Interestingly, the quantitative difference between an endogenous and neoclassical model framework - with improved skills affecting the long - run growth rate versus just the steady - state income level - matters less than
academic discussions suggest.
Not exact matches
There have been many
discussions in the
academic world that
suggest STEM education is best approached through interdisciplinary methods.
And in some senses I would
suggest it would almost be better if employers had a credit score, because that is aimed at synthesizing the information in an
academic way; but I do think that these studies about credit scores and the disparate impact on minorities, in particular, should inform this
discussion.
I
suggest also that
academics seek those with differing views and participate in rational
discussions, putting biases at the door.
Tom Calma also
suggests that health professionals and
academics could do much more to challenge the «mindless
discussions» that so often are fanned by shock jocks and sensational media headlines, and he stresses the need for a consistent, long - term policy focus.