First, a brief perusal of the internet reveals an ongoing
academic debate on this subject.
Not exact matches
But he's not there, and neither are most other Western observers weighing in
on the
subject, giving their
debate a whiff of the abstract and the
academic.
He endorses the conclusions of No Place to Learn and enlarges the
debate by discussing a
subject that Pocklington and Tupper don't emphasize, the poisoning of university life by rights - seeking groups who insist (Whitaker writes) that
academic life is naturally «sexist and racist and can only by kept in check through intensive regulation and control... Everything that goes
on must be monitored and policed.»
The board decided in an 11 - 4 vote
on Feb. 14 to revise Ohio's
academic content standards to delete that wording, which was the
subject of heated
debate when it was added to the influential document in 2002.
When you're considering writing up that specialist interest, you might remember these figures, do some research
on Amazon, and recall that
academic books are often subsidized anyway - a
subject of anguished
debate in
academic sites and blogs.