Sentences with phrase «academic accountability criteria»

CCSA's minimum academic accountability criteria do not apply if a school is: Alternative Schools Accountability Model (ASAM), Alternative, less than four years old, or has less than 30 valid test takers.

This framework sets minimum academic accountability criteria that guide CCSA's advocacy for renewing and replicating charter schools.

CCSA has developed several support resources to help all California charter schools in the cycle of continuous improvement, particularly those schools that are at risk of being below CCSA's Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria.

CCSA's Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria would not apply if a school is designated as DASS (Alternative), less than four years old, or has less than 30 valid test takers.

Since 2009, CCSA's Member Council has led CCSA's accountability advocacy efforts for renewing and replicating charter schools, including the development of CCSA's Accountability Framework that sets Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria to measure academic performance of charter schools.

To inform schools, authorizers and the public on school performance, CCSA publishes Academic Accountability Report Cards every fall that show the results of each charter school on the Accountability Framework and CCSA's Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria.

Cards are available for all charter schools regardless of how they perform based on CCSA's Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria.

Note that CCSA's Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria do not apply if a school is: Alternative Schools Accountability Model (ASAM), Alternative, less than four years old, or has less than 30 valid test takers.

CCSA's Minimum Academic Accountability Criteria would not apply if a school is ASAM / Alternative, less than four years old, or has less than 30 valid test takers.

Not exact matches

With the difficulties disabled students face and the highly varied goals and criteria for success that may be appropriate for each student, state accountability testing is not always helpful in assessing the academic progress of individual special education students.

Demanding accountability for results and measuring achievement with the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS), a criterion - referenced assessment — actually, a rather blunt instrument — has spurred significant improvement in student achievement.

In alignment with its accountability framework, CCSA has sponsored a bill in the California Legislature to increase the minimum academic criteria necessary for a charter to be renewed.

This information can fill the need cited by many of the most vociferous critics of accountability schemes in education, who have railed against reliance on students» academic test performance as the sole criterion for judging school quality.

Schools have had the opportunity to review their results on CCSA's Minimum Criteria for Renewal via the Academic Accountability Report Cards since mid-October.

To inform schools, authorizers and the public on school performance, every fall, CCSA publishes Academic Accountability Report Cards that show the results of every charter school on the Accountability Framework and CCSA's Minimum Criteria for Renewal.