Sentences with phrase «accept their statements as»

Otherwise, you adopt the same kind of mindset they do when they expect people to just accept their statements as facts, yet they provide no evidence to support them...

For years, I accepted this statement as fact.

That film is like painting — context can certainly enhance a certain line of thinking, but the job of gleaning pleasure comes from imaginative flights of fancy more than blindly accepting statements as fact.

[IPCC is the «expert» on anthropogenic greenhouse warming, so let's accept this statement as correct.]

After some discussion, Saudi Arabia agreed to accept the statement as presented.

Not exact matches

«Over the past several months, Cambridge Analytica has been the subject of numerous unfounded accusations and, despite the company's efforts to correct the record, has been vilified for activities that are not only legal, but also widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising in both the political and commercial arenas,» the company said in the statement.

As mentioned above, financial statements are produced by companies for the benefit of shareholders, and are prepared in accordance to sets of accounting rules (i.e. International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, in Canada, and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, in the U.S.) These rules differ greatly from those used to calculate corporate income taxes owing.

In a statement, Cambridge Analytica says it has been «vilified» for actions it says are both legal and widely accepted as part of online advertising.

The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of Goldman Sachs» financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)(United States) and expressing an opinion as to the conformity of Goldman Sachs» financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting.

These integrated audits serve as a basis for the auditors» opinions included in the annual report to stockholders addressing whether the financial statements fairly present the Company's financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and whether the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.

«Over the past several months, Cambridge Analytica has been the subject of numerous unfounded accusations and, despite the Company's efforts to correct the record, has been vilified for activities that are not only legal, but also widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising in both the political and commercial arenas,» the firm said in a statement.

The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the annual financial statements prepared by management and expressing an opinion as to whether those financial statements conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The statement goes on to label the public vilification it has faced since a joint Guardian and Channel 4 exposé in March as based on «unfounded accusations,» claiming their activities are not only legal but also «widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising.»

Many places in Charlotte do not accept bank statements as proof of income.

«Over the past several months, Cambridge Analytica has been the subject of numerous unfounded accusations and, despite the Company's efforts to correct the record, has been vilified for activities that are not only legal, but also widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising in both the political and commercial arenas,» the statement reads.

These audits serve as a basis for the auditors» opinions included in the annual report to stockholders addressing whether the financial statements fairly present our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and whether our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.

• The Prohibited Transaction 84 - 24: The rule adds Impartial Conduct Standards to PTE 84 - 24, which include acting as a fiduciary, accept only «reasonable» compensation, and make no materially misleading statements.

One can literally find hundreds of such statements online by dozens of different analysts in recent years that falsely equate gold as a dead asset, that are in turn, literally accepted and parroted by thousands, if not millions, of other people without any further confirming research.

American Bridge spokesperson Andrew Bates released the following statement after Larry Kudlow accepted Donald Trump's offer to succeed Gary Cohn as director of the National Economic Council:

«Over the past several months, Cambridge Analytica has been the subject of numerous unfounded accusations and, despite the Company's efforts to correct the record, has been vilified for activities that are not only legal, but also widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising in both the political and commercial arenas,» the company said in a statement Wednesday.

For example, in the latter days of the 2011 election campaign, as Jack Layton's orange wave was gathering momentum, Harper and then - Finance Minister Jim Flaherty jumped all over Mr. Layton for allegedly violating the sacrosanct principle of central bank independence. Layton had responded to a reporter's question about interest rates, indicating it would be better for Canada's economy if they stayed low. Harper and Flaherty denounced this statement violently, calling it a «rookie mistake» that threatened the independence of the Bank. Layton quickly issued a clarification confirming that he, too, accepted the doctrine of central bank independence.

It requires advisors and agents to act as fiduciaries, make no misleading statements and accept only «reasonable» compensation.

Those standards require annuity sellers into retirement accounts to act as a fiduciary, make no misleading statements and accept only «reasonable» compensation.

You probably believe your own statement simply because it fits in with your beliefs, accepting it as true as a matter of faith alone without proof.

What dismays me about Miley Cyrus is the same thing that dismays me about the current trend of instantly going to the allowable limit (and a bit over) in dress and act: I get the feeling she feels like she's proving something; that this is not an artistic statement of anything but rather, that she feels like she needs to do this to be accepted as a female singer and entertainer.

belief: 1: acceptance by the mind that something is true or real, often underpinned by an emotional or spiritual sense of certainty 2: confidence that somebody or something is good or will be effective 3: something that somebody believes in: a statement, principle, or doctrine that a person or group accepts as true

Its like you arent supposed to peep behind the curtain but just accept the phrase as some kind of deep mystical statement, full of meaning... oooh, he died for our sins you know... did he?

