Not exact matches
But we may, I
think, conclude with Errol Harris (AT 74) that from the Hegelian perspective, the
philosophical shortcomings of classical logic extend to mathematical logic as well, and that as logic of the understanding, both deal with the «
abstract concept of class or aggregate,» and are both inextricably connected with a metaphysics of externally related particulars that lose themselves in a «spurious infinite,» and with a concomitant mechanical cosmology.
Philosophy is great when dealing with
abstract, human concepts (beacuse it's process is based around the human as the standard) but without some way to test
philosophical treaties, you are just doing
thought experiments which may or may not have any bearing on events in the «real» world.
«narration», for it achieved its aim very often by telling a story).9 Since the Semitic mind was quite unaccustomed to our kind of
philosophical and
abstract thought, midrash haggadah fulfilled a very important function in Jewish education.
In the last ten years of his life, Wach was often mistakenly
thought to be in the camp of the second approach to comparative religion at Chicago, which necessitated his stating repeatedly that while the philosophy of religion applies an
abstract philosophical idea of what religion is to the data of empirical, historical studies, the history of religions begins with the investigation of religious phenomena, from which, it is hoped, a pattern of «meaning» will emerge.
Whitehead and Hartshorne, using similar
philosophical concepts, also rely on a combination of
abstract thinking and particular experiences or intuitions.
The Hebrew mind, as represented in the Scriptures, did its
thinking in a metaphorical fashion; indeed it might be said that the Jews
thought mythologically, if by this word we mean that they
thought in pictures and in stories, rather than in
abstract concepts and Greek
philosophical ideas.
In 1972 he turned to words and their immateriality to explore the relationship between
abstract categories of
thought, such as general and particular, finite and infinite, culture and nature, the passing of historical time and the hypothesis of the eternity of universal physical laws, the routine of experience and the abstraction of
philosophical principles.
It is hard to describe exactly, but I am
thinking really of inculcating a mind - set or habits of
thinking: approaching legal problems as a lawyer
thinking about the practical needs of their client, as opposed to as an
abstract,
philosophical or intellectual problem.
The
abstract,
philosophical, intellectual approach is naturally part of academic legal education, but I do not
think it is a good thing to get only that.