Sentences with phrase «accept the claim on»

On May 25, 2016, Kobayashi stopped accepting claims on lost funds, rejecting JPY 263.4 trln ($ 2.4 trln) worth of claims, leaving Mt. Gox with JPY 45.6 mln ($ 42.7 mln) of liabilities to creditors.

Not exact matches

The ACCC must be very naive indeed to accept the Water Corporations innocent explanation, they have been taken to task on hundreds of occasions about their claims that the Kwinana RO Plant was run exclusively on renewable energy.

It's possible that Constand may have benefited from the #MeToo momentum on Thursday, but it took an extra dose of courage for her to make her claims years ago, in an environment that was so much less accepting.

To qualify for this guarantee: (i) you must have filed your original 2017 federal income tax return through Credit Karma Tax on or before April 16, 2018; (ii) you must be entitled to a federal tax refund from the IRS; (iii) you must have filed an amended federal income tax return using the same Tax Return Information through another online tax preparation service; (iv) your amended return must have been accepted by the IRS; (v) you must submit your complete Max Refund Guarantee claim to Credit Karma Tax no later than December 31, 2018; and (vi) the larger refund can not be attributed to claims you make on your tax return that are contrary to law.

Waiving PAYGO now on the grounds that the AMT's growth was «unanticipated» would accept a false claim — that the growth of the AMT was not expected or intended — and would reward the budget gimmickry used in designing the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.

Under the pleadings standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, which if accepted as true, states a «claim to relief that is plausible on its face.»

The statement goes on to label the public vilification it has faced since a joint Guardian and Channel 4 exposé in March as based on «unfounded accusations,» claiming their activities are not only legal but also «widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising.»

Due to the large number of these provisions, it's probably a good idea to hold off on filing your return if it includes any item that would have qualified for a deduction or credit that expired at the end of 2016, until you can determine whether that item was extended — and whether the IRS is ready to accept a return claiming that tax benefit.

The period for filing bankruptcy claims was set to end on May 29, 2015, but the bankruptcy trustee has been accepting filings of bankruptcy claims after the expiry of the said period.

The simple fact that Luke claims to have witnessed something no one person on earth can do, should require it to be opened to detailed observation and analysis, not accepted on faith.

Your claim has many parts that need to be accepted based on nothing but blind faith to come to your conclusion.

Homosexual people will be accepted as equal, full human beings, who have a legitimate claim on every right that both church and society have to offer any of us.

If the group in questions claims it is what it is then why can't everyone just accept it and move on?

I don't know that there are no gods anywhere in the universe, however I do not find any of the claims of gods here on Earth compelling enough to accept as factual.

Wrenn, if you're still watching this particular post, I'm curious about your opinion on my thought of students claiming «financial discrimination» if private schools stopped accepting Pell grants.

@ total non sense Perhaps we're splitting hairs here, but I was trying to be kind by implying that rather than treating religiosity as a mental disability, for which the supposedly clinically sick can receive insurance benefits and evade personal actionable responsibility by claiming illness, it would be better to treat religiosity as a societal functional disorder which can be addressed through better education and a perceptional shift towards accepting scientific explanations for how the world works rather than relying on literal interpretations of ancient bronze age mythologies and their many derivations since.

I accept his claim to being Christian on the same basis as I do yours.

Claiming to be founded on the Scripture, it has, as a matter of fact, completely surrendered many Scriptural frameworks of thinking and has accepted the Greek counterparts instead.

Although, the various orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy have different views about the nature of Vedic revelation, they accept the authority of the Vedas and claim that that their thinking is based on these scriptures.

On the one hand, he claims to have deduced all the categories of thought, rather than merely accepting them uncritically as paralleling the «judgments» of the «traditional» logic.

Reinforcing in advance the claim I have put forth at the end of Part Two, Hartshorne went on to point out: «Just as the Stoics said the ideal was to have good will toward all but not in such fashion as to depend in any [221] degree for happiness upon their fortunes or misfortunes, so Christian theologians, who scarcely accepted this idea in their ethics, nevertheless adhered to it in characterizing God.»

Society was by this time well prepared to accept this measure although it was claimed that it was not at all the same as marriage despite being modelled very closely on the Marriage Act.

Accepting the most extraordinary claims imaginable based on nothing more than a collection of this mythology that was cobbled together during the Dark Ages is a pretty foolish thing to do.

I have a thought for your kind consideration: If you really believe that each person should be accountable for his deeds ONLY, then by the same logic, you must accept the fact that it is gross injustice to claim that Jesus took everyones sins on his shoulders.

Richard Bernstein calls this approach pluralistic: not a «flabby» pluralism, where we simply accept a variety of perspectives, vocabularies, paradigms, and language games, each on an equal footing; nor a «fortress - like» pluralism, where disparate groups work out of isolated frameworks and there is no communication between them; but rather an «engaged pluralism» where we acknowledge our fallibility and try to be responsive to the claims of others.

