Sentences with phrase «accept any value if»

Not exact matches

Anne said: «If we are going to be better at producing food of the right value then we have to accept that genetic technology, whether you call it modification or anything, is going to be part of that.»

If you accept the trends indicating digital is the future, while physical retail is in decline, Canada could find itself shut out entirely — as in, not even the branch plant benefits — from the retail part of the value chain.

But it's difficult to accurately create or accept core values for your company if your own personal core values are unclear.

If your email is original and well crafted, and value proposition is strong enough, they're very likely to accept your request.

If your investments lose significant value as you are preparing to tap them, you may have to work longer than you had planned or accept a drastically lowered standard of living in retirement — or both.

So my point is if the promise that we buy into is that Bitcoin will become a widely accepted currency in and of itself one day, and that it will account for a huge percent of international transactions, thereby realizing its potential value, we need to also accept that the potential has not yet been realized and right now, in the midst of this euphoria, 90 % of buyers are just trying to get rich quick in dollar terms by trading it.

We need not assume that stocks will become reasonably valued anytime soon, but even if one is willing to accept some amount of speculative risk in an overvalued market, there's no need to accept undue risk at clearly overbought and overbullish points.

when cocacola can make his corporate controled cocacola bitcoins diferent that of gold bitcoins which is controled by Satoshi Nakamoto rules when cocacola can give to their employees free bitcoins for good work and their loyality to company when cocacola can make IPO - s in exchange of cocacola bitcoins and owners of cocacola bitcoins can have real vote power in cocacola structure proportional of their amount of cocacola bitcoins when cocacola can guarantee a minimum exchange value of his cocacola bitcoins to real $ or â «¬ or gold bitcoins and so on and ofcourse if cocacola accept cocacola bitcoins in exchange of his real goods, cocacola bottles...

When I try to look for value investments, I am willing to accept less on the value side if I get more on the growth side.

The point of the chart above is to illustrate that those with an agenda to ride the trend and look smart are correct when they state that the US stock market is not particularly over valued... if one shuts off one's brain and accepts policy (blue Monetary Base line, which is but one of several money supply measures) as being at all normal or healthy.

If you can accept that, equities may be much better value than bonds.

Additionally, FinCEN claimed regulation over American entities that manage bitcoins in a payment processor setting or as an exchanger: «In addition, a person is an exchanger and a money transmitter if the person accepts such de-centralized convertible virtual currency from one person and transmits it to another person as part of the acceptance and transfer of currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency.»

In other words, if we accept that there is value in having family representation on the board of directors of a family firm, then The Long View is no more lenient on family firms than BSCI is on widely - held issuers.

If the winner can not accept the car they will have a choice of donating the equivalent value to a recommended charity or charity of winner's choice in the name of the winner.

If LitePay integration comes to reality, most retail merchants will be able to accept it and convert Litecoin to fiat currency instantly depending on the market value at that particular time.

You speak as if you have done so yourself... or have you accepted at face value what Dawkins and many others claim: that there is no evidence of God?

If the requisite disjunctive synthesis can not be explained by appeal to the doctrine that God values all possible worlds, this is not so much because evaluation is logically dependent upon gradations of importance, but because (accepting Christian's explanation of the absence of such gradations in the primordial nature) the logic of the doctrine itself entails that God be inextricably involved in the formation of actual worlds as «circles of convergence,» i.e., in «the orderings effected by individuals in the course of nature.»

If sociologists have tended to center on the foregoing argument and to single out work as the basis of their assessment of our present inability to play authentically, theologians and philosophers have tended to: focus upon a second area: America's distorted value structure that has accepted as true the «mindscape» of technology 48 This is Theodore Roszak's phrase, and his discussion can perhaps serve as a helpful starting point.

If religious belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world - view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist, as normative for their entire lives and as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken as a means but as an end, belong to the religious dimension.

If we accept them, we must look to Jesus for our ultimate standards of judgment and at the same time keep on estimating relative values and probable consequences within the common life.

But Jesus» sacrificial death has given value to all suffering if it is accepted and offered in union with Him out of love for the Father, sincere sorrow for sins - our own and those of the whole world - and charity towards those who have caused it.

If the concepts of relational power and aesthetic value are accepted as more adequate categories for understanding human experience than those arising from substance metaphysics, then we must obviously change our images of ideal personhood and ideal communities.

If modern Christianity has patterned itself after Jesus, then the Jesus we present to the world is not the Jesus who rejected the offers of self - reliance, control over others, and glory before men, but is the «Jesus» who has accepted such values and now holds them up as virtues.

If the traditional formulations of God show him to be the Perfect Good, Absolute Truth and Supreme Being, since goodness, truth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolution.

If one's self - worth, or the value of individuality, is not accepted, solitariness is blocked from becoming communal.

If our human existence is not that of some supposedly substantial and indestructible soul to whom experiences happen, but is rather those experiences themselves held together in unity and given identity by the awareness and self - awareness which makes it possible for us to say «I» and «you», then the enduring reality, which God accepts and values, is precisely that series of events or occasions which go to make us what we are.

One can believe in and accept a meaning or value... if one has discovered it, not if one has invented it.

Why should any rational adult accept at face value a claim that if made about anything other than religion, would be scoffed at as a lie?

If the dispute is about values, some of the evidence will include beliefs about good and evil that are not going to be accepted by those who have fundamental disagreements with your values in the first place.

