Sentences with phrase «accept the science more»

Curiously about 70 % of people want more renewable energy despite this, which shows they might actually accept the science more than they admit in that particular poll.

However please note that Pew Research shows while liberals do accept the science more than conservatives its something like a 60 / 40 split, so not as hugely tribal as you are making out.

Not exact matches

On Monday, as Irma weakened over Georgia, Bossert used a White House briefing to offer more hints of an emerging climate resilience policy, while notably avoiding accepting climate change science: «What President Trump is committed to is making sure that federal dollars aren't used to rebuild things that will be in harm's way later or that won't be hardened against the future predictable floods that we see.

It appears that science has benefited you more than you appreciate and I might be more willing to accept its arguments.

It is indeed to be considered «free thinking» to always curiously trying to understand the origins of life and the universe through science rather than just accepting a 2,000 year old (or more) fairy tale.

I find it baffling that anyone would claim it's good news for the faithful that science has more evidence for what science already accepted as fact for so long.

(Maybe not... based on your ramblings I guess I should not take that for granted) But for some reason you have chosen to accept the revelation of science only up to a specific point in history and then no more.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

Maybe then you'll understand why dropping supersti - tion and accepting the evidence of science is more beneficial to humanity?

As usually presented, then, even by its more sophisticated spokesmen, classical theism requires acceptance of statements about the world, about its origin or end or the happenings within it, which men today are willing to accept, if at all, only with the backing and warrants of science or history.

I have tried, fortified by the most generally accepted and solid conclusions of science, to take the reader above this scene of turmoil; and as we have risen higher so has the prospect acquired a more ordered shape.

AE, I personally know more religious people that accept science than ones that don't.

If it is such a «scientifically incorrect» theory then why don't you publish something in a science journal about it and try to sway the more than 99 % of scientists who accept it as true.

Those who know more about climate science, for example, are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know less on the subject.

For Republicans, the more knowledge they have about climate science the less likely they are to accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming (whereas Democrats» confidence goes up).

«People with more knowledge only accept science when it doesn't conflict with their preexisting beliefs and values,» Landrum explained.

It is an accepted fact, to the point of cliché, that the United States needs more science majors to someday work at all those surplus science jobs.

Until we are willing to accept the world the way it is, without miracles that all empirical evidence argues against, without myths that distort our comprehension of nature, we are unlikely to bridge the divide between science and culture and, more important, we are unlikely to be fully ready to address the urgent technical challenges facing humanity.

The relationship between warmer air and the greater amounts of moisture it contains is one of the most well - accepted tenets of climate science, and underpins one of the more solid projections, that warming will lead to more heavy downpours in general across the globe.

We were honoured to send Iveta Simera to the Council of Science Editors (CSE) Annual Meeting, to accept the CSE's 2017 Award for Meritorious Achievement on behalf of the... Read More

Her chance of being accepted seems even more certain when her high school science teacher encourages her to take on an extracurricular project in pursuit of a scholarship at the prestigious institution.

Toshiba America Foundation accepts applications from teachers who are passionate about making science and mathematics more engaging for their students.

Strong technical skills, particularly in integrating technology in the classroom to drive academic achievement Demonstrated volunteer or community service At least one (or more) of the following: o National Board Certificationo TAP Experience (sign on bonus for TAP certification) o Core Knowledge Experienceo Experience with Blended Learningo At least two years of successful teaching in an urban environment ESSENTIAL POSITION FUNCTIONS: An Elementary School teacher is required to perform the following duties: Plan and implement a blended learning environment, providing direct and indirect instruction in the areas of Social Studies, Science, Language Arts, Health, and Mathematics based on state standards Participation in all TAP requirements, focusing on data - driven instruction Create inviting, innovative and engaging learning environment that develops student critical thinking and problem solving skills Prepare students for strong academic achievement and passing of all required assessments Communicate regularly with parents Continually assess student progress toward mastery of standards and keep students and parents well informed of student progress by collecting and tracking data, providing daily feedback, weekly assessments, and occasional parent / teacher conferences Work with the Special Education teachers and administration to serve special needs students in the classroom Attend all grade level and staff meetings and attend designated school functions outside of school hours Establish and enforce rules for behavior and procedures for maintaining order among the students for whom you are responsible Accept and incorporate feedback and coaching from administrative staff Perform necessary duties including but not limited to morning, lunch, dismissal, and after - school duties Preforms other duties, as deemed appropriate, by the principal Dress professionally and uphold all school policies

The Toshiba America Foundation is accepting applications from middle - and high - school teachers who are passionate about making science and mathematics more engaging for their students.

I would feel much more comfortable on this point if he accepted the Russ Roberts Science challenge and have a section discussing the process by which he arrived at the process by which he arrived at his conclusions.

So while the science has not supported the idea of accepting dogs as hypoallergenic, the market will more than likely continue to make the claim.

