BC I have already corrected your error with regard to Sodom and Gomorrah and your response, in direct violation to your claim to
accept biblical authority, was that regardless YOU believe what you want to about it anyway.
Not exact matches
I
accept the Bible's
authority; at the same time I have wondered — as with suicide — about a precise identification of every person of this type with the
biblical model» («The Bible and Two Tough Topics,» Eternity, August 1974).
In the complementarian manifesto, the Danvers Statement, egalitarians are accused of «
accepting hermeneutical oddities devised to reinterpret apparently plain meanings of
biblical texts,» resulting in a «threat to Biblical authority as the clarity of Scripture is jeopardized and the accessibility of its meaning to ordinary people is withdrawn into the restricted realm of technical ingenuity
biblical texts,» resulting in a «threat to
Biblical authority as the clarity of Scripture is jeopardized and the accessibility of its meaning to ordinary people is withdrawn into the restricted realm of technical ingenuity
Biblical authority as the clarity of Scripture is jeopardized and the accessibility of its meaning to ordinary people is withdrawn into the restricted realm of technical ingenuity.»
Light Shines and Jeff:
Biblical quotes are only relevant to those who
accept the supposed
authority of the bible.
It is inconceivable to me that Paul can be quoted by modern male chauvinists as the
biblical authority for excluding women from
accepting God's call to serve others in the name of Christ, when Paul himself encouraged and congratulated inspired women who were prominent — to use his own descriptions — as deacons, apostles, ministers and saints.
Perhaps evangelicalism's most common argument concerning
Biblical authority runs as follows: If one will grant the general reliability of the New Testament documents as verified historically, then, as the Holy Spirit uses this witness to create faith in Christ as Lord and Savior, the Christian comes to
accept Jesus Christ as authoritative.
On what basis do they
accept this extreme version of
biblical authority?
We might ask: In a society where everybody, or at least a politically effective majority,
accepts the
authority of the Bible, why shouldn't we be able to appeal explicitly to
biblical teaching in political disputes?
This kind of
biblical absolutism can not be
accepted, for despite the assurance it can generate, such
authority is neither possible nor permissible.
A summary of recent
biblical critical scholarship attempts to provide a similarly credible ground for
accepting its
authority.