When we accept this death, or prepare ourselves, if necessary, actively to appropriate it, we fulfill most rigorously the Greek demand to value only that which can not be taken away from us.

It can only have value if and as its members decide to work at it, not in a painfully severe fashion but with genuine willingness to do what they can to promote and augment the relationship, with due recognition of likely failures and with a readiness to accept these when they happen.

I'll mention one fundamental one: if in these contexts I take the liberty to outrightly deny that indeed it was God who said, and not some power group with a dirty political agenda, then WHEN and WHY will I accept «God said...», this and that (and particularly more positive, palatable stuff») at face value?

If you have an open mind to all views, then you can be a Christian and accept the values of an atheist.

If God doesn't go «zap» then we can not simply accept all the miracle stories as true at face value.

The driving force behind this process — i.e., the «factors making for growth in the halakhah» — is, first, the «necessity to respond to new external conditions — social, economic, political, or cultural — that pose a challenge or even a threat to accepted religious and ethical values,» and, second, the «need to give recognition to new ethical insights and attitudes and to embody them in the life of the people, even if there [is] no change in objective conditions.»

For if liberty is deprived of its moral soul, if it is detached from the past and from its venerable tradition, if the continuous creation of new forms that it demands is deprived of the objective value of this creation, if the struggles that it accepts and the wars and the sacrifice and the heroism are deprived of the purity of the end, if the internal discipline to which it spontaneously submits is replaced by external direction and commands — then nothing remains but action for action's sake, innovation for the sake of innovation, and fighting for fighting's sake; war and slaughter and death - dealing and suffering death are things to be sought for and desired for themselves, and obedience too, but the obedience that is customary in war; and the upshot is activism.

The discourses of Jesus, for example, upon Baptism (3) and upon the Eucharist (6) reflect the same fundamental conception of the significance and necessity of these two rites; that this conception was that of the evangelist is plain, e.g. from 3:16 - 21, where Jesus» words have passed insensibly into the evangelist's reflection upon them; if the evangelist was the son of Zebedee, it would be natural to accept his accounts as substantially correct records of incidents and discourses from Jesus» ministry, but, if he was not, a comparison with the synoptic gospels and with the teaching of Paul and others on the sacraments would suggest doubts as to the historical value of both discourses.

«If you can't believe in my own personal authenticity, then evaluate if what I do is what God himself would do if he were in my place; then accept the value and authenticity of my workIf you can't believe in my own personal authenticity, then evaluate if what I do is what God himself would do if he were in my place; then accept the value and authenticity of my workif what I do is what God himself would do if he were in my place; then accept the value and authenticity of my workif he were in my place; then accept the value and authenticity of my works.

Only if you accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.

If you accept that the plan of building the Emirates, allowing high - wage veterans to move on to stay solvent, and developing youth, and bringing in good - value signings has allowed the club to be competitive and at the top of the table while similar clubs, like Newcastle and Liverpool, have not been able to maintain their status as elite teams once the oligarchs arrived.

again I refer back to the quibbling over ten million for a dfender that we ABSOLUTLY NEED!!!! If you value the player and wont accept another you HAVE TO PAY THE ASKING PRICE!!!! I mean jesus we pay Wenger almost as much each year to avoid these scenarios where we need emergency buy in's and no one quibbles about HIM not doing his job!!!!

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

«I can't tell him not to read the papers, but if you're going to accept someone else's value system, you're going to find yourself atop a hill one day and in a valley the next.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

The Daily Mail report that Mourinho's side are willing to accept # 20M for Shaw, and seeing as Everton accepted a # 35M offer for Barkley from Chelsea over the summer as per the Telegraph, it seems as if that's what the Toffees are valuing the player at.

«i turned down the whole world» is what Arsene tells us but let me tell you if he had performed like he have at Arsenal for the last ten years he wouldnt have lasted 5 minutes at any other clubs, Would Barca accept a 8 - 2 drubbing at Real or vice versa??? Would Barca accept 20 years of «trying» to win the cl??? would Barca accept half arsed players giving 50 percent at bramall lane or white hart lane???? would Barca accept more and more outlandish excuses for poor defeats??? Would Barca accepts wengers famous «Values»??? And would Barca accept to pay a very ordinary coach 10 mil a year to achieve the very minimum??? i think you know the answer.

12M is fair for Arshavin, If somebody else hasnt give any offer yet, that means that nobody is interested for now.The Zenit director's comments really showed that they can make the deal at 15M, which means that deal will be done at 13M or 13.5 M max.This is what Arsenal wants and Zenit would accept this.But again Iwould value him at 12M.

The UK is less happy — it has to accept some regulatory alignment which will upset the DUP, but this may be worth it if it gets a final deal on trade that it is happy with (I've shown this by giving a score of 2 for Ireland and 1 for the UK in this case although, of course, the actual values of the scores is arbitrary — it is only their relative value that matters).

If nothing else, that option has value for Trump the individual (he can negotiate something nice for himself, in exchange for accepting, after the election is over, from Hillary - and don't think Trump is not smart and experienced and cynical enough not to realize that).

The Electoral Commission is also able to apply to a magistrates court to order the forfeiture of an amount equal to the value of a donation that has been accepted by a registered party or regulated donee, if the donation was impermissible or a court is satisfied that the true amount of a donation was intentionally concealed.»