Sentences with phrase «accept anything with»

Now, with the Honor 8, the brand comes barrelling back into to the U.S. after a soft launch in 2015 with the Honor 5X, nominally sidestepping the continued reluctance of American carriers to accept anything with the Huawei name.

Not exact matches

«If you can accept the worst that can happen to you and live with it,» he tells Inc. entrepreneurs, «you become superman or superwoman — you can do anything — because your mind doesn't get in your way.»
«I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be distracted with another fight,» Kalanick said in a statement to the Times.
It's worse still if you do so and they accept — and then you never follow up with anything useful for your new connection.
If you want someone to invest in you, confidence is key, and that starts with not accepting anything less than the best in your team, your product or anything you do.
«I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be distracted with another fight,» Mr. Kalanick said in a statement.
Delta said it won't accept those critters as comfort animals any more — or other exotic animals such as hedgehogs, ferrets, reptiles or anything with tusks or hooves.
«I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be distracted with another fight,» Kalanick said in a statement.
«I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be distracted with another fight,» Kalanick said in a statement late Tuesday, according to an Uber spokesperson.
If your top priority is the security of your bitcoins and you accept a temporary inability to transact with them, you don't need to do anything.
However, you don't accept anything that disagrees with your position.
The whole point is you don't accept anything without proof, if tomorrow someone comes up with a better model of universal gravitation then we move to that model.
Like all skeptics, you can deny anything, not just God, but you chose to deny God, while accepting that... anything... your car was repaired adequately and not tampered with... or the food was not older than the package says... or it really is a live broadcast... pick anything that someone tells you, and you had the choice to believe them, or not, based on you choozing that for yourself.
You wouldn't accept in allah we trust or anything else so don't make the rest of us deal with your crap.
Maybe a paragraph about accepting the gift of Sabbath, avoiding anything that starts with the internal monologue of «should» or «ought to» or «must.»
He or she might agree with some of the Bible's teachings if those things line up with his view of life, but he or she doesn't accept anything just because «it's in the Bible.»
I do not see anything immoral with accepting Jesus's sacrifice and have presented responses to display this.
Not a single one of these can be proven or disproven, yet to be anything but agnostic is to accept one of them with zero emperical evidence.
Imagine what a blessing it would be for the Church, were a large and vital group of reformed Catholic traditionalists — freed from harmful ideas and fully accepting Vatican II (rightly interpreted) and the Novus Ordo — were to fully reconcile with the Church, and not do anything to betray the Vatican's good faith, once re-united.
I was not willing to accept that color had anything to do with a hurt child.
He says that if the Bible teaches us anything about God, it is that we learn about God and develop a relationship with Him, not by simply accepting everything the Bible says, but by actually engaging with God in a spirited (both senses of the word are intended there) discussion about the Bible.
Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?
In a time when anything can happen — and usually does — the question is not which point of view is true, but which one we should accept, and then, with God's help, try to make come true.
«I do not accept that your actions here though were anything other than an exercise of free choice repeated again and again when you thought you could get away with it in public lavatories.»
II know that Jefferson accepted the Bible, except for anything miraculous (In fact he commissioned a Bible with all supernatural removed), but I find it hard to avoid some things that can not be explained in my personal life.
God, for Tertullian, is one, but not as exclusively one as Jews believe, being also three; father, but unacknowledged by Jews; merciful, forgiving even Jews; just, punishing especially Jews; wise, even in dealing with sinful Jews; consistent, despite the Jews; humble enough to accept death from Jews; patient, despite impatient Jews; revealed, but Jews fail to understand; lord of history, and proves it against Jews; limitless, except that God can not now ask anything Jewish.
Yes, Jesus a Liberal... and Ken you are a frightened human being... let it go... I'm not pushing anything on anyone... Christ loves everyone... man was made in God's image so deal with it... and me2 you and I both know it was the conservatives who wanted slavery... Abe Lincoln would be sickened by what has happened to his party... he was a man who stood on principle and believed in good for the common man... way different than the party you are tied to... Price... I agree with you in that there are many good Christians... unfortunately, there are many who are very ignorant and use Christ / God as a convenient excuse to denounce what they don't accept...
By accepting and participating in an obvious religious holiday, but then claim to not believe in anything associated with that event accept the commercialism it brings, exposes that person as someone who is confused with thier own feelings.
I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
Without this clear targeting by the Spirit, we find ourselves accepting appointments or calls among people with whom we are not particularly comfortable, for whom we do not particularly care, and to whom we do not have anything special to say.
