Sentences with phrase «accept arguments on»

Not exact matches

Even if we accepted the «kinds» argument where only families were on the ark, not all of the species, it still does not address why there are similarities among families.

rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?

On the other hand, an intelligent deity should accept the «I don't follow any of them since there was no proof» argument.

If sociologists have tended to center on the foregoing argument and to single out work as the basis of their assessment of our present inability to play authentically, theologians and philosophers have tended to: focus upon a second area: America's distorted value structure that has accepted as true the «mindscape» of technology 48 This is Theodore Roszak's phrase, and his discussion can perhaps serve as a helpful starting point.

Similarly, fundamentalist Protestants, believing in the inerrancy of the Bible as though every word of it, dictated by God himself, was to be accepted as indubitably true, ultimately rely in all their arguments on an external authority.

But, on the one hand, French opinion had gradually turned against the Algerian war and no longer accepted the government's arguments.

You may not have changed the difeintion, but you are certainly NOT using the accepted definition I found on over 12 sites, including religious ones, so start with the correct definition, and you will see you causal chain argument is false.

Predictably, she has been savaged by those in the GLBT community who rely on the «born gay» argument, supposedly supported by science, to justify sexual orientation being analogous to race and thus to be accepted and celebrated as a «given» of the human condition.

Collins says that «any position can be argued for, so long as the arguments are based on commonly accepted premises.»

here's the argument to your stupid hedge bet... which is a weak reason to believe by the way... if there is a god, he is the all knowing, all loving, all accepting kind of god and he will recognize those that led good lives and those that led bad ones and regardless of their religious beliefs will judge them on their actions and be allowed into this heaven.

So - what if they accept flaws in their argument (which I usually get them to do), they ignore the flaws (because, as they say, I have the burden of proof), and begin their arguments on the offensive.

This argument — we have to obey the law — would not be accepted on matters such as race, asylum seekers, green issues or others considered important by the politically correct.

For instance, Sanchez seems to uncritically accept the argument that the Pope knew beforehand about the Nazi roundup of Rome's Jews on October 16, 1943, which led to the deportation and transportation of over a thousand to Auschwitz.

Earlier writers had recognized that Volkmar went too far in his attempted demonstration of Mark's dependence upon Paul — he found evidence of such dependence on almost every page of the Gospel — but his view was such a welcome relief from the one - sided Tübingen theory, according to which Mark was a «neutral» in the great apostolic controversy over Jewish Christianity, that the main thesis of Volkmar was accepted without careful scrutiny of his supporting arguments.

I thought, however, that the entire argument presented by Aquinas on the existence of God began with a premise I can not accept.

Even if one attempts by subtle arguments to show that somehow men really accept Christ in their very seeming rejection of him (because the Christian witness they encounter is either unworthy or incomplete and so on), there is still always the possibility of sin, of closing in on oneself against Christ.

Many philosophers have accepted the assumption on which this objection rests — that there might have been nothing or that the existence of a world is cause for amazement — but it is Houston Craighead who has, in effect, aimed this line of argument against Hartshorne in a critique of the ontological argument (PS 1:9 - 24; RTE 33 - 37).

this blog is not working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific method argument; it is consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.

Recognizing that I will not agree with his parity claim, Hasker closes his argument by commenting on my discussion about the need for a theodicy to have psychological appeal, seeking to turn this discussion to his favor by pointing out that traditional theism has been accepted by more people than has process theism.

Fully able to accept secular arguments and allies, on theological and tactical grounds, they will do their cause a disservice if they do not find better articulators of Christian and Jewish theological views — and find some of them, at least, in the pews.

«Nothing personal, but you should learn to take a hint on when to stop and to accept that you don» t always get to say the last word» — Thank you BrisVegas, I hope you have also learnt to be constructive in ur arguments too....

Even if this argument were to be accepted, we must still consider the potential impact of the current and proposed UK systems on the wellbeing and safety of children and their parents — especially given the likely greater vulnerability of the 7 % of families where no father is registered.

Apart from the argument that we have a moral duty to help those who wish to come to this country (which you may or may not accept), there is an economic case in favour of immigration in that the economy benefits from the availability of cheap labour, and there is a case against in that growth in population especially in the crowded South - East creates a lot of pressure on infrastructure such as housing, transport, hospitals, and schools (and the growth in population is largely due to immigration).

It depends on judges accepting the type of argument.

But if you accept his arguments and you wonder how to encourage charitable spending and discourage inheritances than of course you increase the estate tax rate and decrease taxes on charitable donations.

