Sentences with phrase «accept any books by»

We will charge 40 % of the total (on Paypal) when we accept your booking by email and then the remaining 60 % on the day of your arrival.

Not exact matches

They are accusing Trump of accepting unconstitutional gifts from foreign interests, specifically by throwing events and booking rooms at the Trump Washington hotel.

Her second book was initially rejected by 36 publishers before being accepted for publication.

So, knowing how easy it is to fool people with a false claim of being nonfiction, you expect me to just accept the claim of the Bible when you'd think me a fool for accepting a similar claim by any other book?

And to mention the phsycology of the time is just another poor defense — much like saying slavery was OK»cause that was the accepted practice (and supported by the christian book - of - silliness) at that time.

Also Mormons hav added their own Book of Mormon to the accepted canon of the revealed word and that by itself is enough to disqualify them as Christians.

Furthermore, in the book of Philemon, a Christian had a slave that ran away, and was converted by Paul, and Paul told the Christian to accept the slave back as a brother.

On the face of it the passage is a mystical experience; but the way Alyosha got to it was by way of Father Zossima's putrefying body: he had to go through that experience of radical dissociation, accept it and take it with him, an experience fully described in the earlier part of Book VII, in order to come to the insight that «the silence of earth seemed to melt into the silence of the heavens.»

This is, in effect, a commentary on the material generally ascribed to Q. By today's standards the author accepts material as authentic far too readily, and he conspicuously fails to take notice of form criticism, but this is nonetheless a great book.

Even if we accept the highly questionable proposition that the Big Bang had to have some intelligent designer behind it, how do we get from there to the Bible, a book written by ignorant men on one planet 13,400,000,000 years after the event?

If you know about it once, you know about it always, or you have to accept that your bible is just a book written by men that has been edited and modified throughout the centuries and has no real bearing.

2000 years of tradition and all books of the Bible which are divinely inspired do not mention «a wife» The current canon was adopted at the Council of Trent by the Catholic Church and it is also accepted by Protestant faiths.

He is also right, in the several books he has written on the theme, in reporting that it has never been universally accepted or applied by Christian moralists or statesmen.

You know as well as I do that the current accepted canon is not what has always been accepted and there are dozens of 1 century letters and books that were written and included and then removed by the Church in the 2nd and 3rd centuries.

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

Such a view was accepted by Justin and Irenaeus in the later second century, although in the third century Dionysius, bishop of Alexandria, attempted to minimize the authority of the book by proving that since John son of Zebedee wrote the gospel ascribed to him, he can not have written the book of Revelation, since the two writings employ different ideas, styles and vocabularies.

These young progressives, you say, «read religious books and pray but find churches boring and irrelevant,» and are offended by churches that don't accept gays and «relegate their non-Christian friends to Hell.»

The Muslims still accept a book, which was drafted by a false prophet, called Muhammad, in the beginning of the dark age (around 600 a. D.).

This, I believe, is one of the most misinterpreted books out of all those commonly accepted by most Christians to comprise the totality of scripture.

«it reads in Leviticus 20 vs. 13, that this is an abomination, and forbidden by death, and this sounds pretty condemning to myself, and others who read this book, it is not accepted.»

Matthew, excuse me, regardless of this so called proof, it reads in Leviticus 20 vs. 13, that this is an abomination, and forbidden by death, and this sounds pretty condemning to myself, and others who read this book, it is not accepted.

Well, every creation «scientist» needs to gain scientific credibility by publishing papers in refereed scientific journals and books and the sort of nonsense Dr Snelling publishes in Creation Ex Nihilo is unlikely to be accepted in any credible scientific journal.

Refined through the sifting process commonly called canonization but now realized to have been merely a growing recognition of what was of worth, cherished in crisis after crisis when individual and even national life was at stake, accepted by the nascent church, which presently added its own documents and formed the Christian Bible, then carried by both Jews and Christians in their far dispersion, the Bible became the supreme book of the Western world.

Once a person has accepted Christ, there are ample testimonies — some in this book — to God's answering simple prayers by penitent alcoholics.

Yet this was a most important oversimplification, for it made possible for the Jews to accept their fate as the just punishment of God, and to accept the Torah as the book by which they would live.

Given the tremendous insights offered by the use of Aristotle's Metaphysics (which he called first philosophy) for speculative philosophy itself as well as theology, other writings of his were accepted as equally as insightful, including his book, the Physics.

As I contend in a forthcoming book, Death on a Friday Afternoon, this falls far short of an encounter with the God of Israel who accepts defeat by our definition of the game in order to expose the error of our definition.

It would be invidious to mention the names of popular books which commend prayer and set forth techniques of praying, but are so alien to the whole Christian position — although written sometimes by ministers of Christian bodies — that it is astounding that they are accepted so readily by people who profess and call themselves Christians.

