Sentences with phrase «accept arguments like»

And, I'm not going to accept arguments like «Look at Barbara Eden, that's proof of heavenly design, look at CarrotTop, that's proof of Hell!»

Not exact matches

If you do not like my argument and point, then its cool, I do not accept yours either.

And to accept the arguments of the abolitionist, our great - great - grandparents had to see beyond the «plain meaning» of proof texts like Ephesians 6:1 - 5, Colossians 3:18 - 25; 4:1, and I Timothy 6:1 - 2 and instead be compelled by the general sweep of Scripture toward justice and freedom.

Like Vree, I accept the substance of this final intervention of Neuhaus, but I find some obscurity in his argument.

I don't know yet what article the author was criticizing, but the verbiage sounded like disorganized stream - of - consciousness dissatisfactions with arguments the writer did not want to accept.

Because I like Ichiro more than Rose, I'm more likely to accept arguments in his favor.

So for arguments» sake lets accept the premise that without Wenger we would be like Man United.

Sorry,» Me», but this line generally destroys an argument about birth, unless you also want to accept all the other mammalian birth processes, like licking your baby clean, accepting a few deaths in the litter, or dying yourself (and not having anyone blog about it).

Even if one accepts the Cameron argument on the «global race», it suggests we dismantle our society and make it more like China or India.

When we present a new job opportunity to people like this, they don't blindly accept our arguments for making a move; they form their own view based on a careful analysis of the facts.

Haven't read whole thread but hoping no one is making the argument that this is like shifting to color or sound, both of those posed clear impediments to a kind of versimilutude cinema, but for ninety odd years we have accepted the sufficiency of the format without question.

We accept the drugmakers» argument that they have to charge twice as much for prescriptions as in any other country because lawmakers in nations like Germany and France don't pay them enough to recoup their research costs.

It would be different, perhaps, if the book were not written yet, because then the selling your voice argument would carry more weight, but girl, you're just trying to sell something you want too much for someone to accept, and it's too hard to say «Please Like Me» or, in your case, your book.

Esty and Porter make the additional argument that voters would be much more apt to accept their proposal as a source of federal revenue than a rise in the income tax or the like.

What put me off for so long from accepting this, was the risible arguments from sites like «skeptical science» and the innumerate rants of so many commenters on sites like this one.

These groups gladly accept Exxon's support, which enables them to keep churning out misleading reports, to flood newspaper op - ed pages with bizarre arguments against action to curb rampant carbon emissions, and to appear on right - wing TV and radio where they're invited by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck to tick off blatant distortions of climate science without challenge by actual climate experts.

Courts have accepted their arguments that «the Privilege» (as I like to call it) should not apply to tax accountants, patent agents, notaries or paralegals, even if those professionals are providing the same advice that lawyers would.

Since this was done without attorney or client knowledge prior to recent revelations, this does not sound like a winning argument, but consider whether it would be accepted by a court for data gathered after the public revelation of the surveillance.

Even though the defendant based in Taiwan is served with all the legal documents, like the court notice and summons, in compliance with the foreign laws, the Taiwan court will accept the defendant's argument against the default foreign judgment that the legal documents are not served as per Taiwanese laws.

Some automobile insurers like to argue that drinking and driving is intentional conduct, since that argument (if accepted) will allow the company to disclaim coverage for damages resulting from a DUI — whether injuries and vehicle damage sustained by the driver and / or passengers in the vehicle you hit (under your liability coverage), or your own losses (under your personal injury protection or similar coverage).

Autonomous cars need to be proven to be safer before these arguments can be accepted, but Congress seems ready to take companies like Tesla at their word.