This access may be easily taken for granted by
academic library patrons, and therefore simply not a focus for publishers.
Not exact matches
As
library ebook lending for both
academic and public institutions continues to make steady progress,
libraries are finally able to «shop» the competition to provide the best user experience for their
patrons, the largest catalogs of bestselling titles, and investigate the available features of different platforms.
They were inspired by a talk given by
academic and author David Vinjamuri at the 2013 ALA Annual Conference in Chicago, where he noted that
libraries were paying $ 84 for books that
patrons could buy for $ 14.
Academic libraries can prioritize critical information to search, order and deliver more content to more
patrons.
And the fact that
libraries often can't get eBook packages / options that provide the content our
patrons want (especially in
academic libraries).
This is exciting news not only for
patrons who may wish to enjoy Japanese - language titles, but also for OverDrive's
academic and K12
library partners.
«Our long term aim is to help public and
academic libraries provide ebooks to their
patrons and to make available the widest possible collection of ebooks from all over the world.
«We are pleased to add tens of thousands of new e-book titles to our MyiLibrary platform for more public and
academic libraries, and their
patrons to enjoy.»
That university probably has more resources for
academic journals, but may or may not allow public
library patrons to use those resources.
This
library partnership meets the need for digital content from
libraries whose users and
patrons are still clamoring for relevant
academic digital content.
Patron - driven acquisition (PDA) is one of the most talked - about models for acquiring ebooks in
academic libraries.
This session will bring together a privacy law professor who is thinking about a world without intellectual privacy, an
academic librarian who worked with an ALA committee to create
Library Privacy Guidelines for E-book Lending and Digital Content Vendors, and a public librarian working on a grant - funded project to help
library professionals increase their knowledge of digital and data privacy concerns to better serve the
patrons who access their
library's technological resources
The
library's new e-book collection will probably attract new
academic patrons given the concentration of computer - savvy users at four universities and colleges located in the most rural area of western Virginia.
Rather, its focus is on the digitization and open access to historical and archival documents, making it a great tool for researchers and
academic institutions, but of little day - to - day importance in the lives of typical public
library patrons.
Polaris Library Systems, a trusted provider of technology solutions for
academic, private and public
libraries, will employ OverDrive's Discovery APIs and Circulation APIs (application programming interfaces) to create a more desirable, seamless
patron experience for
libraries with an OverDrive e-content subscription.
Established in 2003, Polaris
Library Systems provides
academic, private and public
libraries with an integrated
library system that boosts productivity, improves
patron satisfaction and transforms how
libraries connect, communicate and collaborate with their communities in the modern world.
As we turn our efforts to respond to
patron demand and begin buying more e-books, and with only a small number of e-book vendors (mostly
academic) allowing for any sort of ILL, the more our book collections go digital, the less we will be able to loan to other
libraries or borrow from other
libraries.
And if they are catering to
academic communities keeping up with those rapidly changing disciplines, providing access to
patrons at the point of need by leasing rather than owning content makes sense for those
libraries.
EBL offered the best selection of titles for
academic libraries, although some
patrons complained that they had trouble finding downloaded ebooks on their devices.
First, there are compelling arguments not only for admitting but also for excluding the public; second,
academic libraries admit or exclude the public based on their individual circumstances, such as budget, staffing level, and location, that is, whether the sheer number of people in the community using the
academic library threatens to overwhelm the primary
patrons the
library has been created to serve.
The case law seems to suggest that, rather than deciding public access policies based solely on considerations of the public or private nature of their universities, the amount of public funding received, or their
library's depository status, librarians can consider the individual characteristics of their own universities — the university's mission, their
patrons» needs, their financial circumstances, and the place they see for their
academic library in the larger community.
Academic and law
libraries struggle to be able to pay for the journals they need, often taxing their
patrons to augment their funding.