Sentences with phrase «accept change very»

They do not accept change very well.

I usually accept change very well.

Not exact matches

Not that I simply accept the situation in the Vineyard or don't think it should change, but I haven't let it push me out of what is a very welcoming congregation.

It's still very much an uphill battle, but even the minuscule time period of the last 100 years has seen dramatic changes in society's acceptance of more «modest» antisocial behaviors (racism, bigotry, bullying etc.) What is now coined «Political Correctness» is really just the fine - tuning of previously - accepted social norms.

This was very important in Gaebelein's case: he might not have been accepted as a leader within fundamentalist evangelicalism, nor become a famous Bible and prophecy conference speaker, if he had not changed his view.

The fact of God indwelling us through His Holy Spirit is going to make a change in our lives and will have much relevance to everyday life so I don't know where you get the idea that «if we accept that the Kingdom is now a «spiritual» Kingdom only, then that leads to the situation where the Kingdom becomes a religious idea that has little relevance to everyday life, very interesting to theologians, pulpiteers and pew audiences, but no dynamic to transform people into action».

And this higher and liberating orientation by grace of man's transcendence as spirit, changing as it does in good Thomistic doctrine the very horizon of spiritual activity (the «formal object»), constitutes by the nature of the case a «revelation», even if it presents no new conceptual object to the mind, and therefore, if accepted, is faith.

ETERNITY is a very long time... You may enjoy your time here now but it will change... I'll pray for your soul and maybe you will see the light and accept JESUS CHRIST as your personal Savior before it's too late.

Some babies can accept any formula being offered to them and will happily switch between different formulas, whilst others may be very sensitive to even the smallest change in their regular formula.

If I was a brand new mom and reading this article I would think my crying baby who has just been fed and changed is just releasing some tension, had I not followed my instinct and looked into it further because I do not accept that infants just cry for the sake of it, I would not have taken her to an osteopath to help her with the very real tension she was feeling in her back from a very traumatic c - section.

«What has changed is that over the past decade, certainly on the economic agenda, we've built a very robust evidence base which civil servants in the Treasury, for example, have accepted.

I very much hope that the Minister will accept that major changes are needed to the scheme, if not scrapping it all together.

The fact that it is a very difficult process requiring 2 / 3rds of both Houses of Congress and 3 / 4ths of all States means that it actually has some legitimacy to the document that which remains is accepted as vital to the nation, and that which was changed was accepted as being rigorously vetted and accepted by the majority of the people via representation.

«In New York City and in cities all over the country, we're very clear, we are not going to accept that negative and divisive path... and no one in Washington can make us change who we are.»

At the very end he makes a bit of a joke about being willing to accept repentant enemies who change their minds and want to jump belatedly on the reform bandwagon.

There is a real possibility of further Shadow Cabinet departures: Clive Lewis has left himself very little room to manoeuvre after he promised to vote against the bill if Labour's changes were not accepted, while all eyes will be on Diane Abbott after her no - show last week.

According to Dr Otabil, it is very important for the young generation not to accept generational tags, restrictions and perceptions imposed on them by their families and circumstances, if they are to become generational leaders, who can engender change, positively, by doing things differently.

«It is absurd to leave someone in charge of a department whose role is to protect the country from a growing climate crisis who himself believes that «people get very emotional about this subject, and I think we should just accept that the climate has been changing for centuries».

If one accepts that climate change is a very serious problem, and I do, one concludes that investing in infrastructure that will last 50 years or more is simply not prudent.

The nutrition community of that time completely accepted Keys» hypothesis, and encouraged the public to cut out butter, red meat, animal fats, eggs, dairy and other «artery clogging» fats from their diets — a radical change at that time that is still very much in force today.

«If you can't change it, accept it» is a very common, yet extremely unpopular saying.

«Without a doubt, the most challenging part has been changing people's mindset — the very thought the women could work and earn a living has been difficult for the men to accept.»

Being introspective enough to recognize what balance is to you, and to accept it as it changes, can be very challenging but very rewarding!

Though it wasn't so much «accepted» by the orthodox, but as is with every concept change of people's mindset quickly happened and now very much exists amongst us.

I am a very open minded person, someone who accepts people as they are, I am a fair individual who adapts to changes in life

I am a very open minded person, someone who accepts people as they are, I am a fair individual who adapts to changes in life and enjoys life to the fullest.

«There were some very practical outcomes such as changes in practice, accompanied by developing tangible «products»... these included a real and accepted definition of global citizenship, new student reports and assessment tools for global citizenship, enhanced use of technology for curriculum mapping, a more global and accessible library collection, just to name a few.

I would be very curious to know if families would accept a change in the way that schools formally communicate students» grades.

Although the Civic was completely redesigned for the 2012 model year, the changes were not very well accepted, leading to a significant refresh for 2013.

We all carry our childhood with us throughout our life... some things are buried deeply... some things we take out to remember frequently... Paula was a survivor, a chameleon... she learned to create new personas that fit the changing circumstances of her life by watching her mother react to life... I thought the author did an excellent job of contrasting Paula and Julian in light of their very different childhood experiences... Paula was a closed up prickly cactus... a dessert survivor... all hard, sharp edges that protected the true inner core of her... Julian was an open succulent... soft, sensitive to his nurturing environment... accepting and giving... like plants and animals, human beings adapt to their environment and when are we most open to learning?