Ultimately we all have to accept that scientific endeavors exist because we don't know the final and complete answers to all questions; that is why more research is conducted and science as a human undertaking is not finished.

Polls by Pew Research show the vast majority of people (70 — 80 %) in most countries accept climate science and want more to be done to reduce emissions.

I would be delighted if more Republicans accepted mainstream climate science and took the climate crisis seriously, but it appears that is no longer acceptable behavior within the GOP.

This tribal theory applies to peoples political affiliations such as liberal or conservative, or membership of other social groups, and we know liberals do tend to accept climate science more than conservatives from polls by Pew Research etc, although its not black and white.

A responsible skeptic will request that you remain open minded to opinions from both sides, and consider the uncertainties involved * without * prejudging them based on the demonstrable human predilection toward a «herd mentality» — by «herd mentality», I mean that once a consensus is formed, a flock of «me too» science papers become much more easily accepted, by peer review journals, than the skeptics» papers.

I accept that Gavin et al. will teach me a whole helluva lot more about climate science than I will ever teach him about anything — unless I want to set up a website about radiation physics and he for some reason wants to know something about it.

I will accept your criticism on my comment «climate science is perched on a statistical argument and nothing more.»

It's all the more reason for people to be true skeptics, and to willingly and eagerly accept the burden of really, truly learning and understanding the science.

But I don't believe they agree on the issue to push some agenda, or be in some tribe, its more that for some reason left wingers are more accepting of science in general, although not unthinkingly so.

• Pres ointroduces the paper ooutlines the content • - massive clapping by Venezuela on the table, but are not given the right to speak • Tuvalu oI am grateful that you came back to the meeting owithin the UN, we are given respect as nations owe have processes to consider items collectively otoday I saw leaders saying they had a deal othis is disrespectful of the other countries owe have democratic processes owe appreciate that you have given us more time othis documents have major problems owe need science - based results oanything above 1,5 can mean the end for oresponse measures — inconsistant with Bali oreference to mechanism on REDD - but is not defined clearly ono reference to International Insurance Mechanism oreview mechanism in 2015 is too late oin biblical terms: oI regret to inform you: Tuvalu can not accept that document • Venezuela (bleeding hands from her clapping!)

Indeed, throughout the Science Bulletin paper on Why models run hot, it is self - evident not only that I and my co-authors, including Dr Soon, accept that our returning some CO2 to the atmosphere from which it originally came will cause some global warming, but also that we are thoroughly familiar with the scientific reasons why — all other things being equal — more CO2 in the atmosphere will cause some warming.

So this is not really the «debate» that the contrarians would like to make it out to be, and most scientists, as well as people who have accepted that climate science points to the need for stronger action, have no more interest in letting the Heartland and NIPCC folks hijack the public discourse and getting the media to frame the narrative in their terms.

As we documented in our paper, research has also shown that when people are aware of the expert consensus on human - caused global warming, they're more likely to accept the science and support climate policy to address the problem.

These allegations were reported gleefully in the Boston Globe, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Nature, Scientific American, and many other media outlets and news pages of science journals in a manner calculated not only to divert attention from the conclusions of our paper but also to damage Dr Soon's reputation in his scientific calling, to put his employment at the Center at risk, to deter more serious journals from accepting future papers bearing his name as an author, to deter potential funders for fear of adverse publicity, and thus to threaten not only his livelihood but also the science he loves.

Other research has shown that if people are told about the expert consensus, they're also more likely to accept the science.

The scientific (i.e. «apolitical») approach to criticising the idea of sustainability can only go so far, and almost has to accept that, if the «science» relating to some claim about an unsustainable activity is right, then the sustainable agenda more broadly is right.

Climate science Do you accept the views of climate scientists Read more about Questionnaire for council candidates -LSB-...]

It is not «opposing established authority», it is informing them with science that they don't know, and they accepted that he knew more than they did.

I came to the debate having a bachelor degree in science, and not knowing more, I just accepted that the greenhouse effect was obvious.

Soon and Baliunas just showed there was a mountain of evidence for the medieval warm period and other natural climate variability in history — a very good paper that is now accepted by climate science as more indicative of what actually occured in climate history.....

Many peer - reviewed results later turn out to be incorrect - science does not follow a straight path to some mythical «truth» - but for the most part, papers which are peer reviewed are much more likely to be reporting work carried out in accordance with accepted scientific practice.

The standard view that knowing more science, or being better at mathematical reasoning, ought to make you more accepting of mainstream climate science simply crashed and burned.

John A, say's of me «Such a shame you don't spend any time looking at the evidence to see whether that accepted climate science should have been accepted in the first place» when it's clear I'm here reading stuff I disagree with and discussing it... Then, after more baseless accusation of me unsupported by any evidence bar extrapolation from the details of myself I gave, he goes on to say «I reserve the right to say what I think and justify what I say with evidence that people can check for themselves».

Alarmists accept far more science, it's skeptics by and large who seek to shutdown funding for climate science and deny things like the surface records and the use of climate models.