Prosecutors on Thursday afternoon wrapped up 10 weeks of testimony and arguments in Central Islip, where they sought to make the case that the one - time elected officials accepted an illegal stream of benefits from restaurateur Harendra Singh and, in exchange, abused their public positions to get him two county contracts and more than $ 20 million in town - guaranteed loans.

Even if one accepts the Cameron argument on the «global race», it suggests we dismantle our society and make it more like China or India.

The Chamber can not accept the MAC's argument that the presence of ship and hovercraft officers on the shortage occupation list could damage the revival in officer training and risk unnecessary unemployment of suitably qualified UK staff.

I've given the accepted answer on Yakk's as the «custom» argument is persuasive and proven in that it succeeded in Canada.

Accepting the failures of his leadership as his alone against a tide of media hostility and so on, and not of his message and policies — not a wholly implausible argument for those inclined to believe — would give the left's next candidate a much clearer run, a sympathetic hearing and a wave of righteous indignation to ride.

That argument — that the conduct might be ugly but it isn't against the law, and everybody else does it — might sound familiar: it was what former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's lawyers said when U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara indicted him on accepting kickbacks disguised as outside income.

He may also have been affected by the long line of respected senior figures who accepted Labour's argument on the need for Sir Alex Allan, independent adviser on ministerial interests, to conduct an inquiry.

In opening arguments on Monday, assistant U.S. attorney Elizabeth Coombe said Bruno accepted a $ 20,000 - a-month consultancy from Jared Abbruzzese for which he did no actual work.

Einsteinian trait: Rejects accepted physics on the basis of logic arguments.

When we present a new job opportunity to people like this, they don't blindly accept our arguments for making a move; they form their own view based on a careful analysis of the facts.

I also can't accept the argument about not having time, because this meal takes ten minutes to prepare in a slow cooker, and if you can't afford a slow cooker, there are plenty to be found on craigslist.org or freecycle.org, or in thrift stores.

Yet after all your verbal gymnastics, I have yet to see a «dignity» argument from your side calling on sugar babies to accept broke sugar daddies who can't pay much of an allowance.

But their arguments could become relevant on the national stage when they contend the Colorado Supreme Court ruling, by prohibiting private religious K - 12 schools from accepting vouchers, is on a collision course with the federal First and Fourteenth Amendments.

In addition, in your argumentative essay papers on privacy rights you need to analyze both sides of the argument but eventually lead the reader to accept your opinion on the issue.

I've heard the «what if Amazon turns evil» argument a lot of times, but my reading of the situation is that the fear of Amazon some day abusing its power to force a bad deal on authors has to be weighed against the simple fact that publishers are currently forcing authors to accept bad deals.

Before you accept this argument hook, line, and sinker, use a mortgage payment calculator to see if the amount of interest you can deduct on a tax return beats what you can save on interest by aggressively attacking mortgage principal.

If you accept management's argument that new orders lag an economic recovery, then any realistic uptick in new order won't occur until 2012 based on the current economic data.

One reasonable conclusion, if you accept the two arguments above, is you should rely on stock managers who are not wedded to stocks.

Cuomo, consistent in accepting poorly documented arguments from Audubon New York and the New York Sportsmen's Advisory Council, also for the second year in a row vetoed a bill which would have declared a moratorium on mute swan eradication.

- takes place at a prestigious academy located on an isolated island - protagonist is Tenma Wakakoma, who doesn't get along well with his Medabot partner - after a heated argument, he walks back home depressed and ends up meeting the Roborobo Team by accident - he decides to follow them and ends up in a fight involving the group and a mysterious Medabot - Tenma manages to fend off the evil group, but he doesn't know is that an old man witnessed the whole thing - several days later, he receives a mysterious letter that tells him he has been selected to enter the prestigious academy - he even received a scholarship for it - Tenma accepts and enrolls in the academy - the academy is a place where the richest and most influential Medabot battlers train - the academy is located on a large, exhausted Medalia mine - rumors say there's still a large, undiscovered Medalia vain underground - total of 290 Medabots - revamped battle system allowing for swapping of Medabots parts during battle

I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being made against your claims.

Black Flag ran just fine on the PlayStation 4 so I have a hard time accepting «new console jitters» arguments.

I would be * delighted * to see cogent economic arguments in which some economist truly accepts science on AGW and then argues however they want.

There are many unresolved questions as to the effects on climate of soot and ozone control actions, but let's for the moment accept the argument that these effects would be beneficial.

A valuable short paper that has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters (subscription required) makes a strong case against presenting any argument about human - driven global warming that's based on short - term trends (a decade or so).