Not exact matches
I agree with not going trying to change the world as in change to people by telling them they are wrong and I am right (
IF I have understood your
point of view) but I guess I'm not so convinced when it comes to society, and just
accepting what ever **** is in there or anywhere.
If this
view of the relation
of love and power be
accepted the book
of Job must be read as a half - way
point on the way to clarification
of the meaning
of God's power.
If we're raised in a culture that tells us a particular biblical interpretation or political position aligns with God's
point of view, we
accept it.
And
if we're looking at a mans
point of view we get subservience, submissiveness, & often a demand to
accept polygamy!
Who said I care
if anyone agrees with me.
If you think anything I've said is not true then kindly
point it out instead
of saying its nonsense.I'm not forcing you or anyone to
accept what I'm saying.I'm also expressing my
views on the topic.Do you think everything here you've said has made sense?
And just say exactly that to those people, «This is what I feel works for us, I understand your
point of view but I would appreciate
if you would
accept that my way
of parenting is different than yours».
If to compare concept essay to persuasive essay, while you are writing concept essay you do not have to influence upon the readers and to make them
accept your
point of view, you do not have to prove anything with the help
of evidence.
My
point was that,
if we
accept this basic story (it's too simple, even as an account
of how cultural cognition works; but that's in the nature
of «models» & should give us pause only when the simplification detracts from rather than enhances our ability to predict and manage the dynamics
of the phenomenon in question), then there's no reason to
view the valences
of the cultural meanings attached to crediting climate change risk as fixed or immutable.
From a theoretical
point of view, probably yes,
if one
accepts that the scope
of a trade mark should be limited to what the ECJ refers to as «essential function» — the guarantee
of origin.
From other
point of view,
if we
accept that without reasonable doubt means 100 %, we can not literally prove anything.
It can help to relieve tension
if you
accept different
points of view while explaining your own.
Tip # 2: Connect with agents on LinkedIn: When you don't know someone personally, LinkedIn and Twitter are easier connection
points than Facebook as people
view Facebook as a more personal venue and are wary
of accepting friend requests
if they don't really know you.