Sentences with phrase «accept its conclusions on»

Even the personally non-religious might accept its conclusions on trust, much as blind persons now accept the facts of optics — it might appear as foolish to refuse them.

That can be learned from books and good articles, but telling, what source is most appropriate for some particular person is not possible, because that depends on the starting level of knowledge and on the willingness to accept conclusions on the basis of authoritative statements by experts.

Pekka you writes «on the willingness to accept conclusions on the basis of authoritative statements by experts»

Not exact matches

«Even if the evidence allowed that drivers were not obliged to accept all trips, the very high percentage of acceptances required justified the [lower tribunal's] conclusion that, once in the territory with the app switched on, Uber drivers were available to [Uber] and at its disposal.»

In 2017, Staley apologized to the Barclays board, and accepted its conclusion that his personal actions in the matter were errors on his part.

Perhaps the common - sense way to approach this is to accept the possibility that Chilean - style controls (taxes on short - term inflows) may be useful for some countries during the transition, but not too much should be expected of them (see the conclusions on Chile itself, which suggest that the controls managed to lengthen the maturity of the debt, without being able to prevent the exchange rate from appreciating during the phase of capital inflow)(see Edwards (1998)-RRB-.

You on the other hand take the hard line of absolutely not accepting anything at face value and draw a conclusion immediately.

Your claim has many parts that need to be accepted based on nothing but blind faith to come to your conclusion.

(On this and other points I am drawing on John J. McNeill's The Church and the Homosexual and John Boswell's Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality, though I do not accept all their conclusionsOn this and other points I am drawing on John J. McNeill's The Church and the Homosexual and John Boswell's Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality, though I do not accept all their conclusionson John J. McNeill's The Church and the Homosexual and John Boswell's Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality, though I do not accept all their conclusions.)

On the other side are «creationists,» who argue — against not only science but also those faiths that accept the compatibility of evolutionary biology and Sacred Writ — that the earth was created on or around Sunday, October 23, 4004 b.c., a conclusion based on a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth centurOn the other side are «creationists,» who argue — against not only science but also those faiths that accept the compatibility of evolutionary biology and Sacred Writ — that the earth was created on or around Sunday, October 23, 4004 b.c., a conclusion based on a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth centuron or around Sunday, October 23, 4004 b.c., a conclusion based on a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth centuron a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth century.

This conclusion is based on the following commonly accepted dating: Mark AD.

Scientists do not impose their ideas on nature; they accept what they find and publish their conclusions.

In relation to theological and social emphases on which conservative and liberal churches differ, research indicates long - run social trends toward (1) wider acceptance of the conclusions of valid empirical research, and (2) greater reluctance to accept the imperfections of existing social structures.

I cant praise God enough for the internet we cant be ignorant these if we want to learn anything all we have to do is to jump on the internet for answers since I have accepted Jesus as my personal savior thirty five years ago i cant stop myself to share my experience with people but since i lost my husband through a tragic accident my life took a different turn my savior became more personal and real to me i give myself full to the lord and the result of that people stat asking me for bible study which i have never done in my life so I decided to search the net and i came across your website which put the whole gospel in a simple way and i am going to use it for my first bible study and see how the holy spirit will lead from there.I came to the conclusion that our trials is a blessing in disguise and i praise God for it.keep up the good work God bless Martina keep me in prayer please

On the other hand, Thomas could not accept the view that the conclusions of philosophy should either replace the content of revelation or be regarded as untrue.

If his words were a whole lot of nothing and and his ideas on immigration are racist (the «wall trunks» are not racist IMO), then I understand and accept your conclusion.

In conclusion, «legality» basically means the legality of the existent of a state, but it doesn't really hold much meaning or value on the international stage while recognition means whether other countries accept you as a sovereign nation / state or do they count you as territory of another country.

WE all need to work on objectivity with our judgment and accept that our personal experiences with interacial interaction is not meant to draw conclusions about other races nor is it supposed to provide insight to future interaction.

If the report's conclusions are accepted by the African Specialist Group of the International Union for Conservation Nature (IUCN), the African elephant (Loxodonta africana) may be split into two species: L. africana, for those living on the savanna, and L. cyclotis, for those in the forest.

If you accept the leap of faith that a nonbiological entity that is convincing in its reactions to qualia is conscious, then you accept my conclusion that consciousness is an emergent property of the overall pattern of an entity, not the substrate it runs on.

Papers will be accepted solely on the basis of scientific rigor, adherence to technical and ethical standards, and evidence that the data support the conclusions.

Hi Mike, I assume from your name that you're vegan, so the good news is that if we accept the principle that ectopic fat stores are the underlying cause of the disease, and if we look to the results (i.e. those on low fat vegan diets with unrestricted carbohydrate intake are able to reduce or even eliminate insulin dosage) it follows as a reasonable conclusion that ectopic fat stores are in fact being reduced by such a diet.

