KE «it absolutely makes sense for a survivor say angry, even abusive, things back — OR for a survivor to freak out and ask others to stop saying words that seem potentially abusive to them because they want to stop
all abusive cycles (which is hardly described as «discomfort»)... can you understand that, perhaps, both sets of actions make sense, both are uncomfortable, and there are times when both may be constructive (or destructive)?
«OR for a survivor to freak out and ask others to stop saying words that seem potentially abusive to them because they want to stop
all abusive cycles (which is hardly described as «discomfort»).»
UNTIL you feel you can enter
the abusive cycle with detachment, it's often better to stay away unless absolutely necessary — I find the analogy of an alcoholic going to a bar to be helpful for me.
Until the abuser decides to stop
the abusive cycle, find healthier places to play.
No matter how you cut it this is
an abusive cycle and it continues as long as the abused spouse puts up with it.
I practice Attachment Parenting because I want to end
the abusive cycle that has permeated in my family every single generation.
In other words, don't count on Lipton to break
the abusive cycle in which Cuomo kicks down at the unions, who kick down at the WFP, who then kick down at grassroots activists backing the Green Party campaign of Howie Hawkins and Jia Lee, the latter a New York City teacher and opt - out activist.
After choosing to go on my own personal healing journey, I finally discovered the key to freeing myself from
this abusive cycle.
But yet, the only way to defeat living in
this abusive cycle is to get ahead to the best of your ability.
The theory behind this approach is that working with parents alone or children alone will not stop
an abusive cycle.