Sentences with phrase «accept the theory of»

That is why some people of religious faith do not accept the theory of evolution.

Evolution and Creation Dear Fr Editor, Evangelical Creationists, I believe, can not accept the theory of evolution because it appears to conflict with Genesis 1.

We concede that not all who doubt the existence of a personal God do so because they accept the theory of evolution, whether the word be restricted to biology or enlarged to its cosmic significance, but we do say, and from experience know, that most modern agnosticism is bound up with those non-theistic philosophies of evolution that stream off from Hegel as their modern fountain - head.

Many of your brethren have minds which accept the theory of God while they spiritually fail to realize the presence of God.

They accepted the theories of the experts, and looked forward to the prosperity that would fulfill their expectations.

Evolution is the accepted theory of «our» start.

The present most widely accepted theory of the origin of the universe — that of the hot big bang — claims that most of the helium is the product of the big bang itself and occurred within the very first minute of the existence of the expanding universe, and that the background radiation which is now being studied so intensively provides some evidence of the date of this initial explosion.

One of the subtleties of the question of continuity is that, even if one accepts the theory of discrete actualities, the limitations of our powers of introspection (which is really, as Ryle says and Whitehead implies, a form of memory) prevent us from clearly identifying definite intuitions of or by single experiences.

One of the more widely accepted theories of general television effect used in research today is the cultivation analysis theory.

During the fifties he accepted a theory of the moral equivalence of the United States and the Soviet Union.

For Republicans, the more knowledge they have about climate science the less likely they are to accept the theory of anthropogenic global warming (whereas Democrats» confidence goes up).

Now, a team of researchers has announced that temperature fluctuations in the glow clash with one well - accepted theory of how the universe formed.

And in the God - fearing US, just 48 per cent accepted the theory of evolution.

There are polls showing that half the U.S. population accepts the theory of evolution.

The most widely accepted theory of the origin of the Moon speculates that a giant object smashed into the proto - Earth at just enough velocity that part of both bodies broke off and formed the moon.

About three years ago they and another research team working independently at Princeton found a serious flaw in what has been the most widely accepted theory of galactic magnetic fields — a theory that with slight variations has also been used to explain the magnetic fields of individual stars such as the sun.

The phenomenon also surprisingly allows a greater fraction of the protons than neutrons to have high momentum in these relatively neutron - rich nuclei, which is contrary to long - accepted theories of the nucleus and has implications for ultra-cold atomic gas systems and neutron stars.

This is in line with the predictions of the Standard Model, the currently accepted theory of matter.

The most widely accepted theory of the beginning of the universe itself is called the Big Bang Theory.

Again, many empirical observations could prove useful to teachers — for example, that intelligence can be improved with sustained cognitive work — but there is no single accepted theory of intelligence.

Adults» generalscience knowledge hasn't improved since the 1990s — most have never heard of nanotechnology, and fewerthan half understand or accept the theory of evolution, according to research published by the NationalScience Foundation.

Now Vanessa Rodriguez, a former classroom teacher herself, challenges widely accepted theories of teaching and offers a unique idea based on a simple yet empowering truth: we are all teachers.

I've spoken with investors who have accepted the theory of index investing for months, even years, but have never taken action.

But I found that while, on the surface, famous fund managers appear to accept the theories of Buffett and Munger and show great respect for their performance, they are in actual practice the exact opposite because their clients are also the exact opposite to Buffett and Munger.

In the words of climate skeptic Eric Worral, ``... if we reject the principle of Occam's Razor, we open the door to accepting theories of arbitrary, ultimately infinite complexity.

To give an example, a political science professor that I've communicated with believes that a good analogy for climate science and the «Kyoto clique» is what happened in totalitarian communist Russia when they accepted the theory of «Lysenkoism».

About 40 years after the first edition of The Origin of Continents and Oceans was published, the first evidence of rock magnetism and sea floor spreading emerged, and a new generation of geologists, who had grown up outside of the old debates, began to accept the theory of continental drift.

AGW [actually, the AGW / CO2 / global warming hypothesis] challenges the accepted theory of natural climate variability.

Some articles mentioned the possibility of a CO2 greenhouse effect, but they only listed it along with more widely accepted theories of climate change — erratic volcanoes, solar variations, and so forth.

And not only did the «present position of meteorology» reject your CO2 hypothesis, it confirmed that the accepted theory of the cause of climatic change was solar variability.

If the observed GMTA are closer to the IPCC projection, we accept the theory of man made global warming.

I accept the theory of CO2 forcing in full, because the theory itself shows that any damage done is already done, and any additional CO2 is INSIGNIFICANT in that context for CENTURIES.

It's all as it was in those happy carefree days of 2009 and before, BC (yes, Before Cli **** ga **) as we call it now, when the MSM would happily «highlight the most alarmist aspects and downplay any mention of uncertainty» (Zorita), when no doubts were allowed, or should I say expressed, about the holy trilogy of WG1, 2, and 3 — how certain it was that the well - accepted theory of ghg effect, and the impacts thereof, would lead to a Copenhagen / Kyoto utopia of global cooperation, and that the IPCC was cool (whoops, «the request for more research about the social dynamics of the IPCC, of positive feedbacks as described by Judith, is meaningful for me» (von Storch).)

Publicly, insurers have not accepted the theory of global warming, which says that the accumulation of greenhouse gases - in part because of activities like burning fossil fuels - is changing weather patterns.

According to the well - accepted theory of «issue attention cycles», public attention to an issue goes through a cycle involving five steps.

But it's worth noting though that Grove herself accepted the theory of the greenhouse effect, and the mounting evidence confirming its impact on C20th climate.

Not exact matches

That is, we all accept, in theory, that no one lives forever, while avoiding thinking about the prospect of our own deaths.

Russian officials failed to understand the State Theory of money that is the basis of Modern Monetary Theory: States can create their own money, giving it value by accepting it in payment of taxes.

Peoples» attention has been distracted into speculation about of how they might get rich in a parallel universe that might exist in theory — if one accepts the narrow - minded assumptions that are being taught — but whose most important real - world consequence is to impose a debt spiral on America and other nations.

Search theories locate the cause of wage nominal stickiness in workers» decisions about what wage offers to accept.

``... it's deeply disappointing that the members opposite continue to peddle dangerous conspiracy theories instead of accepting the simple fact that this is about protecting kids,» said Calgary - Hawkwood NDP MLA Michael Connolly in response to Ellis» proposed amendment.

One who accepts or assumes the theory of behaviorism (behavioral finance in investing.)

If ID were presented as a scientific theory and as such had scientific evidence, then I have no choice to be to accept it (regardless of my beliefs, again).

Real things take nowhere that long to circulate and be accepted - Newton's theory of gravity probably took around 50 years (if that) and nowadays it can take just a few weeks / months for newly discovered facts to get around.

You accept only your view and theory but when someone with a different view comes along then all of a sudden you are not as accepting!

The theory of evolution is also embraced by many who claim to accept the Bible as the word of God.

Either you accept it as the theory which best explains the every - growing mountain of data across all scientific disciplines for the origins of our species or you do not.

Tom tom: I'm sure you accept many things without absolute proof - for example, you probably accept that matter is made of atoms which you can not see; you probably accept that gravity is not going to disappear tomorrow; you probably believe that testing a theory over and over will yield reliable results.

He has shown a lack of reasoning in this regard, following along the lines that accepting creation means that basically a person is «stupid» and that educated people believe in this theory.

You do of course realize that it is reasonable to believe in God and accept the big bang theory, evolution and a 4.5 billion year old earth?