The grounds on which church authorities resisted the advancing claims of the sciences were in the first place simply that they were at variance with the accepted teachings handed down from ancient times.

He accepted the historical - critical method of biblical studies, rejected some traditional theological claims on the basis of their incredibility to a critical mind, assumed a religious optimism, championed individualism, accepted evolutionary categories, emphasized ethics, stressed the humanity of Jesus, and recognized the importance of toleration.

Acceptance by Jews of our chosen status — when we do accept it — is much more an acceptance of God's electing claim on us than a demand that the world recognize our this - worldly superiority, whether moral, political, or even religious.

Christians claim to have the answers, they actually believe in a very specific God that can not be proven and has to be accepted on faith.

You see, we atheists have this thing about requiring proof before blindly accepting what — on the surface at least — sound like ridiculous claims.

Islam also claims Jesus asked for a volunteer to die for him on the cross, asking 3 times, and each time some young guy stood up and said he'd die for Jesus, Jesus accepted and then floated through the ceiling as the soldiers arrived....

On what grounds can we claim to accept God's promise of eternal life and then reject the Scripture's claim that the sign of God's promise is the empty tomb?

Accept that their god performs «miracles» but discount the same claims of the other 80 % of humanity and their miracle performing gods, based on identical «evidence».

Honestly, I have no reason to doubt that President Obama sincerely embraces Christianity, although I disagree with him on key issues within the faith and politics, issues that I think are reflected in doubt and a hesitance to accept his claim amongst evangelicals.

In light of such claims, it is perhaps not surprising to encounter these study questions on the scrolls: «Describe the impact of this discovery on those who do not accept the authenticity of the Bible» and «Determine the evidence from the Dead Sea scrolls confirming the claims of Jesus as the Bible describes him.»

He is willing to accept Messianic Jews» claim that they are still Jews as long as they act like Jews by obeying the Torah, keeping kosher, observing the holidays, circumcising their sons, and so on.

So does this mean that I can claim discrimination when, say, the jazz band refuses to accept me on the basis that I don't play an instrument and don't want to play an instrument?

I had to learn to look beyond smiling faces, empty rhetoric, to asking myself why those who want to get very close very quickly or those who say one thing like claiming no strict rules about becoming a full accepted member somewhere only later on to start hearing of expectations and the guilt tripping brain - washing used.

This claim, in theory and practice, is as exclusive as any made by certain religions in history, and has the same tragic consequences on the life of other people who refuse to accept such claims.

I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....

strictly, and it has been accepted that the burden of proof always lies on the claim to authenticity.

That John MacArthur is taking a stand on the basis of truth, forcing people to accept or refute his claims is of benefit to «the church» (as he says — «truth divides»).

On the other hand, the majority of Jews refused to accept the Christian kerygma, and in time their persistent refusal became an embarrassment to the church and an apparent refutation of the Christian claim that Jesus was the Messiah.

Recognizing that I will not agree with his parity claim, Hasker closes his argument by commenting on my discussion about the need for a theodicy to have psychological appeal, seeking to turn this discussion to his favor by pointing out that traditional theism has been accepted by more people than has process theism.

Since we are bombarded daily by the mass media with news and views on the economy and economic policies, it is necessary to be trained to demythologize the claimed orthodoxies of economists, academics, policy makers and media programmes, as is accepted in the case of the stories of the scared scriptures.

It claims some missteps (Samuel's push for price signalling bans on banking chiefs and his readiness to accept «the wholesale monopoly» of the NBN), highlights some controversy (including the claims of conflict of interest regarding the DFO and the ACCC's pursuit of Richard Pratt) but concludes that overall «Mr Samuel's energy and focus have resulted in an expansion of the size and the powers of the ACCC, which has also developed a clearer pro-market approach than it had under his predecessor, Alan Fels»

Chelsea are closing in on a deal to sign Everton defender John Stones, with Goal claiming that the Toffees have accepted that the youngster is likely to leave if a reported # 30m bid is made by the West London side.

The Gunners fought off interest in the Chile international all summer, though BBC Sport claimed they accepted a bid from City on deadline day before changing their mind on letting him go as they failed to bring in a replacement.

Arsenal were truly awful from top to bottom but instead of cheerfully accepting that and enjoying the fact that they got the Gunners on a bad day, the Monaco manager Leonardo Jardim and striker Dimitar Berbatov chose to rub salt into our wounds by claiming that it was their tactical nous that caused the shock result.

Candreva has also been linked with a move to Inter but Conte remains hopeful of stealing a march on the Nerazzurri, while it's claimed that a # 130,000 - a-week contract over three years has been accepted by Bonucci and his agents already.