Sentences with phrase «accept the country did»

but by our refusal to accept the country didn't like our handling of the country post 2005

Not exact matches

Trump's widely reported comment, which the White House did not deny, came Thursday during a bipartisan meeting with lawmakers on immigration in which he used the term to describe Haiti and African countries and instead expressed an interest in accepting immigrants from countries like Norway, whose prime minister he had spoken with the day before.
«You are the most diverse class in Northeastern's history — in other words, you are Donald Trump's worst nightmare... I think that everything that we've lived and learned tells us that we will never come out on top if we accept advice from soundbite salesmen and carnival barkers who pretend the most powerful country on Earth can remain great by looking inward and hiding behind walls at a time that technology has made that impossible to do and unwise to even attempt.
Last year, the figure was 333,000, of which 184,000 came from the E.U. Even if you accept, as most do, that immigration has expanded the tax base and kept the price of both food and services down, the influx — for which there is no end in sight — is changing the face of the country too fast for the population to stomach, and the E.U.'s rules on free movement of labor are an easy target.
Many shops, restaurants and bank branches refuse to handle cash because of how little consumers use it, with retailers putting up signs to say they don't accept cash payments all over the country.
«If you are a conservative talk show host, which I am, if you don't accept that it's likely Hillary Clinton has taken part in multiple murders, or that Barack Obama is a Muslim extremist sympathizer who was probably born outside this country — if you don't accept those two things, it's almost as if you're a sellout.
Spain could therefore either use the imported German capital to (a) increase domestic investment (which it did in the form of a real estate bubble)(b) binge on consumption and sharply reduce its savings as a function of GDP (which it also did)(c) accept higher unemployment (which it is now forced to do) which forces GDP to fall faster than consumption falls or (d) try to emulate Germany by passing off a trade imbalance at the expense of the rest of the world (which Europe as a whole is trying to do and which will go nowhere in the long run because only one country is even remotely capable of accepting such massive inflows, and it is increasingly unwilling to import the unemployment caused by German and Asian policies).
«In general for business cards, we can accept the application as long as the country of operations is U.S. and they primarily do business in the U.S.» says Bank of America spokesperson Betty Reiss.
So if you're in a developed country and you understand what bitcoin is and you don't want charge backs and you don't want to accept credit cards, at least accept my bitcoin.
And when we say all around the world, we do mean it: the platform accepts clients from Europe, Russia, United States and many other countries.
Saturday's rallies, organizers said, were attempting to demonstrate a show of force in that debate: Many citizens do not automatically want their nation's economy to expand (it's an almost universally - accepted idea in modern economics that expanded trade will provide net economic expansion to both countries) but instead they care how those benefits are distributed.
Although HighLow does not accept traders from the USA, traders from these countries can still trade in binary options using an array of reputable online binary options brokers that accept traders from the USA.
Most U.S. investors don't realize this, but the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) didn't start accepting clinical trial data generated outside the country until the second half of last year.
First, traditional crowdfunding platforms do not accept projects from countries where they have no presence.
I guess if they said Obama didn't do enough for the country this I can accept.
Maybe not quite similar, because the religion you accept does depend on some arbitrary factors out of our control, such as the country of our birth.
So far, like past predictions of America's accepting the metric system and adoption of soccer as a national pastime because, after all, all the other countries are doing it, we're still waiting for that to happen.
For the sake of simplicity the generally accepted Arabic spelling of names and technical terms has been followed, although in a few cases it seemed to do less violence to follow a form which has gained wide acceptance in a particular Muslim country.
modern day europe: liberal democracies accept poor people from muslim countries, and what do they want to do?
This country does not oppose God blatantly as you claim in fact it accepts God just like it accepts Allah, Buddha, Xenu, etc..
I don't see you being particularly nice and accepting in implying that Christians should leave the country.
This coming from a country in which we pass laws banning the wearing of the hajib because we do not accept the Muslim.
Just because there are a very tiny minority of churches that accept gay people, does not equal out the huge anti-gay religious movement around the country and world.
Earlier this year, Iraq made a deal with the US to accept deportees — which it hadn't done since 2010 — if the US would take it off the list of seven countries on Trump's travel ban.