As a reader trying to be charitable, I face an unattractive choice: accept that His Eminence does hold the mistaken view that mercy is essential to God; or assume that when he emphatically made the multiple important statements at key points in his book that mercy is essential to God, he didn't mean them.

All business people who wish to advertise must sign a statement that they have «accepted Jesus Christ as personal Lord and Saviour.»

If I accept your statement I would have to lie and look at 2000 years of misogyny, hatred, ignorance and destruction as «the devil»..

Look around now, I can guarantee that any «ridicule» you're feeling is only in reaction to christian policy and statements, and sure I lump all of them together because the main point of EVERY christian sect is to get me to accept jesus as my savior and to follow the new testement, only after that does it become more nuanced.

Some basic statement like, «Accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and savior and you will be saved from your sins» is meaningless in any real sense unless the preacher says something about what he means by Jesus Christ.

Or, perhaps what you accepted as evidence was simply statements by others of the existence of evidence.

Unable to accept the creed literally, I nevertheless recited it as a statement of my heritage and found myself deeply moved — often to tears — in a way that I had never experienced in evangelical churches.

As Collins and Miller illustrate, there are those who accept a divine supernatural realm and methodological naturalism (as opposed to metaphysical naturalism); but because religion is introduced long before science education, your «brainwashing... only ways» statement and your subsequent tu quoque are both faultAs Collins and Miller illustrate, there are those who accept a divine supernatural realm and methodological naturalism (as opposed to metaphysical naturalism); but because religion is introduced long before science education, your «brainwashing... only ways» statement and your subsequent tu quoque are both faultas opposed to metaphysical naturalism); but because religion is introduced long before science education, your «brainwashing... only ways» statement and your subsequent tu quoque are both faulty.

There will usually be enough overlap between the assumptions of the two parties that a common core of observations - statements can be accepted by both — even, I would argue, in a change as far - reaching as that from classical physics to relativity.

Sadly, you offer no proof of your statement and expect it to be accepted as fact.

The Anglican — Roman Catholic Consultation in the U.S. has just published a statement on «Ecclesiology and Moral Discernment» that urges Episcopalians and Roman Catholics to enter «into each other's struggles, accepting them as our own, that we may bear witness to our unity in Christ.»

Everybody wants to do what is right in their own eyes and frankly, I am growing weary of media statements that suggest «well, everybody knows that the Bible is just a book of myths and that it's irrelevant, etc.» as though everyone accepts this as understood.

In all cases, however, to accept such statements as true is to challenge the full autonomy of science and history within their own proper spheres; and it is this challenge to a genuinely secular outlook, rather than any particular statement in itself, which makes classical theism so widely unacceptable to contemporary men.

As usually presented, then, even by its more sophisticated spokesmen, classical theism requires acceptance of statements about the world, about its origin or end or the happenings within it, which men today are willing to accept, if at all, only with the backing and warrants of science or history.

If we substitute «Jesus Christ» for «neighbor» Christians in general will accept that statement; but there is danger in that substitution as well as the possibility of enlightenment, since the relation of Jesus Christ to our other neighbors is often obscured in theology; his revelation of what it means to be a man is often forgotten in favor of exclusive attention to his disclosure of what it means that God is, and is Good.

We confess the Triune God affirmed in the Nicene and Apostles» creeds, which we accept as brief, faithful statements of Christian doctrine based upon Scripture.

An inseparable part of the ecumenical task is to move the churches toward visible unity in, as the New Delhi statement put it (I abbreviate), «one baptism, one gospel, breaking the one bread, joining in common prayer, a corporate life reaching out in witness and service to all, a ministry and membership accepted by all, and the ability to act and speak together as occasion requires.»

Yet, a person must ultimately accept some creedal statements and reject others, as they create their own philosophical journey.

If they are assured of salvation through an invisible church, why must they accept the statement that the function of the church is to «identify» the power that saves them as the power of Christ?

Your statement reminds me of a satirical remark by Steven Colbert: «And though I am a committed Christian, I believe that everyone has the right to their own religion — be you Hindu, Jewish, or Muslim, I believe there are infinite paths to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior.»

With something so broadly accepted in Christianity as «vision», one really does need to be very provocative to get people to think about it ---- otherwise they just do their usual «pass over» of the issue and assume that a vision statement is what everyone should have because, well, that's how it's always been done.

The following statement is outright false, «One the one hand, you do not accept the Bible as authority, and yet, on the other hand, you assume that taking it as an authority means taking each piece as literally true.»

The linguistic and biblicist vetos have been seen to be both arbitrary and unwarranted — which makes it all the more pathetic that Dr Paul van Buren in The Secular Meaning of the Gospel still seems to accept them as valid and to rule out «God - statements» as «meaningless» while at the same time his excessive Barthian christocentrism and bibliocentrism turns the patent intention of scriptural statement into a parody of their proper meaning.