Not exact matches
In an August 11, 2016 announcement, the DEA reconfirmed its position, «marijuana remains a schedule I controlled substance
because it does not meet the criteria for currently
accepted medical use in
treatment in the United States, there is a lack of
accepted safety for its use under medical supervision, and it has a high potential for abuse.»
More fundamentally, how is it acceptable to tell religious minorities that things are comparatively good for them
because they can «choose» to
accept oppressive and demeaning
treatment and manage to survive?
How is it acceptable to tell religious minorities that things are comparatively good for them
because they can «choose» to
accept oppressive and demeaning
treatment and manage to survive?
Lewis I think you prosecute your argument well and powerfully, that complaining about unfair
treatment because of who you happen to be fits oddly with
accepting the privileges and duties of hereditary monarchy.
This is also the point that public health authorities, physicians and nutritionists almost religiously refuse to
accept or even understand,
because one implication of what I'm saying is that the good Dr. Atkins was right all along, and they just can't get it through their head, as Oz can't, that a diet of the kind Atkins recommended might be not only healthy but the medically appropriate
treatment for the condition — in this case, obesity.
Because lawyers are committed to equal
treatment under the law, they generally strive to cabin their legal arguments in logos — deductive and inductive reasoning, grounded in generally
accepted premises.
The EAT
accepted that it would be easier for employers if the interpretation of s 2 (2) were a strict one, permitting any more favourable
treatment, but held that this was not acceptable
because of the effects on others» rights.
If you have a history of not turning up to appointments with doctors or you have rejected
treatment in the past, you are less likely to be
accepted because you aren't showing a proactive approach and being preventative.
We report on the development of the evidence base by examining the ACE survey scores in relationship to the established clinical measures of clinical severity, global function, and problem severity collected routinely for children and adolescents referred and
accepted for
treatment.29, 30 Systemwide implementation of the ACE survey, as a first step, positions CAAMHPP to become an evidence - based, trauma - informed service organization,
because ACE survey scores necessarily must relate to clinical outcomes in order to evaluate the effect of trauma - focused interventions in clinical practice.
I believe this is
because it is designed to be a supportive method of
treatment wherein both partners feel heard, loved and
accepted.