The purpose of persuasive essay writing is to convince your readers to agree with your ideas, to accept your thoughts, to share your values, and to agree on conclusions.

I would feel much more comfortable on this point if he accepted the Russ Roberts Science challenge and have a section discussing the process by which he arrived at the process by which he arrived at his conclusions.

One reasonable conclusion, if you accept the two arguments above, is you should rely on stock managers who are not wedded to stocks.

The only caveat here is that the uninterrupted service does rely on the merchant accepting Apple Pay, which we all know isn't a foregone conclusion.

And if we accept that idea then there are two conclusions I think we can draw about the unhealthy reliance on Ocarina of Time's formula.

I actually have no problem with someone saying, «I accept that the experts have reached their conclusions based on sound evidence and reasoning as we best understand it today, but it's not enough to convince me because I think further research will overturn it.»

«EPA is relying most heavily on these synthesis reports because they... 3) have been reviewed and formally accepted by, commissioned by, or in some cases authored by, U.S. government agencies and individual government scientists and provide EPA with assurances that this material has been well vetted by both the climate change research community and by the U.S. government; and 4) in many cases, they reflect and convey the consensus conclusions of expert authors.»

If an honest person is made aware of an obvious and simple problem with their work they accept it and re-work, accepting what impact that may have on their conclusions with good grace.

One board member, however, refused to accept the standards as written, citing his own personal belief that human influence on climate change was not «a foregone conclusion.»

And yet, 400 years later, here we are: watching a public official tasked with guiding the educational trajectories of his community's children rail against the accepted science on climate change — because its conclusions threaten to undermine the local political culture.

All the people who bought into doctored statistics will just go on accepting the conclusions based on them.

If Mann forwarded the email with no intention on his part that any emails should be deleted, and if the gentlemen conducting the inquiry accepted that that was the fact of the matter, then the Penn State conclusion follows from the premises.

He does not accept the normal practice that summaries contain conclusions and brief statements on their level of certainty, while the support for that is presented in the text.

A true scientist should be skeptical and particularly skeptical of things that are opposite to accepted physics and most particularly skeptical about conclusions based on such ridiculously sparse data.

This question is designed to expose the ethical conclusion that nations who are put on notice by the most prestigious and responsible scientific organizations in the world that ghg emissions from their jurisdictions are causing great harm to vulnerable people around the world have an ethical duty to accept the burden of proof to prove that their ghg emissions are not causing harm.

What I find most surprising about the paper on my re-read and those who seem to have little problem accepting or at least finding no weaknesses of the indirect methodology used to make some rather far reaching conclusions is not that papers such as this one can get published, but the authoritative nature these articles seem to take on and particularly so when they are referenced in the IPCC reports.

On many fronts, scientists continue to be frustrated by the public's unwillingness to accept their conclusions.

Unless any of the many, many people who have argued against the conclusion that Jelbring's work is completely wrong and should have never been accepted in the first place wish to keep arguing, perhaps the more polite ones can concede in one last post and we can wrap this up and move on to N&Z, the «existence» of a real, live GHE, and maybe, just maybe, get to where the skeptical arguments on the list are much better informed and less likely to play fast and loose with the laws of nature or thermodynamics.

Climate science has been suffering from this rot for a long time, so long in fact that some even demand that their conclusions be accepted on faith without possibility of replication or audit!

However, I NEVER accept conclusions based on the statement of experts.

You assert to me: «The point is that if one is unwilling to ever accept the conclusions of scientific authorities on the matter, the debate can go on forever.

I'm also sceptical in the sense that I try to evaluate each issue on its merits, and to reach my own conclusions, rather than accepting or rejecting environmentalist claims holus - bolus.

Also, they clearly accepted this by saying that «these conclusions were based on climatic projections that were not as firm as those made at a global level».

As I understand it, they are defined by their effect on the collective thinking of a community, rather than by the fact that they falsify some previously accepted inductive conclusion.

Besides, a little logic goes a long way: If the published science is on the order of 1,000:1 in support of the ACC conclusion and if the natural observations not only confirm, but show they are inadequate in that they are far too conservative, then it is virtually impossible to accept that those hyping an anti-ACC message are doing so on ethical and moral bases.

On the first point, it is now apparently perceived as «bad» when scientists come to a conclusion that is robust enough to be well accepted by the majority.

On the question of infringement the court found that the evidence accepted by the court lead to the conclusion that neither Acadia nor the architect were involved in an unauthorized taking of the conceptual drawings.

According to the same newspaper report, the Pinellas - Pasco State Attorney's Office has said it's leaning toward accepting an insanity defense, based on doctors» conclusions and other circumstances surrounding the killing.