* The Financial Review today runs a piece (paywalled) from Danny Price of Frontier Economics, combining
absurd alarmism about the supposed cost of a carbon price (already refuted by experience) with advocacy of the nonsensical and dirigiste «Direct Action» policy
Not exact matches
I suspect some editors will soon be replaced in scientific periodicals that engaged in censorship,
alarmism, and the publication of AGW pieces that were simply
absurd.
California is proceeding down this
absurd emissions reduction path while the «science» supposedly supporting climate
alarmism claims is crumbling with global climate models shown to be flawed and failed by climate scientist testimony before Congress and UN IPCC acknowledgements of the undeniable truth that it is impossible to create credible global climate models which, in fact, has been the case for the last 25 years.
In the post
Alarmism Cranked Up to
Absurd Level, we discussed the misleading media reports about the temporary February 2016 El Niño - related uptick in monthly global surface temperature data from the Goddard Institute of Space Studies.
This Catallaxy thread has it all, if you can stomach it — bogus statistical claims from fools too ignorant to estimate a trend line and too lazy to learn how, silly IPCC and BOM conspiracy theories,
absurd economic
alarmism about the allegedly catastrophic effects of the carbon price, CO2 as plant food, and so on.
So what is Carrington up to with all this revision of some of the most
absurd global - warming
alarmism that has materialised over the past few years?
IPCC should spend all their time on a realistic ensemble forecast, this prevents the
alarmism connected to
absurd extreme scenarios.