Sentences with phrase «accept on faith»

Now, are you able to explain what you think is wrong with their work, or do you just want us to accept on faith your slander of them?

The only way beyond it is to accept on faith that digital is growing in smaller markets but in hidden ways, then to step beyond that and start offering your products digitally.

We're supposed to accept it on faith because they're mismatched, they make goo - goo eyes at each other, and they sleep together.

You're just supposed to accept on faith that people have a male or female soul / essence and sometimes a female soul gets placed in a male body or vice-versa.

If you accept on faith the idea that you have a soul then, like Brad who said he accepts some things that are not falsifiable, the basis of your belief is conjecture or hypothesis at best.

I can not fully reject what I can not see but I also can not accept what others simply ask me to accept on faith.

Lilu, this is as opposed to all the Christians that tell me i'm going to burn in hell for all eternity not because of anything i do, but merely because i do not accept on faith alone that their unsupported version of god is right and all the other unsupported versions of god are wrong?

The fact that so many believe does not make the story true, it merely means that those believing the story seriously don't care if there is evidence to support it, they merely accept it on faith (belief without evidence).

Until that time, I will accept it all on faith, and leave the truth to another life and time.

The simple fact that Luke claims to have witnessed something no one person on earth can do, should require it to be opened to detailed observation and analysis, not accepted on faith.

How can one possibly discern between things that should be accepted on faith and things that shouldn't be

@Robert Once a given proposition has been accepted on faith, said proposition is no longer amenable to examination by reason.

Once a proposition has been accepted on faith, said proposition is no longer amenable to examination by reason.

In the end, you have a bunch of unfounded premises, accepted on faith, and to make it all short, we call them God.

The Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution can not be proven so they are not scientifically proven laws and are accepted on faith as true by some.

This can only be accepted on faith.

Christians claim to have the answers, they actually believe in a very specific God that can not be proven and has to be accepted on faith.

(I presumed that somewhere along the line his preacher put an extra zero after 80M and he just accepted it on faith.)

Remember — anything from the Bible that appears contradictory, absurd or immoral is either 1) Taken out of context 2) A translation error 3) A metaphor 4) The ineffable Way of God that must be accepted on faith.

As one slips down that slope, more and more must be accepted on faith, and less and less is open to scientific verification.

They can not be ignored or dismissed because of flaws in Mann's work, but they should all be carefully examined rather than accepted on faith.

Climate science has been suffering from this rot for a long time, so long in fact that some even demand that their conclusions be accepted on faith without possibility of replication or audit!

Not exact matches

Willingness to Accept Risk — I'm not talking about crazy risks, but entrepreneurs are people who are willing to start a business on a leap of faith.

He cited America's history of giving «sanctuary to desperate children for centuries,» the «blight on our national reputation» when we refused to accept Jewish children fleeing the Nazis in 1939, and his Christian faith as reasons for the decision.

Well, yeah... and I mean if what someone is really trying to achieve with this is to reduce practices that in any way, shape or form could indicate that someone bears them or their faith ill will... I don't think publicly humiliating people who would take the time to look up your dead ancestor's name and then take the time to drive to a temple and then get immersed in water on their behalf so that they (by their belief) have the option to accept your religion post mortem is really misguided and contrary to the spirit of freedom of religion in what it advocates.

If you have faith in Jesus and accept his sacrifice on the cross where he died for my and your sins, you will be saved and you can enjoy God's presence eternally.

It is a courageous outlook on a difficult situation that accepts the brutal facts of reality while maintaining an unwavering faith in the future hope and a commitment to prevail despite the brutal facts.

So as Chirstians when we ask Mormons if they accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, that they believe Jesus died and rose again on the third day to take away our sins and they say yes, they are not saying that they believe by confessing this that they automatically will live in the mansion where God the Father and Jesus Christ are and when they acknowledge our faith they don't believe that we will automatically be there based only on the blood of Jesus alone either.

Your claim has many parts that need to be accepted based on nothing but blind faith to come to your conclusion.

On philosophical grounds, this form of accommodationism is inadequate for purposes of dialogue because its portrayal of the other faith (whether by Jews of Christianity or by Christians of Judaism) is one that the other faith — in good faith — can not possibly accept about itself.

I accept nothing on faith.

I admired his refusal to accept defeat on matters that matter, his love of friends and enemies, his passion for the written word, and above all his faith and hope in God.

You are accepting this scripture on «faith».

But the percent of thepopulation who are ready to truly emotionally accept that we take, say, induction or external reality on faith is still very, very small.

Not quite tallulah, all the other gods are man invented or possibly demonic.Every other idol god either mimics God and or requires a series of works to gain their favor.They are created by men to appease the inner knowledge of God, but all fall short of the creator God.You can not work your way into Gods good graces, you can only be saved by faith through grace.God alone has resolved the sin problem we all suffer from, in the selfless sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross.It is by accepting Jesus» redemption for us that allows us to be reconciled with God.God bless

rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?

I accept nothing on faith and have evidence to back up everything I hold to be true with zero supernatural forces or agents involved.

This makes it difficult for non-believers to accept strictly on the basis of «faith.»

I will not accept ANYTHING on pure faith alone.

Imagine this: you're witnessing to someone in the community who is on the verge of accepting and professing faith in Christ.

Atheists refuse to accept the potential existence of any kind of deity simply based on the faith of the presenter.

But it is no more a cop - out than a blind person believing in the concept of «color» because the sighted person tells them it exists, and they are willing to accept it «on faith.»

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

As a traditionally minded Anglo - Catholic, I must say that the Catholic Church's strange new position on capital punishment is one major reason why I would find accepting Roman Catholicism, at best, a compromise with a defective faith.

So the faith of the individual who reasons with and accepts propositional truths in the present at one end and the experience of the individual, also in the present, at the other are both dependent on liberalism as are the attempts to combine the two somewhere along the line in between.

Soon he came to doubt the validity of infant baptism on the ground that it was unscriptural, and that a child could not consciously accept in faith the baptismal covenant.

After attending the conference I decided that the obsession with individual rights — the right to make money or to write, say or do what I please — should be exposed for what it is: a form of fundamentalism that accepts one worldview as absolute and rejects all others as encroachments on the true faith.

The seed on thorny ground represents those people who rejoice when they first hear the Gospel but accept it only to lose faith when tribulation arises.

Islam, with its simplicity of faith and clarity of doctrine, made a tremendous impression on the Hindu mind, and within the first twenty - five years many of the people, including the King of Malabar, had accepted the new religion.

Or perhaps like the poor gullible fool you are, you just accept things on faith knowing that nothing was written about this character until 30 - 40 years after death and knowing that stories told like that so many years after could very well hold little accuracy.