Article 82 prohibits
abuse of a dominant position by an undertaking (s) that may affect trade between member states.
In that respect, the difference, in this case, focuses primarily on the question whether the Commission had to identify an actual or potential
abuse of the dominant position by the applicant, or whether it was sufficient for it to establish that the State measures in question distorted competition by creating an inequality of opportunities between economic operators, in favour of the applicant.
Not exact matches
The culture
of consumerism and the chase for material symbols
of wealth and security have sometimes come to be
dominant; the pursuit
of spiritual fulfillment in many has slowly begun to degenerate into empty and sterile ritualism; the legitimate thirst for education has often become perverted into an obsessive drive to acquire with the greatest speed the formal diplomas necessary to gain entry to jobs offering the easiest opportunities to make the quickest rupees; political statesmanship in some areas has begun to depreciate into an opportunities race for power and
position; the spirit
of SEVA (Service) to the nation has intermittently begun to be suffocated in many,
by the
abuse of discretions, sometimes mediated
by a bloated bureaucracy itself enmeshed in a vast network
of multiplying paper and self - proliferating regulations; menacingly many good and decent people even in public life, have come to be corroded
by a culture
of demanding corruption; and some potentially creative lawyers, have begun to take perverted pride in mere «cleverness», rendering themselves vulnerable to the prejudice that they are a parasitic obstruction in the pursuit
of substantive justice.
Its decision not to investigate claims Fonterra was
abusing its
dominant position to keep prices artificially high, followed a similar «no worries» verdict delivered recently
by the Australian Consumer and Competition over pricing practices
of mega-retailer Coles.
The directive's aim is to make it easier for consumers and businesses to claim for loss caused
by cartel and concerted practices or
abuse of dominant market place
positions.
«It's an
abuse of dominance allegation... being that TREB has a
dominant position in [Multiple Listing Service] based real estate, and that it
abused that
dominant position by restrictions that it put on access to MLS data,» says Donald Houston, partner at McCarthy Tétrault LLP in Toronto.
Such an infringement may thus be established where the State measures at issue affect the structure
of the market
by creating unequal conditions
of competition between companies,
by allowing the public undertaking -LSB-...] to maintain (for example
by hindering new entrants to the market), strengthen or extend its
dominant position over another market, thereby restricting competition, without it being necessary to prove the existence
of actual
abuse.
Any
abuse by one or more undertakings
of a
dominant position within the internal market or in a substantial part
of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the internal market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.
In Case C - 170 / 13 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp & ZTE Deutschland GmbH, (Judgment
of the 5th Chamber, CJEU, 16 July 2015) the CJEU was asked to rule for the first time on whether seeking an injunction and other associated remedies
by the owner
of a Standard Essential Patent (SEP) against a company in breach
of the patent (but one willing to become a licensee) can amount to an
abuse of a
dominant position in breach
of EU competition law (Article 102 TFEU).
That was the main argument made
by France Télécom and Orange Caraïbe when they appealed against a decision
of the French competition authority which had fined them for
abusing their
dominant positions.
On 29 September 2004 the Danish competition authority decided that Post Danmark had
abused its
dominant position by (amongst others) targeting the three customers
of FK with very low prices (so - called predatory pricing).
The question therefore arises as to the extent to which an
abuse, even if only potential,
of the
dominant position by an undertaking must be identified, that
abuse having a link with the State measure.
The rule changes ushered in
by the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which came into force in October 2015, should result in an increase in claims arising out
of infringement
of competition law (for example damages claims relating to cartels, anti-competitive agreements, or
abuse of a
dominant market
position).
EU legal professional privilege has developed in a particular field
of EU law, namely EU competition law, in the context
of investigations carried out
by the competent EU competition law authority, the European Commission (the Commission) into violations
of the provisions
of the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union prohibiting anticompetitive agreements and
abuse of a
dominant position (although, in principle, the privilege could protect communications relating to other proceedings brought
by the Commission in which the rights
of defence arise).
Advising the British Horseracing Authority in its successful appeal against a decision
by the High Court that it
abused its
dominant position in the supply
of UK pre-race data to bookmakers.
Alex regularly advises clients on the risks
of anti-competitive agreements and cartel activities and counsels
dominant and non-
dominant clients on the risks and opportunities presented
by the rules that prohibit
abuse of a
dominant position.
Successfully defending Cardiff Bus against a multi-million damages action brought
by the liquidator
of a competitor following an OFT finding that Cardiff Bus had
abused a
dominant position in the Cardiff bus market.
In particular Alcon has been ordered to produce various documents to the Commissioner regarding allegations they have
abused their
dominant position by «Product Switching» that disrupted the «supply
of Patanol for the purpose
of deterring the entry
of generic [in particular Apotex] versions
of Patanol» (Federal Court File No.
The European Commission has informed Google
of its preliminary view that the company has, in breach
of EU antitrust rules,
abused its
dominant position by imposing restrictions on Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators.
Google and Apple are
abusing their
dominant mobile market
position by pushing their own products and services at the expense
of those developed
by independent companies, several European startups including Spotify, Rocket Internet, and Deezer wrote in a letter sent to the European Commission on Thursday.
The Competition Tribunal applied Section 79
of the Competition Act and via a highly detailed and rational 170 page analysis determined that TREB violated the Act
by abusing its
dominant position by imposing restrictions on members which desired to operate «Virtual Office Websites» (VOWs) as a means to distribute information which was acceptable to be distributed (and being distributed)
by members who do not operate VOWs.
That «agreement» in and
of itself is a form
of «
abuse of dominant position» in an economic sense, formulated and initiated at the outset
by CREA to let underlings in, but not let them out.
It appears that now that times have changed, that CREA feels that the «
dominant position» scenario and alleged
abuse thereof will be judged in a different light,
by a court
of law if need be, due to the recent relative birth
of alternative models now at play, in addition to those continuing to come onto the scene across Canada.