While it may be true that
academic discussions do not lead most people to the Kingdom of God, they do lead some people.
Not exact matches
It is a one - of - a-kind event, a mixture of unalloyed commerce, high - minded
do - gooderism, and brass - tacks policy
discussions, attended by corporate bigwigs, journalists,
academics, non-governmental organizations, and top government officials.
It is not an
academic discussion when the violence is
done
Having an
academic discussion about religious views and theological beliefs is fine enough, but there is certainly no reason to go into a
discussion of who is right an wrong because frankly, you
do not know.
If the Church
does not allow legitimate questions and
academic discussion, it will stagnate — and eventually — die.
There is almost no
discussion of Parliamentary debates or of significant select committee reports, and very little of
academic / policy work that doesn't get mainstream media coverage.
Well, if you're talking about what he said about women in science, I think he should have kept that for a purely
academic discussion — if he wanted to have an
academic discussion about it — and not have
done it in circumstances in which it could become public.
And to ensure that his postdocs and staff don't feel they are
doing work in the lab that can be funneled into one of his ventures, he encourages open
discussion about patents and he generally doesn't transfer any IP discovered in his
academic lab into an old company.
Postdoc associations and offices have begun exposing postdocs to the possibilities available to them by holding seminar series or panel
discussions featuring scientists who have
done something besides become assistant professors at
academic institutions.
Members of the OAIE can share resources and engage in online
discussions, and, in
doing so, will enhance stakeholder interactions and build well - informed communities working to respond and adapt to ocean acidification.The OAIE invites anyone working on ocean acidification to join, including but not limited to government, tribal, and
academic research scientists, citizen scientists, experiential and formal educators, NGO employees, marine resources managers, policy makers, concerned citizens, aquaculturists, people in the fishing industry, technology developers, and data managers.
As I see it,
discussion of Success should revolve around one big question: Why
do Success's
academic results seem so outsized, even compared to some of the nation's other, most - accomplished charter schools?
Character education comes from teacher exemplars; character education comes from
discussions / reflections within
academic areas; character education comes from activities — the wisdom from
doing those activities.
So much of the
discussion on English language learners in U.S. schools focuses on what they don't have (for example,
academic English) or what they haven't been able to
do (such as graduate in rates comparable to proficient English speakers).
I recently joined Julian Vasquez Heilig and T. Jameson Brewer, two
academics who have made quite the cottage industry out of bashing TFA, for the second episode of their podcast, Truth for America — not because it has a big audience (it doesn't) but because I think it's generally a good idea to engage with people who disagree with your views, if you can keep the
discussion civil and productive.
Although the states that adopted Common Core's standards
did so legally (usually by a vote of their state boards of education), many state policymakers deliberately minimized public awareness and
discussion of the standards»
academic deficits in order to ensure their passage and continue their use.
The schools would
do much better if they concentrated on turning classrooms into
academic places where ideas really count, places in which
discussion of those ideas is at the center of classroom activity.
Superintendents from at least Maple Heights and Warrensville Heights joined
discussions, as
did the chief
academic officer of the Cleveland school district.
That said, my understanding of settlements is that you'll normally have to cough up the money straight away so the whole
discussion is a little
academic if you don't have the money.
And in some senses I would suggest it would almost be better if employers had a credit score, because that is aimed at synthesizing the information in an
academic way; but I
do think that these studies about credit scores and the disparate impact on minorities, in particular, should inform this
discussion.
Animal Ethics was formed to carry out outreach to provide information about the reasons to respect all animals, to promote
discussion and debate about issues in animal ethics and among
academics and scientists and to
do research and provide resources for animal advocates.
The
discussion proving why he
did or didn't relate to Jackson Pollock was largely a matter of
academic jockeying for position and power.
Why
does a rational
discussion basedon a clear point of
discussion - the failure of
academics to even perceive the issue well enough to make a competent survey - attract wack jobs from both sides of this?
bi —
do you really think people should start every blog
discussion by giving references for all previous
academic publications?
When I look at the feasibility studies
done by renewable energy advocates in the
academic community; and when I see their graphs and their assumptions and their various technical - economic feasibility
discussions, I often come away with a feeling that these people really don't have a clue as to how they can make all these grand plans work out in practice.
Not only
did you attack my comment on the basis of my fairly offhand reference to hydrocarbon formation, (my intial comment primarily related to the dead zone off the Oregon coast and its possible causes and effects) you used my comment to claim that this website, which is one of the few places where unbiased scientific
discussion of global warming appears outside of strictly
academic circles, has «way too much junk science».
Although articling doesn't exist in the U.S., there is considerable
discussion between
academics there about practical legal education.
It's more used as a famous «You can't say that in America» and I was trying my hardest not to use examples that would violate Stack Exchange language rules... and I really, really,
do not like using slurs even in
academic discussions.
If so, that
does say much about the quality of
academic discussions or the
academics making such comments.
This is not a knock on the fine
academic work
done by legal scholars or criminologists, but the policy academy and practitioners have a lot to say about sentencing that really hasn't been reflected in usual
discussions, as much the fault of the latter as the former.
Tom Calma also suggests that health professionals and
academics could
do much more to challenge the «mindless
discussions» that so often are fanned by shock jocks and sensational media headlines, and he stresses the need for a consistent, long - term policy focus.