absorbed by the atmosphere = 844.4 W / m ^ 2 From this power, the surface only
absorbs a power of 692.41 W,»
Theoretically, coatings of essentially non-
absorbing components such as organic carbon or sulphate on strongly
absorbing core components such as black carbon can increase the absorption of the composite
aerosol (e.g., Fuller et al., 1999; Jacobson, 2001a; Stier et al., 2006a), with results backed up
by laboratory studies (e.g., Schnaiter et al., 2003).