Otherwise, we will once again fall into «groupthink» and
accept false premises and resultant delay in identifying solutions.
Not exact matches
The interesting thing about
accepting the
premise of supernatural being (s), is that you can apply perfect logic to a
false premise and the conclusions will almost always be
false.
What is frustrating is that both the «denier / sceptic» side of the AGW debate AND the «CAGW» side
accept the
false scientific
premise that fossil fuels, stored sunlight energy, are essentially unlimited.