Sentences with phrase «accept any religion at»

I would want my future children to learn about all religions and have the ability to chose as they please, even if they chose not to accept any religion at all.

Not exact matches

I personally ping - ponged back and forth between religion and non-religion for a long time before accepting that we humans are truly only guessing at things, and likely inventing things, that are impossible to know for sure.

At the National Conference on Religious Work in Beijing in April 2016, Xi declared that religion must adapt itself to China's existing social order and accept the party's leadership.

A Christian feminist can not accept all of the assumptions that are at the base of the new feminist religion.

If that is NOT what you are suggesting, please explain in what ways — how and where — you would accept the «free practice of religion» anywhere other than in a religious building or at home.

I think that many of them at one point believed in Jesus alone for eternal life, but over time, have come to accept the lies of religion that they need to have the performance and good works in order to keep or prove their eternal life.

There have been plenty of wars fought over a wide range of reasons, not all wars are over religion, when are you athiests going to get off of your high horse and accept the fact that everyone, religious and non religious cause violence at some time.

xx4zu1 - «the point that was made is that religion is the only thing that is given to you, in most cases, at birth that you can chose not to accept.»

«Narrative and practical Christianity can, in its encounter with... other religions, keep hold of its eschatological and universal history of meaning without at the same time having to accept the histories of the other religions in a totality of meaning.»

science is not everything, the problem is when the critical and objective philosophy of science is accepted as absolute in reality.God is beyond logic at this point of our consciousness, The process of gods will manfistation is evolution which accepts all variables in the process, the input could be not what scienctists wants.Thats why faith or religion is part of reality.

If your a black, white, Asian, Arab, African, gay, a man, a woman, or whatever your religion is you need to accept life as it comes at you and deal with it!!!

Like the drinks served at the infantile tea party, religion is a fine when we all accept it is all pretend.

My friend Kofi Annan in accepting the Nobel Peace Prize pointed out that at the center of all of the great religions is each person's responsibility for others.

At what point does a religion or religious beliefs become or is accepted as mythology?

======= @Chuckles «I do like also that you at least accepted the fact that these empires had the same idea as the ones you gave which means check and mate my friend and finally getting you to admit that tyrants trying to abolish the religion of the indigenous are not just atheists.

I do like also that you at least accepted the fact that these empires had the same idea as the ones you gave which means check and mate my friend and finally getting you to admit that tyrants trying to abolish the religion of the indigenous are not just atheists.

At the end of the day, those people who can accept and respect that others think differently than them, and can realize that making generalizations about a race / religion / philosophy truly makes you ignorant, those are the people who are truly intelligent.

Why should any rational adult accept at face value a claim that if made about anything other than religion, would be scoffed at as a lie?

«Protestants do at times succumb to the temptation to accept the common Russian division between «traditional» and «non-traditional» religions if they themselves happen to be on the right side of the divide.»

Notwithstanding all that archeology has done for us, and the careful reconsideration of accepted positions in study of the Pentateuch, it still remains that as historic source material the Pentateuch is at its best only hazy - and we have no other for the religion of Moses, except such light as subsequent events can reflect upon it.

Judaism I guess takes it a step further and wants to make sure it's adherents are very serious about being part of the religion, than say a person who accepts jesus or mohammed to ease their conscious at a certain moment in time.

They were all invented at some point by humans and if you are going to believe in any of them you have to accept some pretty far fetching stuff, like you can't question god and the likes, so step into religion and the door slams shut behind you and you will never see the light of day again.

The information at our disposal now makes so evident the complexity, the diversity, of the religious aspect of human experience in all Asian cultures that we can no longer use easy generalizations or traditionally accepted patterns in talking about other religions.

Please remember that I am not required to accept your interpretation of the bible, or even your religion at all.

There are at least as many reasons for accepting religion, loving the Catholic Church for its enormous contributions to the world, and admiring the millions of fine Christians around us.

The second approach to comparative religion at Chicago was advocated by George Burman Foster (d. 1918), who accepted a widely held three - layered scheme: (1) a narrow history of religions — conceived to be the simple historical study of «raw» religious data, often colored by an evolutionary ideology — toward (2) «comparative religion,» which aims to classify religious data and culminates in (3) a philosophy of religion (or a theology) that provides a meaning for the comparative religion enterprise as a whole.

I'm just suggesting you accept that human nature and error have played at least some part not just in other religions, but in Christian theology and scripture as well.

So, those are things some of us which were otherwise, but once we learn to look at the details of things and accept that information, that is when we go from wishing (praying) and believing (religion or non-religion) and continue the process of learning and growing.

It is solely through timidity that historians of religions have at times accepted an integration proposed by sociologists or by anthropologists.

No, at least not in the sense that religion is a revealed doctrine, surpassing human reason and accepted as a matter of faith.

Only if you accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.

Clearly alarmed by the religious instruction that would occur at religious schools — «not only is the risk of religion intruding into the secular educational function great, that risk is inevitable and unavoidable due to the very structure of the Scholarship Program» — Judge Martinez accepted nearly all of the ACLU's claims.

The trial court accepted the plaintiff's argument that restricting the scholarships to secular subjects at religiously - affiliated schools would not suffice because religion can pervade all subjects at such schools.

Our way of living may consist a look, a way of thinking; a religion that does not conform to whatever is a norm or the accepted at a given time.

We live in a world where Pastafarianism is accepted by the authorities as a religion, yet laughed at by the masses.

The Strasbourg institutions have not been at all ready to find an interference with the right to manifest a religious belief in practice or observance where a person has voluntarily accepted an employment or role which does not accommodate that practice or observance and there are other means open to the person to practise or observe his or her religion without undue hardship or inconvenience.

As regards the finding of indirect discrimination, the EAT accepted that the requirement for all registrars to perform civil partnership ceremonies placed persons of the claimant's religion at a particular disadvantage in comparison with other persons who do not share the same religion.