In the meantime, Simon James, who blogs at Australian Climate Madness, has submitted a Freedom of Information request to the University of Western Australia in an effort to force the release of emails related to the study, and prominent climate - change skeptic Steve McIntyre has urged readers to email the university with
academic misconduct complaints.
I have other stuff to do right now, but I'm sure Northwestern and Wharton will be pleased to receive
academic misconduct complaints for this high - profile paper.
So I filed
an academic misconduct complaint and, lo and behold, the verification r2 results were reported in the revised Ammann and Wahl.
Not exact matches
Their decision to reveal these key data is necessarily obscure, but may well have been prompted by McIntyre's decision to file a
complaint of
academic misconduct about Amman with his employers, UCAR.
The accepted version, after a
complaint of
academic misconduct against Ammann, admitted that the verification r2 of the Mann reconstruction was ~ 0, a point cited by the NAS Panel.
This past week the Alberta Queen's Bench released Pridgen v. University of Calgary, 2010 ABQB 644, a decision which quashed the
academic discipline of students who had criticized a university professor.The applicants were participants in a Facebook group that used potential defamatory statements, which prompted in a
complaint by the professor that resulted in non-
academic discipline for
misconduct.