José Mourinho declared the case brought against him for alleged tax fraud to be closed after
he accepted the arguments put forward by Spain's Inland R -LRB-...)
This effectively
accepts the argument put forward by the For the rest of this article please go to:
Not exact matches
Any
argument that includes threats for not
accepting the
argument is weak... and those
putting forth those
arguments are pea brained nincompoops
For me it is not about an
argument or debate with you people, it is about
putting Jesus's Salvation forward as to gift to whom ever shall choose to
accept it, and be saved in Jesus's name, so that he may not perish eternally.
«It is one that is not going to happen and I think that those backbenchers who keep
putting forward those sorts of ideas should just come out and
accept that what they really want is for Britain to leave the European Union because that is the
argument they are actually making.»
It is easily forgotten that many Labour left - wingers — including Dennis Skinner —
accepted this
argument in 2010 when they
put electability before ideology in supporting David Miliband.
«From the Brexiteers and Government point of view, they have to
accept there is a large section of the population in this country, a large membership in the Lords and the Commons, who won't
accept some of the extreme
arguments being
put forward and think the voice of reason must prevail for the good of our country.»
After
putting forth a highly - spirited
argument to justify the need for Parliament to
accept the agreement tabled before them by a joint parliamentary committee, the Speaker Prof. Mike Oquaye decided to take a voice vote.
For the sake of the
argument — «if pigs could fly,» as Wilk
puts it, he says he'll
accept their data, their theory, and other predictions that can be derived from them.
But seriously I'd say everyone can make a contribution by
putting all political
arguments aside on scientific issues, although I do
accept that on policy issues they can't be.
What
put me off for so long from
accepting this, was the risible
arguments from sites like «skeptical science» and the innumerate rants of so many commenters on sites like this one.
The Crown
accepted the
argument and position
put forth by Joseph Neuberger and as a result the charges were withdrawn.
In somewhat the same vein,
put up a hand if you're in favour of a new rule of lawyer's professional conduct which states that lawyers acting for the winning side in a law suit are allowed to comment on the merits of the result for the media — print, electronic, and otherwise — only if the lawyers concede, on the record, that the decision is wrong on the facts and the law, and that they were surprised (nay, astonished, flabbergasted, etc) that any of their
arguments were
accepted by the judge.
The
argument puts pressure on both Ledger and its millions of users, who had until now broadly
accepted the company's claims its wallets were 100 % secure.