Sentences with phrase «accept anything without»

I don't think we should ever accept anything without question.

I don't accept anything without thinking it through.

We don't accept ANYTHING without evidence.

The whole point is you don't accept anything without proof, if tomorrow someone comes up with a better model of universal gravitation then we move to that model.

Not exact matches

Most likely it was one or both of your parents, and it happened at an age when you pretty much accepted anything they told you without question, but that's not essential for what I'm about to describe.

Basically that anything besides fact is speculation and can only be taken on accepting things without evidence.

Simpletons acting on faith as opposed to the erudite who rely on logic is as much as saying simpletons don't want to know why anything is the way it is, they just accept what they have been told without a shred of evidence.

Strange, how there's no love without humility — no one can accept anything except on their knees.

Speaking of MORONS, you are saying no one should accept anything in the Bible without checking the original language.

You think you are in control of your life but you are not and until you accept the one that voluntarily shed blood for you, you will go through life without fulfilling your true purpose of anything, except what the enemy of man dictates to your heart.

Without this clear targeting by the Spirit, we find ourselves accepting appointments or calls among people with whom we are not particularly comfortable, for whom we do not particularly care, and to whom we do not have anything special to say.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

The emergentism these philosophers defended accepted ontological physicalism, where the «bits of matter» are nothing but bits of matter without anything mental to them.

Why would you accept as true anything without solid evidence?

If we all just accepted without ever questioning anything, the earth would still be flat and we would all still be living in the bush.

Anything that results in Obama being denied the nomination at this point would literally destroy the Democratic Party — African - Americans could never be reconciled to any Democratic ticket without Obama at the top and many fair - minded Democrats of whatever race, creed or degree of liberalness / conservatism would simply not accept such a corrupt bargain.

We need to accept the good and bad part of our heritage without trying to sugarcoat anything.

The paper was then accepted — without any further problems — but the experience taught me that it is probably impossible to provide 100 % proof of anything.

if you boys desire to get ripped immediately without spending a single another minute in the gym, then you should check out this video tutorial SIXPP.COMIt's a very funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept anything but the best, you very often get it.

If you have any questions about giving up weight loss, making health - supporting changes without stressing about the number on the scale, learning to accept your body as it is or anything else this discussion has brought up for you, please don't hesitate to leave a message below or to send me an email.

It's a mystery, you see — one that routinely mentions doors without ever really doing anything with that; one that returns repeatedly to clues just to pretend they mean something different this time; one that asks you to accept that a conscious human could find a box of evidence in her own art studio and not ask, «Hey, how did this get here?!»

In essence, it's about being professional and taking care, which means don't: agree to meet alone; allow over-familiarity; give out your personal mobile number; meet informally outside working hours and away from your organisation's premises (and certainly don't do so without getting formal approval); allow too frequent contact or over familiarity that may be acceptable with friends, colleagues and family but not from people with whom you only have a commercial relationship; discuss your private life, or social or recreational interests of you or your partner; accept offers, discounts or other services or products by the client, customer or contractor; accept hospitality or gifts that you yourself wouldn't pay for from your own pocket; and don't do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable, obligated or might be open to misinterpretation or might be difficult to explain to your manager, a journalist or an investigator.

Once you've seen a mobile world without pixelated, blurry text, you can't accept anything less.

Many small traditional publishers are open to new writers, accept unagented submissions, create attractive book covers, market the books they publish, and pay real royalties... without charging authors anything.

You can actually do a lot without paper checks nowadays (I only use one per year for car taxes, as they do not accept anything else), but many people shake their heads about even online banking and would never trust it.

Animals are like children in that they are accepting of people without judging them based on anything other than how that person treats them.

The leaders in my not - so - great generation wish to live without having to accept limits to growth of seemingly endless economic globalization, increasing per capita consumption and skyrocketing human population numbers; their desires are evidently insatiable; they choose to believe anything that is politically convenient, economically expedient and socially agreeable; and they act accordingly.

ANYTHING that says «AGW is false» is accepted without thought.

Apparently, too many people in my generation of leading elders are not only too conservative and set in our ways, but also wish to live without having to accept limits to growth of seemingly endless economic globalization, of increasing per capita consumption and skyrocketing human population numbers; our desires are evidently insatiable; we choose to believe anything that is politically convenient, economically expedient and socially agreeable; and we act accordingly.

A prudent man would not accept anything Dr Mann says about anything without independent verification, whether it be his fraudulent claim to be a Nobel Laureate or his multiple fraudulent claims to have been «exonerated» by the University of East Anglia, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the British House of Commons, etc, etc..

From other point of view, if we accept that without reasonable doubt means 100 %, we can not literally prove anything.

My fear is if I accept officially without any salary and bonus documentation, my company could easily not pay me anything extra.