All those high minded, elitist, Atheists with their facts and data trying to undermine all the money sucking, psycho babbling congregations by forcing their singular, un-financed, un-socially accepted, barely advertised, right to not believe in the latest fashionable set of Gods or God or books thare are being passed around these last 2 millennium.

His book «accepts the concept of multiple Reformations wholeheartedly,» and seeks to deepen the concept by paying equal attention «to all the different movements and churches that emerged in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, stressing their interrelatedness.»

There is also a view of historical criticism used by atheists against the Bible being deemed Holy Scripture — after all, the canon excluded historical books that were accepted until the council denounced those books.

These same children are likely to conceive of the Bible «as a book of magical veneration, written by God or one powerful holy person,... and is therefore to be accepted at a literal level as entirely true.»

The second is to demonstrate that Newman himself only came to formulate and accept this theory as late as 1839 - 40, contradicting Newman's own recollection that he had key elements in his mind by the time he published his first major book, The Arians of the 4th century, in 1833.

Mary Wollstonecraft's book was too radical to be accepted by the England of the 18th century.

Specific interpretations of contemporary events as part of the end - times scenario laid out in the Book of Revelation are far from broadly accepted by Christians.

According to two late writers Papias stated in his second book that John and James his brother were killed by the Jews, and this tradition has been accepted by many scholars as correct; but the evidence must be considered as very doubtful, and possibly due to a misunderstanding.

He was moved to fierce expostulations against an Alsatian priest, Jakob Wimpfeling, who had written a Little Book on Purity attacking the worldliness and self - indulgence of clergy, both those in the monasteries and the ordinary massing priests, and had specially attacked the Augustinians for accepting the well - known Sermon to the Eremites as written by St Augustine himself.

Each of the three recognized one or more additional books not accepted by the other, e.g., Irenaeus and Tertullian each recognized an epistle of Peter, the Muratorian fragment none; the Muratorian fragment and Tertullian recognized Jude, but Iranaeus did not.

The Anglican clergy were presented by the Revolutionary movement with a special case of conscience revolving around the prayers for the King in the Prayer Book — some continued with the full service unless or until forcibly restrained, others felt they could only perform occasional offices, and others with varying degrees of enthusiasm or regret accepted the transfer of allegiance and modified the services accordingly.

They claimed that all the wizards in LOTR were evil, and since all the wizards are bad guys, this book can still be accepted by Christians.

Tell him the book he keeps by his bed was written by an invisible deity who will punish him with fire for eternity if he fails to accept its every incredible claim about the universe, and he seems to require no evidence whatsoever.

On the other hand, it is to be found among the Bodmer papyri in a little book of the early third century which originally contained both I and II Peter, and in later times it was accepted by all who accepted the Catholic Epistles as a group.

Estimates of the numbers of women booked for home birth but delivering in hospital were even more difficult to obtain because hospital records do not always specify this information accurately and no national estimate exists.1 4 Data collected in this region in 1983 suggested that 35 % of these women changed to hospital based care either before or during labour, and a more detailed prospective study of all planned home births in 1993 found a total transfer rate of 43 %.8 Women were classified as having booked for a home birth when a community midwife had accepted a woman for home delivery and had this arrangement accepted by her manager and supervisor of midwives at any stage in pregnancy, irrespective of any later change of plan.

1 Many people are aware of Elisabeth Kübler - Ross's ground - breaking 1969 book, On Death and Dying, 2 that brought today's widely accepted «five stages of death» faced by terminally ill patients: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and... [Read more...]

However, rather than simply accepting the opinion of states and critical Western scholars as the point of reference, the edited book Responsibility to Protect: Cultural Perspectives in the Global South by Rama Mani and Tom Weiss addresses the important and so far under - researched question of what scholars and activists from the global south really think about the R2P principle and how the R2P implementation process can account for those southern concerns and insights.

There is already a law in the books allowing only the state's casinos to accept wagers on sporting events, only after they are granted a license by the gaming commission.

Louise accepted BASC's invitation to a flight on The Wash, hosted by Fenland Wildfowlers Association, after being unable to add wildfowling as a chapter in her book.

Delbrück concluded by grudgingly accepting that the book «will have an inspiring influence by acting as a focus of attention for both physicists and biologists.»

In the introduction of the book, which ScienceInsider has reviewed, de Mattei criticizes scientists for failing to accept that the theory of evolution isn't supported by evidence and for ideologically denying any metaphysical truth, starting with the existence of a God that created the Universe.

This so - called «ten percent myth», while accepted as such by neuroscientists, still regularly figures in advertisement, but also in books and short stories as well as films.