Ten years on that statement holds good in my view, but the jurisprudential basis for the more flexible approach, and its practical consequences in different legal and factual contexts, remain uncertain and open to debate (see de Smith op cit paras 11 - 086ff and the many authorities and
academic texts there cited).
Not exact matches
Even less helpful are
academic ploys such as the one that all religious
texts simply legitimate certain prior social or political commitments and
there is no God in the loop at all.
Now it has become an
academic amusement in which the dogma that
there is nothing outside the
text repeats Haeckel's dogma that ancient and modern cosmogonies are only poetic fantasy, and at the same time clears the field for an exuberant and highly controlled preoccupation with intersubjectivity and intertextuality.
Although
there are several plagiarism detection tools already available, they are not well - suited to filtering
academic content simply because they haven't had access to the relevant full -
text literature to screen against.
Imagine that
there are two types of news: one that is emotional («your house just burned down») and another
academic one («memorise this
text after a nap»).
There may be other
academic vocabulary words the tool does not highlight that a teacher determines are important to the
text.
Yes,
there is
text that is kind of wordy and
academic, but in terms of usefulness of the contents, those tables of strategies can't be beat.
Is
there a place on Goodreads for authors of technical or
academic texts?
While I will reluctantly read paperback - sized books when
there is no alternative, I much prefer the larger
text and page size typical of a large hard - cover book or
academic textbook.
While
there are of course legitimate
academic reasons to study the
text and regular folks may just be plain curious about the book, reading Mein Kampf isn't exactly the sort of thing people will want to do on the commute to work - which could be exactly why it's proving so popular in ebook format.
A contrast in approaches between
academic finance and FF is contained in the introduction to Brealey and Myers Principles of Corporate Finance (McGraw Hill 1991) a leading finance
text, where the authors state «
there are no ironclad prerequisites for reading this book except Algebra and the English language.
She also includes both accessible and
academic works —
there is a lot of diversity and a lot to love, even if the quality of the
texts varies dramatically.
I remember reading a
text of Edward Saïd (founder of the postcolonial
academic field), he said that
there is not a concept such as a point of origin, when one starts a research, one should subtract something from the mass and start to think about this certain subtract.
There is also an interesting book that purports to teach higher - level reading skills to law students, and which strikes me as a very useful
text: R.A. McKinney Reading Like a Lawyer: Time Saving Strategies for Reading Law Like an Expert, (Durham, N.C.: Carolina
Academic Press, 2005).
This is not a novel legal debate: the Australians have already been down this road and
there are copious
academic texts and commentaries on the argument.