In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the big picture, and only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it

Unfortunately, it can be very difficult to get your cat to accept a change in food types and texture.

- Aonuma thanks the audience for the award - Aonuma: The team did not want to simply adapt the old formula of Zelda games, and they carefully balanced old and new elements - Fujibayashi: The dev team had several challenges while developing; worked hard to satisfy gamers; is happy to see Germany loving it - Takizawa: Artstyle has changed often throughout the series» history; the art team's experience has been applied to the game, that's why the whole team is very happy about the award - Dohta: The team created lots of fun elements for the players, and the whole technical team is very happy to see Germany loving the game - Aonuma: «We are honored to accept the price in the name of over 300 developers who worked hard and passionately on the game for years - Everybody: «Vielen Dank!»

- starts you off in a small town - in town you can visit shops, talk to people and accept a quest - the quest puts you in the middle of a volcano - your end goal is defeating the gigantic fire beast Ifrit - team up with a Goblin and Chocobo - fight multiple enemies, including some unfriendly Chocobo - enemies leave behind loot like recovery items and materials for crafting - by pressing L or R, you get access to four attacks - attack names include Plunder Slash, Mercurial Thrust and Trinity - charge a power meter and then hit L+R at the same time for special movies - one special lets you change into Cloud with very powerful attacks - run with the B - button - camera switching is handled by the D - Pad - info on the upper screen that gives you constant battle updates - bottom screen shows the status of all the characters, plus a map

Contrary to previous years, when citizens from all over the globe were welcomed in Europe, immigration policies changed and the very few that managed to pass the borders and find settlement in those EU countries that accepted them, had to deal with a xenophobic pandemic, one that was solidified with the terrorist attacks executed by ISIS and Daesh followers in France, Belgium and Germany.

Whether there is a divide between weather and climate scientists out in the field, the meteorological society's official 2007 statement on climate change very clearly accepted that people are jogging the system: «[S] trong observational evidence and results from modeling studies indicate that, at least over the last 50 years, human activities are a major contributor to climate change.»

But we are supposed to think that that's irrelevant because immediately after experimenters told them «97 % of scientists accept climate change,» a group of study subjects, while not changing their own positions on whether climate change is happening, increased by a very small amount their expressed estimate of the percentage of scientists who believe in climate change?

There are plenty of reasons to respond rationally to the very rapid changes in climate (rapid in geological terms) over the last few centuries, whether you accept they are man - made or not.

The unwillingness to accept the outcome of logic is to me a fatally flawed as this is the very method of reasoning that you claim to use, except, it seems, when it does not agree with your illogical anthropogenic climate change denialism.

i think that's inaccurate shx, the scientists did their work, and from what i could gather tried very hard not to overstate their case, the media did the scare - mongering and the media have then turned like the whores they are in the other direction, al gore's film upped the tempo and although it seemed like a good thing at the time, i think with hindsight it was a poisoned chalice, but lets be clear, doing research in multiple areas and having the results point to potentially catastrophic climate change and asking for changes to be made to avert this is not scare - mongering, its common sense, accepting that their is margin for error but erring on the side of caution since the stakes are life on earth as we know it is not scare - mongering, it is the application of the precautionary principle and common sense

I remain very concerned about abrupt climate change, but I am also working to demonstrate that if you accept the IPCC framing of the climate change problem, e.g. «forced», that models are over sensitive and the sensitivity is lower than inferred from climate models.

Institutional authority works very much like this, understanding and promoting the accepted wisdom, and it's only very occasionaly when someone dares to fly in the face of accepted wisdom, sometimes at great cost to their own «authority», that institutions are forced to change.

Here's what he said on climate change: «People get very emotional about this subject and I think we should just accept that the climate has been changing for centuries.

And then you have to accept that the climate models do a very poor job of predicting CO2 - AGW because the equation introduced by Lacis and Hansen in 1974 to predict cloud albedo change from pollution is useless even though Sagan derived it.

Presenting, in a very simple form, a number of arguments showing why everyone should accept that climate change is happening and is caused by mankind.

The increasing normalized trends in the U.S. were evident in convective storms, winter storms, flooding events and high temperature - related losses, and were almost statistically significant for hurricanes at the conventional 95 percent confidence level.3 In view of data like this, it's very hard to accept Pielke's confident assertion that «[n] o matter what President Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron say, recent costly disasters are not part of a trend driven by climate change.»

If we speak about the influence of the activity of the sun, even 50 years are to much delay to be accepted by AGW - scienists, even if we know that dansgaard oeschger events, triggered by very small changes in the activity of the sun, have delays of 100 years.

Within a few years, after his unprincipled, unsupported and unscientific attacks on climate «sceptics», my opinion had changed, to what it is now, that he's the very model of an unthinking and ill - informed little s ** t. Presenting «evidence» that you haven't checked out yourself is both irresponsible and unscientific, as is accepting «current thinking» or some form of consensus without questioning it in any way.

No less by the very people (climate scientists included) who hide behind their claims they accept the science of climate change and the urgent need for immediate actions which must include changes to Laws and Regulations directly related to energy production and use.

The rush to label any and all skeptics as either «liars for hire» or just plain ignorant dismisses the multitudes of honest, thinking people who simply want to put the «science» of AGW under the microscope before blindly accepting what appears (to many) to be very radical social and economic changes suggested as solutions.