In 2010, we were involved in establishing Federal Trade Commission rules that ban
abusive debt settlement practices.
Not exact matches
The GAO report found that «some
debt settlement companies engage in fraudulent, deceptive, and
abusive practices that pose a risk to consumers.»
The Ontario government announced last week that it will be instituting measures to curb the
abusive practices of «
debt settlement» companies.
«GAO found the experiences of its fictitious consumers to be consistent with widespread complaints and charges made by federal and state investigators on behalf of real consumers against
debt settlement companies engaged in fraudulent,
abusive, or deceptive
practices,» the report concluded.
However, there have been allegations that some
debt settlement companies engage in fraudulent,
abusive, or deceptive
practices that leave consumers in worse financial condition.
GAO's investigation found that some
debt settlement companies engage in fraudulent, deceptive, and
abusive practices that pose a risk to consumers.
Rather, recent complaints and enforcement actions demonstrate that particularly
abusive practices have been found in the
debt settlement industry.
Based on my experience in covering stories about
debt settlement abusive practices it seems like the advance fee ban initiated by the FTC goes a long way to protect consumers but is not so hard and fast that there are not some small allowances given to
debt relief providers.
The FTC has adopted final rules to protect consumers from deceptive advertising and
abusive business
practices by the
debt settlement industry;