Sentences with phrase «accept the truth which»

2 Thessalonians 2:7 - 12 speaks of the end times in which there will be those who refuse to love and accept the truth which will save them.

Not exact matches

After all, truth aims at understanding, which comes about only when the truth is freely accepted by the reason.

They accepted it as the system of truth by which other things could be judged.

A prolepsis, as he uses the notion, is simply a claim staked out in history, which, when and if history is fulfilled, will be verified or falsified, and which is of such a nature that those who in the meantime have accepted it will all along have been living appropriately to the truth that will at the end be discovered.

«Besides, Christians have answered this exact post numerous times for which you non-believers never accept Jesus» truth on it.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

«he had to accept the truth of her accusation» synonyms: veracity, truthfulness, verity, sincerity, candor, honesty; More accuracy, correctness, validity, factuality, authenticity «he doubted the truth of her statement» antonyms: dishonesty, falseness • that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality.

«The degree to which you will awaken will be in direct proportion to the amount of truth you can accept about yourself.»

It is the sad truth that wars have raged intermittently in Christendom and that the present conflict, the worst yet, has broken out in Europe, which has been under Christian influence for at least a millennium and a half; but the Christian faith has never accepted this situation or failed to deplore it.

But I think there is some risk that it might be misconstrued so as to obscure certain truths which I believe to be fundamental: that the Passion is the moment at which that complete oneness with the Father which is the unique and all - pervading characteristic of the life of Jesus is paradoxically manifested; that it is at that moment, above all, that Jesus discloses to us God himself in action; that the judgement passed on Jesus and the testing brought to bear upon him are a judgement and a testing exercised (of course, within the permissive will of God) by evil men, or, to use mythological language, by the devil; and that the judgement of God pronounced at Calvary is that which Christ's accepting love passes upon those men, and upon ourselves as sharers in their sinfulness, by showing up their sin in all its hatefulness.

This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So, upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.

The value of faith stems not from the irrationality of its object but from the humility that is required to see the truth which is accepted, and the courage required to act upon it.

If Christian thinkers accept the authority of a natural theology, they are accepting something alien and necessarily opposed to their own truth, which is given them in the Christian community.

'' Once you remove man's dogmas and get back to the teachings of Jesus Christ» Which is one of man's dogmas... Men wrote the bible.You haven't removed anything, you have accepted one of man's dogmas as if it were truth.

That truth - which is mine and which comes wholly from within is not yet simply what I have only accepted in the formal freedom of Yes or No.

I agree with David, and if you think it's not possible, then you're welcome to accept the «truth» as «made up» by the institution which we accept as «gospel».

In the same manner that the Church can not realistically expect the world to accept our teaching on moral and social issues without recognition of our perspective, the world and «lazy Catholics» must eventually realize that there are foundational truths which are immutable to the faith.

Indeed, the truth of the matter can never be fully explained, for like all personal relationships in their depth and in their strange yet wonderful capacity to enrich our living — of human life with God's life, of men and women with each other — there is a mystery here which we must accept with «natural piety» but which we can never hope to explicate with utter clarity.

If he accepts other norms besides this, then he must return to some identification of revealed propositional truth, admit some other encounter with God than that which occurs in Jesus Christ, or allow authority to the conclusions of philosophical speculation.

«23 Pinnock is suggesting that elements of the evangelical community are presently confusing Biblical truth with certain traditional interpretations of the Biblical record which they accept.

By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.

It took a real effort on my part to keep calling myself to the truths of my faith, which says that however he was behaving, in God's eyes he was just as precious as my little girl, and that's a hard thing to accept when you're having to deal with the loss of somebody that's so dear to you.

Jesus used a traditionally accepted form of teaching in a non-traditional way to teach paradigm - shifting and theology - shattering truths which were «too much» for most people to hear, understand, or comprehend.

One needs to work hard to get out of these lies... one should spend time to study the basic principles of the all the books we have around us this time which include the book of Mormon and LDS... then you think what make sense and what not... the accept the true one... I can assure you that there is only one Truth as two can't be truth... you just have to look for it and use ur intellectuaTruth as two can't be truth... you just have to look for it and use ur intellectuatruth... you just have to look for it and use ur intellectuals...

«I come as a pilgrim of truth and hope to this Shrine of St. Lazarus,» he said, «as one who experiences in his own flesh the meaning and value which suffering can have when it is accepted by drawing near in trust to God who is rich in mercy.»

It is a paradox of truth which I accept at this point.

