Sentences with phrase «accept the answer of»

I'll also accept the answer of «nothing» that will change your mind because at least we'll agree that since nothing can change your mind it's impossible to debate or even hold a discussion with you and we'll go our separate ways.

I can not accept the answer of the atheists who say that there is no God to speak about.

Nor can I accept the answer of the religionists who claim that we can and should simply continue to speak «religiously.»

You can even praise a child for something he did not do such as «I really liked how you accepted my answer of «no» and didn't lose your temper.»

I'm really not sure how this is pertinent, seeing as how the OP has accepted the answer of a thrown wheel weight.

Not exact matches

As often as not, the biggest hurdle isn't even coming up with an elegant and cost - effective solution; it's getting people to accept the prospect of change and to adopt your answer to the problem.

In the interests of smooth sailing, even seasoned veterans will accept superficial assurances and smiles instead of concrete answers, and will then go on to confuse good manners, pleasantries, and bad jokes with real agreement.

The most honest answer I can give is that I'm looking for maniacally driven individuals who are obsessive in their pursuit of an idea and who are so competitive and driven that they can't accept failure.

The University of Texas» McCombs School of Business and NYU's Stern School of Business both accept video responses to questions that allow candidates to choose from several different answer formats, including the traditional essay.

The essence of this particular dilemma lies in answering this initial question: Even if the upside appears to be a sure thing, can you afford to accept your fate in the event that the worse - case scenario of a life decision implodes on you?

But perhaps the best answer may be for you (and me) to accept waiting as an essential part of life.

It basically answers the question of how poor a deal are we willing to accept before we bail.

Forgive those of us who don't accept you 2 +2 = 5 answer.

Religion knows it can't stand up to any sort of rational test, which is why it makes a virtue out of faith — not questioning and accepting whatever answers you're given.

When they don't accept an answer that doesn't parrot their belief, they accuse others of twisting and shouting aka doing the chubby checker.

Fred, I accept that people have the right to believe whatever they want, but I will never be happy for people who chose the ignorance of religion instead of curiosity and the desire for real answers.

when you all turn into hypocrites is when i get upset... its like black people creating black history month... what if a white person did that... then it would be racist... gay people want to be accepted and not hated on... the answer is not to turn around and hate and attack everyone else... really humans in america are fuct... no way out of it... you have all entangled yourself in a web of hate... grow up

However there are those of us who accept that we can't possibly have all the answers to the atrocities and unknown's in this world.

rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?

I experience miracles and answered prayer none of which a skeptic will accept nor would I have accepted such accounts prior to that point when the Holy Spirit began to reveal a reality governed by what is not scientifically falsifiable.

It may not be the cleanest or most satisfying answer to say that we can not fully understand God, so we need to learn to accept it, but it is part of the answer.

But, if you find an answer not deemed «correct» by your religion, and accept it as the truth, then won't you probably find yourself outside of that faith?

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

Furthermore, they seem happy to accept one unanswered question in return for being able to use God to answer any number of other questions, at least until better answers can be found through science and reason.

Non-believers see a godless world, walk with the things of man, accept only the proof of man, can not see miracles, can not see answered prayer and basically have only the presence and perspective of Richard Dawkins bible.

The same reasons BC condemns the readers and contributors to this forum — that we think, question, use our own God - given intelligence and reasoning skills, don't accept the easy answers, and are accepting of differences which create no harm — are the very things that make that notion quite bizarre.

But the Palestinians» supported by the major Arab powers» would not take yes for an answer and refused a deal, even a deal that would accept a number of Israeli concessions and leave other matters open for further discussion.

In this study of Genesis 4:4 - 5, we look at some of the theories of why God rejected Cain's offering, and then seek an answer to this question by looking at why God accepted Abel's offering, and what this tells us about Cain's offering.

I fully accept that the accused have every right to answer in their own defense, and for the few who have availed themselves of the opportunity in this thread by showing humility and grace, those answers and the subsequent apologies have been accepted with equal measures of grace.

I wish some Calvinist would answer why do you accept this belief system just because you believe in the sovereignty of God doesn't mean He doesn't allow things to happen by its own accord

@Mark Faith is the willing suspension of critical thinking in order to be able to accept dogmatic, rote answers as «Truth».

If I accept once again that Catholicism has all the answers, then it is likely that I will have to do violence to certain elements in my nature — the conviction, for instance, that all life is one, or that it is better to have polygamy than the starving widows of soldiers begging in the streets.

I am using the term «dialectic» in its ancient and etymological sense, and it seems appropriate to describe the process by this word; for instead of an aprioristic, deductive method of procedure, the process was one of answering questions and objections as they arose, not in anticipation, and not as the unfolding, more geometrico, of a system implicit within a body of axioms or first principles which one needed only accept and then all the rest followed logically to the final Q.E.D..

I won't discuss any of the topics you have raised, but I will only encourage you to ask questions, challenge every single doctrine, and (as much as is possible) refuse to accept any single side of an issue without investigating other reasonable answers as well.

I guess the answer will be NO... no one can deny the past whether it was ten years or hundreds... now the question is to believe in the past, there are diff opinions, here comes the question which one to believe... what are the criterias to use in order for me to accept one out of many... we have to use our intellect in this regards...

But in answering this question, in accepting the word of preaching as the word of God and the death and resurrection of Christ as the eschatological event, we are given an opportunity of understanding ourselves.

@God hates religion, since Jesus promises that whatever we ask for, if we have faith we shall receive, I am afraid no person of faith should be willing to accept «No» as an answer from God.

If you are a person of faith, and you ask what causes wind, and the answer is wind comes from the divine, you are willing to accept that as an answer.

Where faith invites the Holy Spirit to participate in human decisions, in answer to God's invitation to participate in God's work of creating human beings, Africans accepted to be unmade, Christianized, catholicized, presbyterianized and pentecostalized as a price to pay for the salvation of their souls.

And that's really the sad part... if you just accept them as the stories they are... of humans trying to understand what this life is all about and making answers to fit their environment and circ.umstances, then the contradictions simply confirm just how wonderfully human we are... There are some great stories.

@Souptwins It does indeed take a great deal of effort to suspend rational thinking and engage in the double - think needed to accept dogmatic, rote answers to life's difficult questions.

And perhaps due to a lack of answers we choose to weave a story to answer everything instead of accept the facts!

For example --- when I have asked Calvinists to interpret the majority of the Scripture, that reeks with the implication «that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject what is being communicated to them from God» from their «no inherent ability of man to accept / believe or reject» perspective, the usual answer I get is along this line is: «Yes, God communicates with man in a style that implies that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject what is being communicated to them from Him, but God knows that man does not have that inherent ability.»

The student is invited to fill in the blank or, more commonly, to accept the answer provided by the writer of the textbook who simply knows, as everybody supposedly knows, that «traditional» belief and morality are no longer relevant.

Having settled into a comfort zone where I acknowledge my belief that one one in our lifetime is going to answer this question, I have chosen to live life accepting of others» views, even if I disagree with them.

You can not be a good scientist when you accept mythology as a basis of an answer.

Tom's presence at church has been a test of my faith — the ever - present question mark that has not let me accept easy answers and avoid uncomfortable conversations.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

When we asked the seminary deans about God as defined by Leuba, 92 percent accepted the definition: God is one «to whom one may pray in expectation of receiving an answer.»

We base what we accept as fact off of the evidence and we do not claim to have an answer when there isn't one to be had.