These words are symbolic of the Yehudi's life and are the most fitting for its close; for of all of the characters in this novel, deeply religious though they are, it is only he who has declared God's oneness, only he who has refused to work for redemption with external means and who has refused to accept a division of the world between God and the devil or a redemption that is anything less than the redemption of all evil and the recognition of God as the only power in the universe.
When I ask you what type of proof you require, your answer is to define what you will NOT accept as proof (anything having to do with human invention, testimony, etc.), but when it comes to what you WILL accept as proof your response is «God should know exactly what would work for me.»
I cant praise God enough for the internet we cant be ignorant these if we want to learn anything all we have to do is to jump on the internet for answers since I have accepted Jesus as my personal savior thirty five years ago i cant stop myself to share my experience with people but since i lost my husband through a tragic accident my life took a different turn my savior became more personal and real to me i give myself full to the lord and the result of that people stat asking me for bible study which i have never done in my life so I decided to search the net and i came across your website which put the whole gospel in a simple way and i am going to use it for my first bible study and see how the holy spirit will lead from there.I came to the conclusion that our trials is a blessing in disguise and i praise God for it.keep up the good work God bless Martina keep me in prayer please
But after observation and analysis, when you find anything that agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.»
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus» health.
Use your mind, and don't ever accept anything anyone tells you that does nt agree with what you know is right.
If science teaches us anything, it teaches us to accept our failures, as well as our successes, with quiet dignity and grace.
Ozil will stay as he can care less of winning anything, as his mentor and protector only here he can get away with his mediocre performances and still have his place safe on the first team... Le Fraud would not last anywhere else before being sacked for incompetent that is why he would not accept the Barcelona job not only for his devotion to this club well aside he gets pay a fortune no questions asked....
Few months back I considered myself a rabid AOB sort of a Piers Morgan type, after some time I came to terms with myself that nothing was going to change, it did not matter my tirades or how many comments would post, things at ARSENAL would not change, our destiny is intertwine with AW till the day he decides is enough for him or his Contract is over, for sure not before that, SO there is no point anymore in pointing AW deficiencies nor trashing the Man, he reached the top of his abilities and is consistent with that, making the top 4 reaching the last 16 at the CL and as a BONUS last year maybe this one the FA Cup, reality is he will not reach anything more and we just have to settle and accept (as he has done) our STATUS QUO a good team but not good enough........
So when Wenger leaves and a new manager is appt do you honestly believe that season we will be title challenges.It will take years and a shed load of money which the new manager won't be getting and in any case Man City with all their monies will dominant football for years.So just accept Arsenal in the short term will not be winning anything other than the occasion cup.Just like now
It's draining we lost to spurs but more over than anything the way we lost was embarrasseing and shocking we were played off park most game that has concern us as fans spurs bullied us out played us hungry in every department it's has fall with wenger when is time when he just accepts game has passed him matter of fact it has passed us arsenal fans aswell no control in middle very poor from xhaka and elneny and again dembele bought mortgage in midfield he's the owner my god vieria would of knocked he's house down but look we're very poor and away from home sad really how wenger keeps he's job is just pure stupidity but not just with today's results over all away from home we're relegation side go get Enrique before Chelsea get him and let but of class and youth take our great club back before Tottenham spuds leave us so far behind we won't even complete this series lack lustrous club
Not even Barca would accept, he's currently on 300 000, anything more than 350k is absurd and should be justified with back to back quadruple winning seasons.
That sounds harsher than it's supposed to, as fans have an aversion to accepting that luck had anything to do with it, but every playoff run needs luck.
The moves the Jets have made at the QB position combined with the incentive laden deal that Teddy ACCEPTED is evidence that the health of his knee remains an issue, whether Zimmer said anything or not.
Who said I care if anyone agrees with me.If you think anything I've said is not true then kindly point it out instead of saying its nonsense.I'm not forcing you or anyone to accept what I'm saying.I'm also expressing my views on the topic.Do you think everything here you've said has made sense?
Wagner was prepared to pay around # 2M for the right - back, however his current club Barnsley are refusing to accept anything below their asking price, with the club now set to consider Swansea's recent bid, report the Sun.
Les Monagesques have previously expressed a reluctance to part with their star assets midseason and, having brought in over # 140m in the summer and with Kylian Mbappe due to join Paris Saint - Germain for # 160m next season, are under no pressure to accept anything other than a huge fee for any of their players.
He hasn't done a lot wrong in recent years, and there isn't anything wrong with him accepting a well - overpaid contract in the Far East either.
QPR will not accept anything less than the # 15m price tag they placed on the England international, who currently tops the Championship's goal - scoring charts with four goals in his last three matches.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z