That same study found that 2 % of students didn't even
accept a voucher because they did not want to attend a school that provided religious instruction.
Not exact matches
She «knew a lot of the people who left» when the parish began
accepting vouchers, but she stayed
because she believed «we were supposed to be open to everybody.»
Because they were more interested in promoting equality of opportunity than simply consumer choice, sociologist Christopher Jencks and law professors John Coons and Stephen Sugarman proposed placing some constraints on how
vouchers could be used: Disadvantaged students would receive larger
vouchers, and regulations would prevent any school that
accepted vouchers from imposing tuition and fees beyond the value of the
voucher.
In particular, the fact that
voucher programs involve a subsidy to religious schools could complicate the analysis,
because the Court has occasionally
accepted the argument that the failure to provide a subsidy for an activity or institution does not itself constitute impermissible discrimination.
Indeed, 21.6 % of parents who rejected a
voucher that was offered to their child did so
because the school lacked the special needs services that their child needed, and, 12.3 % of the parents who
accepted a
voucher for their child but then left the program cited a lack of special needs services at the school they had chosen.
They argue private schools
accepting vouchers should not necessarily be subject to the law
because embedded in
vouchers is a different kind of accountability, accountability to parents that can choose to take their children, and their tax dollars, elsewhere.
Later in May, Ms. Nelson was notified that Upperroom was barred from
accepting new
voucher students
because of the school's poor exam results.
And I can't
vouch for this estimate's reliability
because I had to
accept what each trust said they received on rebrokerage (this may not be the same as what the DfE says it is).
By January, the Mississippi Department of Education had approved
vouchers for 286 students, yet have only reimbursed 131 of those
because parents could not find schools that would
accept their children.
Texas is a
voucher - free state
because vouchers divert much - needed funding from neighborhood public schools to private and religious schools, they provide no accountability to taxpayers, they allow private schools to pick and choose the students they want to
accept and they don't improve student performance.
Reducing awards would discourage new schools from
accepting vouchers, and it would probably force some schools already participating to drop out of the
voucher program
because they'd be unable to shoulder the greater financial burden.
There, the Court said it was «immaterial» that the «check or warrants first pass through the hands of parents»
because once the child was
accepted by a private school, both
voucher programs at issue gave parents or guardians «no choice; they [had to] endorse the check or warrant to the qualified school.»
Indeed, 21.6 % of the parents who rejected a
voucher that was offered to their child did so
because the school lacked the special needs services that their child needed, and, 12.3 % of the parents who
accepted a
voucher for their child but then left the program cited a lack of special needs services at the school they had chosen.
Practices may provide affordable services to caretakers by
accepting vouchers or coupons for subsidized sterilization and,
because feral cats may be difficult to trap during a particular time frame,
accepting rain checks for subsidized procedures done outside the hours set aside for them.
I personally don't have an issue with
accepting vouchers, and some landlords like it
because it's guaranteed to be paid.