Sentences with phrase «accept the differences between»

The StART Up Art Fair «s Selection Committee, stalwarts of the Southern California scene, seemed to accept the difference between typical art / craft fair staples and what some of us look for in our museums, galleries, alternative spaces, and studio visits with equanimity in the process of the selection of artists.

Stubbs» work brings into question, in a very straightforward manner, the traditionally accepted differences between sculpture and painting.

That you refuse to accept this difference between Rossander's fit and mine suggests that I must have hit a nerve here.

Every couple will have at least a few stubborn differences; it is vital that couples compromise when they can but also learn to accept the differences between them.

Not exact matches

According to Kolanovic, the major difference between markets and Uber is that when the going gets tough for a traveler, they can elect not to accept a ride.

This will strongly influence the Seller and may make the difference between the Seller accepting your offer or someone else's — even if your offer is lower!

For example, if you're choosing between a 10 - year adjustable - rate mortgage and a 30 - year fixed, and the difference in mortgage rate is 12.5 basis points (0.125 %), you may feel that there's little reason to accept the risk of an adjustable - rate loan.

The fundamental difference between Ethereum and Bitcoin is that Bitcoin is just a currency, while Ethereum is a technology that is accepted by worldwide companies and it is used for building new programs.

Largely I would echo what Christine has already said about the way in which we feel accepted within our community, but if you'll bear with me for a little bit, I'd like to attempt to explain to Trey in particular what I see as the difference between this type of acceptance and the attitude of the many Christians who view homosexuality as sinful such as what you have encountered with your sister.

The one exceptional difference between them all is that the Bible clearly explains that the only way to escape eternity in literal hell fire that goes on forever and ever, is to accept the free gift of salvation that is only found in Jesus Christ the creator of all that you can see and can not see.

There is no difference between choosing to accept the «truth» of something like this than choosing to accept the «truth» of a religion.

John There is a big difference between accepting Jesus as an anointed of God, and accepting him as a demigod.

To assert an essential difference between women and men appears to turn the oppression of women on its head and to accept an oppressor's romantic definition of women.

This ground is, quite simply, Christian faith in Christ, for I am persuaded that no full or genuine understanding of Christ is possible so long as the scholastic principle that there is an essential and eternal difference between God and the world is accepted.

That is the difference between a saved person going to Heaven and a person who is not saved and is going to Hell, Have you accepted Jesus or rejected Him.

One big difference between Obama and Romney and their religions is how they accept Christians, which most Americans are.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

It's funny how people have become so brainwashed into accepting what is wrong but are against what is right, it's also funny how people can't tell the difference between difference of opinion and hatred.

Certainly we can not maintain this if we accept a metaphysical doctrine that refuses to admit any difference in kind between a living mind and a mechanical structure.

Those who accept traditional physics and thermodynamics look upon this sort of dividing as «releasing energy», although they are using the term «energy» equivocally here, in my» view, since in part they mean «matter» (the energy» retained in the parts), and in part they» mean the difference between the energy required to maintain the integrity of the form (or «system») before it was divided, and the energy left in the parts.

If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.

But constancy, perseverance, a long obedience in one direction — this, of course, is precisely the difference between acting a role and accepting a role as a vocation.

On a serious note, the difference between Christians and Atheists is really who you accept doctrine from.

The anima mundi, to whose disposal of his own personal destiny the Stoic consents, is there to be respected and submitted to, but the Christian God is there to be loved and the difference of emotional atmosphere is like that between an arctic climate and the tropics, though the outcome in the way of accepting actual conditions uncomplainingly may seem in abstract terms to be much the same.

There is a difference between a more accepting attitude about sexual relationships outside of marriage and advocacy of «free love»!

The only difference between Christians and non-Christians is that Christians have accepted and are called to testify to what God has done for all humanity, and non-Christians have not yet accepted.

Is it really necessary today to remind intelligent people, whether Christians or not, that there is a difference between recognizing that such a view was held by Socrates and accepting it, between recognizing a hope as primitive Christian and sharing it oneself?

The major difference between accepting a scientific explanation and a religious one is evidence.

The only real difference between views 2 - 4 is how they arrive at an explanation for why we just need to accept what the Bible says and move on.

Only someone who accepts individualism as the highest good would be so confident that there is an obvious qualitative difference between the «freely chosen» decision to die made by a person facing a terminal illness and a decision made by a physically healthy but mentally tormented individual.

However, his reformulation of relativity was not accepted by physicists, no doubt because he was never able to show any confirmable difference between the predictions of observable fact derived from his theory and that of Einstein.

There is a difference between «believing» in something and accepting that the physical evidence is overwhelmingly in support of a specific theory.

One of the differences between science and religion is that a scientist is willing to change his understanding of the world in the face of new facts while a religious believer accepts only facts that support his beliefs.

The difference between Jews and Christians today is whether Jews accept the fulfillment of their scriptures in Jesus, their Messiah.

The difference between the atheist is that he / she accepts the sad reality while the religious perform incantations and rituals to somehow justify to themselves that they are going to live forever.

Basic differences between Mill and Hartshorne are to be found, not in their principles of morality, but in the reasons each offers for accepting a utilitarian moral theory.

First, I accept the Tarski truth definition, and therefore I agree that «no difference [or at least none of major importance] can be drawn between saying that it will be true that snow is white and that it is true that snow will be white.»

(17) a discussion of the meaning of equality between women and men, Rank declared that the only real equality is «the equal right of each individual to become and to be himself, which actually means to accept his own difference and have it accepted by others.»

Rockenstein found that there were significant differences in information acquisition and attitude change between churched children and non-churched children: churched children gained more of the information and accepted more of the attitudes communicated by the televised programs than did the non-churched children.

Loyal comments BUT they choose to ignore that against better teams than inept Everton those costly mistakes you think we «should not focus on», make the difference between really top sides and nearly ones who have talent but accept constant faults.

The difference between a Liverpool, Manchester United or Chelsea supporter is they don't accept what the media always throws down their throat.

As you said in your post before the game they were there for the taking YET we failed and even if the point is a good point here we are accepting second best Gervinho miss in the dying minutes of the game in just not good @ this level he had time / space to pick his spot and he blazed it horribly wide, and that's the difference between winners and runnersup.

The difference between the way I see the Daily Express and Daily Mail, and the way people who don't like Untold see Untold, is that I just accept that the Express and Mail, fanatical right wing papers that they are, are not going to be changed by me moaning about them.

So far we've discussed why you want to read this book, «should» thoughts causing power struggles, power struggles being futile when the person is engaged with the other person, the difference between being in charge and being in control, seeing and accepting the child you have, and forgiving our parents.

In an increasingly global and diverse world, how can we teach our children to accept and celebrate the differences between people?

But it's worth the time and effort to help your child see that there is a big difference between blaming others and accepting personal responsibility.

(I think the difference between that rate and Dr. Bradley's in - practice rate is that he would not accept patients unless they committed to following the diet and exercise plan.

There is a huge difference between accepting that a child could die, which is sadly true at some point, and choosing to risk killing them.

Your job for the next ten years or so is to help your child understand the difference between a real danger (accepting a ride from a stranger) and something that just feels like one (the «witch» in the space between the wall and his bed).

Your job over the next 10 years or so will be to help your child understand the difference between a real danger (accepting a ride from a stranger, or smoking cigarettes) and something that, disturbing though it may be, doesn't present an immediate or personal threat (a war being waged 5,000 miles away).