But science does not
accept an answer without evidence for the comfort of having an answer, like creationism does.
Mann's repeated that lie in to one of the groups investigating things after Climategate (and
they accepted his answer without any attempt at verifying it).
Not exact matches
There will always be the weak - minded and / or vulnerable who will
accept easy, ready made
answers from people like you
without questioning.
rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an
answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but
without success» I
accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?
I'm quite content not having all the
answers and in being content, I refuse to
accept without evidence a god.
I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to
answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who
accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who
accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things
without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.
I won't discuss any of the topics you have raised, but I will only encourage you to ask questions, challenge every single doctrine, and (as much as is possible) refuse to
accept any single side of an issue
without investigating other reasonable
answers as well.
We call this process experimental, which basically means that we don't know the
answer with certainty at the beginning (nor can we simply
accept an
answer on authority
without testing it), but only when the experiment is over.
While we can't know the
answer for sure, I somehow doubt they'll just
accept that (not
without a lot of kafuffle anyway).
The
accepted answer correctly states this,
without predicting any potential future actions.
Accepted answer seems to imply (
without evidence to prove that implication) that school funding disparity causes school districts to be better or worse.
He was to my mind the Socrates of the 20th century who raised a lot of questions and dissuaded people from
accepting his
answers as the truth
without verifying that through their own perceptions.
Anyway this
answer was well - written and helpful so I'll go ahead and
accept it rather than leaving the question
without an
accepted answer.
Accept this
answer as it is,
without seeking to interpret it.
@hellyale: Even
without enough rep to upvote you, as the asker, can do something perhaps better: Click the checkbox to
accept the
answer.