Sentences with phrase «accept them as being true»

The basic idea is that a claim is accepted as being true simply because most people are favorably inclined towards the claim.

Not exact matches

«That much may indeed be true, but it was one of many of the tall tales that further evolved into a truism of sorts, that was basically «accepted» as such by historians, press and mafia history aficionados,» Cipollini said.

Under the pleadings standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, which if accepted as true, states a «claim to relief that is plausible on its face.»

Unfortunately, many of us have already been conditioned to accept these proclamations as fact without even conducting any independent research on our own to (1) determine if the authoritative figure is even an authority on the topic, which in many cases, he or she is not; and (2) determine if what the authoritative figure is stating is actually true or not.

The problem is that instead of accepting reality understanding your true self you have to believe in a deity to keep that feeling of being special alive as an adult.

A Muslim community that feels accepted as true Americans and is encouraged to enter the mainstream will be the best OFFENSE FOR homegrown terrorism.

This is why you write this nonsense that you have been misled into accepting as true, when infact it is a lie.

This is because a belief is the acceptance of something as true, and to accept something, you first need to be convinced of it, which can be either good or bad reasons in and of themselves.

Blacks alongside gays, alongside Hispanics, alongside the poor and the middleclass??? Shouldn't we all band together in a common cause - to be recognized and accepted, for equal rights for all members of our society??? Shouldn't the 99 % be the voice of this country - as opposed to the oppressive 1 %??? I think we should all band together - pushing for a common cause, and making America the true beacon of what a Modern society looks like!

What it really means is that for each of the countless false hypotheses that are contemplated by researchers, we accept a 5 percent chance that it will be falsely counted as true — a decision with a considerably more deleterious effect on the proportion of correct studies.

preacherlady: you are a wise woman trey: listen to what she says & stop trying to get everyone to accept you Reality check 1: not everyone has to like or love you for you to be happy Reality check 2: as long as it is true for me I am going to say what I believe so I am going to have to let the rest of you do that too, even if I think you are wrong Questions: what part of «love one another» don't you guys understand?

On the other hand, belief is simply belief — accepting something as true without an explanation based in fact.

belief: 1: acceptance by the mind that something is true or real, often underpinned by an emotional or spiritual sense of certainty 2: confidence that somebody or something is good or will be effective 3: something that somebody believes in: a statement, principle, or doctrine that a person or group accepts as true

This means you have a concept «God» and that you accept it as being «true».

This is not something that all people can do, as some people can not accept things without the verification that the thing is true, and if there were proof, then it isn't faith.»

The flaw with your belief isn't that I can not prove your god false, it's that you accept him as true without the ability to prove him false.

As long as evangelism is the focus, God will continue to bless it... Shoe box gifts are distributed along with The Greatest Gift of All, an illustrated booklet that gives a clear presentation of the true meaning of Christmas... After the shoe boxes are distributed, we also provide follow - up materials to give children further opportunities to accept Christ and grow in their faitAs long as evangelism is the focus, God will continue to bless it... Shoe box gifts are distributed along with The Greatest Gift of All, an illustrated booklet that gives a clear presentation of the true meaning of Christmas... After the shoe boxes are distributed, we also provide follow - up materials to give children further opportunities to accept Christ and grow in their faitas evangelism is the focus, God will continue to bless it... Shoe box gifts are distributed along with The Greatest Gift of All, an illustrated booklet that gives a clear presentation of the true meaning of Christmas... After the shoe boxes are distributed, we also provide follow - up materials to give children further opportunities to accept Christ and grow in their faith.

Coming to the conclusion that faith is a terrible excuse for accepting something as true is a painstaking journey many of us have experienced.

I am not putting forth a concept of «No God» and accepting it as being «true».

At least those scientific theories we accept as true have physical evidence to support them and / or can be replicated in a lab.

And Atheists views are all over the map when it comes to what they accept as true about those different things.