Clearly they don't mind the hypocrisy in conservative Christians accepting money from billionaires who own casinos in Las Vegas and many other countries where all kinds of gambling and debauchery occur.
You do realize that's accepted culturally in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and other Islamic countries ruled by Sharia.
The youth of this country are being programmed into accepting these sick people as well as being programmed to have no free thinking, comply, conform, do not question authority no individualism there are no looser's.
Just because we see countries with some of these things accepted doesn't mean that it is good.
That changed when, as part of a deal to be removed from President Donald Trump's seven - country travel ban, Iraq agreed to once again begin accepting deportees — something the war - ridden nation hadn't done since 2010.
Equally some countries, such as Zimbabwe, refuse to accept detainees who did not return voluntarily when first asked.
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
When do people here accept that white «pilgrims» came to a country with a thriving culture and returned their hospitality with massacre..
It also plainly says things like: I can own slaves (as long as they're from neighboring countries), can sell my daughter into slavery, declares that people that work on Sunday should be put to death, etc. yet we don't accept those things.
Please exit this Site immediately if you do not accept these Terms of Use, are not of a legal age for consuming alcoholic beverages in the country or other territory in which you are located, or are accessing our Site in a country or other territory where use of our Site is not permitted.
Many gardeners have no choice about composting because many landfills across the country do not accept organic yard refuse — such as grass clippings.
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
Ken I accept that the players are responsible and there is no excuse for the debacle such as at Swansea last week.Of course Wenger didn't coach them to make these mistakes but when it is week in week out you have no option other than to look at the root of who where and why and it alls comes down on Wenger.These are all very good players who have all played and play international football for their respective countries, so the odd mistake is part and parcel but it is more than this and the evidence is there in black and white for all to see.
com, i contacted him about my issue and what i want, i don't know how he did but my Boyfriend was on his kneel begging me to accept him back, i forgave him and took him back, this is unbelievable State: San Bernardino Country: United States...............
I live in France, and in this country public daycare management makes us believe they are doing us a favor by accepting our children.
If Germany has legal right to accept millions of refugees and spread them around Europe using relocation schemes - then what stops any other EU country to do the same?
Another thing that many people perhaps do not understand is that the fact that a refugee has been accepted (or registered) in one country does not give them the automatic right to go anywhere in Europe.
Countries typically don't want more refugees than they absolutely have to accept (and, in spite of what you might have heard, that very much include Germany) but there is nothing preventing them from providing protection to anybody who meets the definition if they want to.
It is therefore reasonable for me to assume that the state of fear and panic that has engulfed us has more to do with how we have gone about this here rather than any remotely tangible evidence based on the experience of 55 countries that have accepted hostages, After all, ours is the one and only transfer that has generated such noise and fury in the citizenry and attracted international interest.
I don't think plural voting would be considered a less democratic system, if we were able to come up with a balanced (or at least apparently balanced) and (mostly) frictionless way of determining who gets the extra votes, similarly to how forms of weighted voting are not generally considered undemocratic and are practised and widely accepted in several democratic countries and institutions.
Does it accept Putin's assertion of a right to protect so - called Russian compatriots in any bordering country?
Private briefing I've seen makes this clear: «The EU has free trade deals with dozens of countries that do not have to accept the supremacy of EU law or pay billions to the EU.
This means that countries, like Greece, that can not or don't want to accept refugees, have many ways to refuse them.
Look at Germany, they said: «we accept everybody», but they haven't actually done anything to ease their journey, leaving thousand of people disorderly roaming European countries.
In conclusion, «legality» basically means the legality of the existent of a state, but it doesn't really hold much meaning or value on the international stage while recognition means whether other countries accept you as a sovereign nation / state or do they count you as territory of another country.
Speaking to the issue as a panelist on Peace FM's «kokrokoo» programme, Samuel Awuku, a Deputy Communications Director of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) has asked the President not to be liberal as far as the issue is concerned; thinking that if he does not accept homosexuality, the country will be disadvantaged in terms of development.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z