Sentences with phrase «accept the religion of»

When something can be created out of nothing I will accept the religion of Atheism as being true.

In general, children accept the religion of their parents without question, and then continue to practice it as adults.

Not exact matches

Brown was founded in 1764 on the then - unprecedented idea of accepting students regardless of religion.

Well, yeah... and I mean if what someone is really trying to achieve with this is to reduce practices that in any way, shape or form could indicate that someone bears them or their faith ill will... I don't think publicly humiliating people who would take the time to look up your dead ancestor's name and then take the time to drive to a temple and then get immersed in water on their behalf so that they (by their belief) have the option to accept your religion post mortem is really misguided and contrary to the spirit of freedom of religion in what it advocates.

This prejudice favouring traditional religions demonstrates a degree of imperial ethics... Sometimes, while not based on established jurisprudence, the perception is that we are prepared to challenge in the courts a newer religion with different belief structures but are prepared to accept the more established religions.

Yet you refuse to accept that the doctrine that they follow — the Quran — is a violent religion even though it specifically calls for the destruction of any one who refuses to accept the prophet Mohammed.

Fred, I accept that people have the right to believe whatever they want, but I will never be happy for people who chose the ignorance of religion instead of curiosity and the desire for real answers.

It is simply that you accept this one religion in FAVOR of all others.

A number of the major religions have even accepted this as you're not actually worshiping Buddha, just following his examples and teachings as to how to be a better person in life.

Without the influence of religion, we are free to accept people who are different from us and ideas that were once faith - based rejected.

Professionals or secularists within the UK or Western world will accept these religious tenets more sympathetically if they came from a faith they recognise, or indeed may once have been part of, more so than other newer religions.

Please accept the fact thath no matter what your religion, fearing, judging or hating other religions makes you part of the problem.

In religion, you have no option to ever verify any of the myths you're asked to accept.

Maybe not quite similar, because the religion you accept does depend on some arbitrary factors out of our control, such as the country of our birth.

Circular religious logic will still never fully justify the fact that religion asks for special rights and protections, which it gets, and then turns those rights and protections on other groups as a defense mechanism for when they are accused of discriminating... i.e. «We can choose who we accept and who we don't because of our beliefs... wait, what... how can you say you will not accept our religious organization, that's religious discrimination!»

This happened also when Constantine made Christianity the religion of the Roman Empire and needed to modify it to get everyone to accept it.

I haven't given up on them entirely: some of them will migrate toward religion as they accept some of life's responsibilities and meet some of life's challenges.

Because without their steadfast support of freedom of speech and religion, you run the risk of ending up in a theocracy that only accepts a religion other than your own.

There are even studies with pre-verbal children (haven't been socialized to religion yet) and other but non-human social animals that show that morality, if you accept that a sense of fairness and preferring «nice» over the opposite are proto - morals, then indeed it is evolution that makes it so.

The only way to find compatibility in such a worldview is by accepting a religion with no authority on the most meaningful matters of human existence.»

Most religions accept the concept of a God so schools should allow a non denominational prayer period teaching children that there is a higher being.

So, unless you are willing to accept your daughters from being excluded from education, your sons from being forced to pray to Allah in school, women being second class citizens, women being sent to prison for adultery after being raped, etc., you may want to consider what it truly means to have freedom of religion.

One thing abt the major religions is that they make U accept a ridiculously impossible thing as the center of one's faith like the nailing to a cross a human body & not having it tear away.

Some religions accept evolution as true and assume that god left it to run it course, with some» direction» of course.

Religion has little to do with ethics... for example... is it right for you to allow someone else to accept your just punishment... of course not, we do not allow that in our legal system, because it is not ethical... but your religion is based on that one unethical behavior.

My «problem» is that a so - called mainstream religion accepts the selling of 9 to 10 year old girls!!

Corrolary question: How can the state accept one religion's definition of marriage over anothers?

If it weren't for religion, I bet we'd be a lot less accepting of people's rights to brain - wash their children.

Teachings are accepted by the authorities of your particular religion and handed down over time.

That is, if Wilson's purely functionalist explanation of religion were to become widely accepted by religious people, it would then be rendered false» for the adaptive features of religions depend, on Wilson's account, upon religious people thinking it false that their religions are best understood as adaptive social organisms.

«Time and time again, people of faith routinely supress (sic) their logical thoughts and merely «accept» the religion that they are exposed to.»

I am neither a christian or muslim but what right do christians have in making fun of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses only difference being that other religions are open about their practices and even accept their mistakes..

I've known some brilliant people who accept the existence of a Deity, usually one that falls under an «organized religion.»

That doesn't make the theology more believable to discerning people, but it does provide evidence for the innocuousness of the faith which causes the greater society to accept it as a «mainstream religion».

There is no difference between choosing to accept the «truth» of something like this than choosing to accept the «truth» of a religion.

The second is where most «atheists» can be found... unwilling to accept the logical consequence of their utterly meanigless lives as atheists, they cite humanity as being self - transcendent, in the end, this becomes a religion with themselves as its god — think Nietzsche.

But, if you find an answer not deemed «correct» by your religion, and accept it as the truth, then won't you probably find yourself outside of that faith?

Islam has reached the bottom of cesspool, new generation would never accept Islam as a religion, but terrorist organization.

A Christian feminist can not accept all of the assumptions that are at the base of the new feminist religion.

I accept that the RCC is in competi.tion with other religions and sects of Christianity for souls, but it really seems over the top.

In this fashion, accepting the framework of Whitehead's metaphysics, it is possible to account for the justice of God which is basic to Biblical religion.

Furthermore, if the Christian teachings regarding salvation and necessity of accepting Jesus as your Savior is so critical, why have the vast majority of the worlds religions not contained that doctrine?

Today, the religions of Christendom display a similar disrespect for the truth of the Bible, by giving preference to scientific theories, such as the Catholic church accepting evolution.

Who has ever applied for a job and refused to accept it because of the owner's religion?

If that is NOT what you are suggesting, please explain in what ways — how and where — you would accept the «free practice of religion» anywhere other than in a religious building or at home.

I think that many of them at one point believed in Jesus alone for eternal life, but over time, have come to accept the lies of religion that they need to have the performance and good works in order to keep or prove their eternal life.

«Theology of religions» is the generally accepted term for how we as Christians articulate our faith in the light of the religious plurality of the world.

After 3 months of searching the internet and you tube to decide if I wanted to come back to religion, I finally found someone who preaches from the heart, the way my Mama and Papa used to hear when they went to church, DR John Collins with the Church of Biblical Christians tells it the way it should be plus he does not accept donations, He preaches against todays prosperity preachers, My Papa said hes the only guy he has heard of lately not affraid to tell you what he thinks and use scripture to back him up.

Islam, with its simplicity of faith and clarity of doctrine, made a tremendous impression on the Hindu mind, and within the first twenty - five years many of the people, including the King of Malabar, had accepted the new religion.

There have been plenty of wars fought over a wide range of reasons, not all wars are over religion, when are you athiests going to get off of your high horse and accept the fact that everyone, religious and non religious cause violence at some time.