========= @Colin * continued * ================ with the «Big Bang» therory as to why it couldn't be true, yet for the most part everyone accepts it as a truth.

If Senator Bird was pressed on his early involvement with KKK leaders, why is Romney not pressed on his ongoing dedication to extreme racists like Brigham Young, who he accepts as a true prophet of God?

The problem is that unless you accept the Bible as literally true — a perspective that has NO basis is science or history — your argument is entirely useless.

If its claims are true then that is good evidence for accepting it as the Word of God.

If it is true then it must be accepted as revealed in scripture.

If one accepts those axioms as being true by definition, then the Pythagorean theorem is «true» also, because it necessarily follows directly from those axioms.

How can this be true given the historic mantra of evangelicals to «accept Jesus into your hearts as your personal Savior»?

A person falls prey to this fallacy if he accepts a claim as being true simply because most other people approve of the claim.

You made a claim, but unless you give some basis, e.g. evidence, to think that it is true, no one is obligated to accept it as true.

But if he doesn't accept the neutrality of methodological and philosophic issues, his assumption is even stronger that the Whiteheadian methodology, as well as his own, are the only true ones.

The books of the New Testament were closer in time to the actual event than most histories of that time or earlier that are generally accepted as true.

Medical science is always developing, and what was accepted as true in the past can be disproved in the present.

But it can easily be posited and reasonably accepted as likely true.

We simply need to accept that satisfaction, and live as if it's true.

Christians will always give you the line that «all sins can be forgiven» — this is true — only only the proviso that they repent and accept god as their saviour.

After attending the conference I decided that the obsession with individual rights — the right to make money or to write, say or do what I please — should be exposed for what it is: a form of fundamentalism that accepts one worldview as absolute and rejects all others as encroachments on the true faith.

On the other hand, toleration of beliefs does not require that we accept every idea as equally valid, as if a belief is true, right or good simply because someone expresses it.

If sociologists have tended to center on the foregoing argument and to single out work as the basis of their assessment of our present inability to play authentically, theologians and philosophers have tended to: focus upon a second area: America's distorted value structure that has accepted as true the «mindscape» of technology 48 This is Theodore Roszak's phrase, and his discussion can perhaps serve as a helpful starting point.

Similarly, fundamentalist Protestants, believing in the inerrancy of the Bible as though every word of it, dictated by God himself, was to be accepted as indubitably true, ultimately rely in all their arguments on an external authority.

The administration of the Church's sacraments is equally important, of course, and this is especially true for us if we accept the position of the sixteenth - century Reformers that in the celebration of the sacraments of Baptism and Holy Communion, as well as in the pulpit, the gospel is proclaimed and expressed.

Within schools it is accepted that it may be possible to state as a proposition that the Catholic Church teaches such and such a thing but not to insist that it is objectively true [10].

Muslims who did not accept Wahhabi principles were judged to be not true Muslims and were sometimes even treated as infidels.

Most of us were trained to minister to a culture that had a Christian baseline, but we weren't trained how to reach people who don't accept the Bible as true or know about Christ.

What we mean here is myth in its everyday, nontechnical sense as understood by you and me: a story that is told as if it were literally true, but which is no longer accepted as factual, and which explains or symbolizes a belief or insight.

It is legitimate, of course, to accept the experience of others as a valuable source of suggestions for ideas, but the ideas must be accepted as true only by the test of repeatable experience, and not on the ground that some powerful or eloquent or venerated person has stated them.

Wall off a piece of land and build a room with a thatched roof...» (Malfoozat Vol 2, p. 42) «Jamaat» is a form of jihad (today's word is Terrorism) against all other religions not following Islam or accepting Islam as the only true religion.

A theory is accepted as true when its predictions are tested over and over again and repeatedly confirmed.

The point is to be accepted as one's true self, not what anyone else believes they should be.

Your formula is meant to be simplistic and «powerful», but your understanding of really large numbers is what is actually what is holding you back from accepting evolution as being true.