Not exact matches
If we assume for a moment we are indeed in the midst of a historical
warming pattern or cycle, and if we also assume that humanity is not the initiator of
climatic change, then it follows how important it is to understand that humanity is fully capable of exacerbating the situation, by
accelerating the inevitable cyclical.
e.g. there is 1) a mild global cooling from the Holocene
Climatic Optimum 2) A millenial scale oscillation of ~ 1500 years per Loehle & Singer above (i.e. an approximately linear rise from the Little Ice Age — or better an
accelerating natural
warming since the LIA) 3) A 50 - 60 year multidecadal oscillation.
But wouldn't a warmist have to concede that even without humans on the planet that there must be dramatic pivot points in
climatic timeline trends where
warming would necessarily rapidly
accelerate by default, measurable over multi decadal levels?