To accept or discover the truth about something is to have acquired a language in which interpreted sentences can be applied in a certain way.

If the bible is not without error, then how do we know which parts to accept as truth and which to reject as fiction?

You are a real azz this is the way the gay agenda went forward you can trace this is one there is a court case associated with it so you may not like it but its truth which I know you cant accept.

It ever seems to be my lot in life to find it necessary to deal with half - truths which have a germ of validity but which accepted in their distorted form constitute a heresy — which is exactly what I think we are dealing with in the «church growth movement.»

In modern society we tend to accept truth only if it bears on reality — specifically scientific reality — which has become our ultimate truth.»

Some seem to take the liberties of creating convenient truths to justify their failure in accepting factual knowledge in the interest of arguments, which is ludicrous violating all the teachings of the faith, which is all inclusive.

But he is himself inclined to reject personal immortality on the ground that to wish for it is to indulge in a kind of selfishness which refuses to accept and rejoice in any accomplishment of goodness or truth or beauty unless «I» can have a personal share in its triumph.

You act as if the Holy Spirit automatically, simultaneously, interprets a wide variety of truth, which is then either accepted or rejected by pastors and laypeople based on — what the Bible says.

The Anglican philosopher - bishop Joseph Butler extended this theory to explain why some men accepted evidence which pointed to the truth of Christianity and others did not.

Isn't «orthodoxy» the only path the Christian can walk if he or she has read, understands, and accepts as truth, the book in which he or she basis their faith on?

Here we are urged to make a simple accommodation to the demands of what certainly we may call the unthinking members of our generation; we have an eager willingness to accept without question what appears to be their desire for an authoritative totalitarian system which has no respect for truth; we have, in fact, a shocking submission to the worst aspects of the modern mind.

... from the Catholic viewpoint, anti-Semitism, if it spreads among those calling themselves disciples of Jesus Christ, seems to be a pathological phenomenon which indicates the deterioration of Christian conscience when it becomes incapable of accepting its own historic responsibilities and of remaining existentially faithful to the high exigencies of Christian truth.

Anyways, I appreciate what I see on these pages, which seems to be serious discussion of difficult topics, and a desire on the part of many individuals to find truth and God, rather then just accept or reject automatically the views of an individual, or even of themselves.

Alexis, If you seriously think that, apart from the occasional exception, Arsenal are either motivated by Wenger or self motivated, then you have been ignoring not only the legendary soft underbelly we have had for about the last decade, which is universal accepted as the awful truth throughout the Prem world, by our ex-players, other top ex player pundits and virtually all our own fans too.

Your full of perspective post, which many «one eyed» fans have chosen to dislike for reasons of not wishing to accept the truth, perfectly illustrates the fact — which I have also been saying on social media for years past — that these days, players are very rarely actual FANS of the club they play for and who pay their grotesque wages.

I love this writeup... Its the bitter truth which we Arsenal fans must accept... Walcott is loyal and brave in front of goals... he would have scored more goals if not for injuries... He always scores against big teams... let's give him the credit he deserves for God sake.

Though Wenger refuses, utterly, to accept this truth - which is a PRIME reason he must go, and I believe will go in May, at latest — I believe that a new manager next season will insist on whole hearted players ONLY in our team.

The honest truth is that the German has one year left on his contract, which is reported to be around # 100,000 - a-week, and we all know he is not going to accept a move to another club unless he is paid an equivalent sum, which simply is NOT going to happen in his wildest dreams.

I now see the relevance of Luke 4: 24 which says: «But I tell you the truth, no prophet is accepted in his own hometown» he bemoaned.

Famously, Locke discredited innate ideas by arguing that logical and mathematical truths, which make the best candidates for innate ideas, are by no means universally accepted.

According to him, Fadi had relied on stories already publicized by «none existing and fake» media organizations which he noted were disaster and cautioned people to be very careful what they read and accept as truth.

The Tories would say that our much - repeated line that the NHS is «not safe in their hands» became an accepted truth after the Labour spin - machine kept on repeating it (there is a «grid» where party political machines try to control the daily news agenda, which naturally can have the effect of making broadcasters want to talk about anything but the parties» news agenda).

In the introduction of the book, which ScienceInsider has reviewed, de Mattei criticizes scientists for failing to accept that the theory of evolution isn't supported by evidence and for ideologically denying any metaphysical truth, starting with the existence of a God that created the Universe.

Grades gauge «truth in advertising» by indicating the degree to which states inform parents of how well their students are doing on an internationally accepted scale.