posits that we lose something when we «see through» Burt's dance with his buddies as smirkingly homosexual; when we don't think of our starlets as fresh off the bus; when we refuse to
accept things at face value.
Nicolas Cage makes the best twins since Jeremy Irons, giving a decidedly non-Cage performance in a picture that wanders around in our collective night, searching for love and the freedom to
accept things at face value.
As adults, it is easy to just
accept things at face value or to know that something works without understanding how.
I guess I am a wolf then... certainly not one of the flock who follows where led... but i commend you on attempting to peal back the layers... We should all be like that... not
accepting things at face value.
Because this is so very easily refutable one can regard such attempts as nothing more than pure propaganda aimed at a believing audience use to
accepting things at face value.
Not exact matches
I have never had a problem
accepting that I am an average coder
at best and there are many
things I am yet to learn... Always be humble and be willing to learn.»
Stoicism is,
at its core,
accepting and anticipating this in advance, so that you don't freak out, react emotionally and aggravate
things further.
One
thing I did initially was that I came in with lower prices and
accepted jobs
at a loss, so for a couple of years I had some pretty significant losses.
They have
accepted that if they want to innovate by doing
things better and more profitably, they will inevitably stumble
at some point.
We humans don't typically agree on all that much, but there is
at least one
thing that an impressive amount of us
accept: which hand is easiest to control.
Some of the most
accepted advice turned out to be the worst
thing for me
at the time.
They'll
accept Lively's claims of being «vilified» and «attacked» without taking a single moment to look
at the heinous and hurtful
things that he says and does.
I unlike you can
accept that there are
things that I can't know the answers to
at this time, and that perhaps someday we will figure it out.
I personally ping - ponged back and forth between religion and non-religion for a long time before
accepting that we humans are truly only guessing
at things, and likely inventing
things, that are impossible to know for sure.
At this point, it's best for all of us to just grow up and
accept that fact that Hollywood is going to make a movie out of every single
thing...
Actually there is historical proof that he was a healer and a miracle worker, but
at that time it was an
accepted profession and there were 1,000's of people that did the same
thing.
Funny how those people still want to reserve THEIR right to rage
at, bully and make jokes of the
things THEY don't want to
accept though.
On the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Web Site, Wayne Grudem warns that if Christians
accept egalitarianism, «we will begin to have whole churches who no longer «tremble»
at the Word of God (Isaiah 66:2), and who no longer live by «every word that comes from the mouth of God» (Matthew 4:4), but who pick and choose the
things they like and the
things they don't like in the Bible.»
xx4zu1 - «the point that was made is that religion is the only
thing that is given to you, in most cases,
at birth that you can chose not to
accept.»
Again, may I repeat that we may not approve of this terrifying free will being given to men
at all, but it is one of those
things which we are bound to
accept.
Such short - term therapy aims not
at deep underlying problems, but
at helping the person do
things that will improve his chances of achieving productive sobriety —
things such as
accepting the fact that he is an alcoholic, learning how to face and handle his fears and resentments constructively, changing his ways of relating so that the guilt - isolation - anger spiral is not triggered so often.
The
thing is though
at that age my parent's didn't push me into just
accepting their faith or else.
I wish people would
accept that the «Bible» is not gods word neither was it wrote by god but by men who put what they decided they wanted as rules for everyone else to run their life based on, every
thing from what type of fabric you can wear
at the same time to what you can eat on certain days.
And regardless of what you believe about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will present you with a new way of looking
at things so that you no longer have to choose between
accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.
At the same time, he's saying we need to respect faith enough to understand that many people will rely solely on that for their views and we should
accept that doing so is not necessarily a bad
thing.
For many Christians to
accept evolution and reject creation hits
at things much deeper than the question of origin.
It often pretends to approve of (or
at least
accept as natural) the very
things the satirist wishes to attack.
Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make
things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or
at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hi
at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (
At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following hi
At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to
accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.
I'm sorry if I went on
at quite a length
at this, but I hope I impressed that this is a serious and deep issue in the understanding of the nature of God, some might not be in any position to
accept it as true, but it is not to be rejected out of hand as a silly or tricky little
thing that people are foolish for falling into believing.
«There are
things in the Jewish tradition that I can not
accept at all,» Buber has said, «and
things I hold true that are not expressed in Judaism.
Moore proposes instead that if we
accept Whitehead's conviction that as creativity operates in living
things it aims
at the enhancement of life, we then will interpret human behavior in terms of the will - to - life.
Churches, by and large don't realize that this is a journey... a process... and expect people to
accept the whole
thing all
at once and in doing so, lose them out the door.
First, «the Torah assumed» nothing
at all — we either
accept that «The Lord spoke to Moses» (Leviticus 6:8) and instructed him in the necessary burnt, grain, sin, restitution and fellowship sacrifices (Leviticus 6 - 7) or we dismiss that God spoke to Moses
at all and believe that Moses made the whole
thing up.
and also if i have and your answer is yes then if there is a way to get the holy spirit back then please tell me and also please pray for me for a few days and i also want to know that really is the unforgivable sin unforgivable and really i swear on my mother that i don't want to go to hell forever and i am very scared of it please help me urgent and also i am sending a friend request to you on facebook and please
accept it so that we can talk on this matter together and also i think you will like my page and i couldn't sleep properly because of this and in my half sleep in my dreams i was just visiting your website and finding my comment missing and i as pleasing god and the holy spirit but as i was receiving my spirit again and again as i mentioned this in my previous comment i was abusing in my mind i couldn't stop abusing and i have a very good mother she tried to wake me but i told her not to do and it was happening same
things again and again and i told my mother again the half truth because i don't want to break her heart and she told me that there is nothing like ghosts and they are making me fools (you all) and i am telling you honestly before this i irritate my mother a lot i just watch tv and surf the internet or play games in my pc and i eat and brush late and also don't listen to my parents but after i saw your website i became obedient for a few days and again the same i am disobedient your webpage or article ruined my life but this is not your fault and now days i am buy searching about this topic and my father (Vivek Saraf) broke his hands on the 6th May while riding
at a very high speed he normally don't go
at a very high speed but he had a very important work so whole he was riding a dog was running on the way and to save his life he gave a very hard brake and he with his nebiour fall down and got injuries in his legs and broke his hands and
at first he walked with difficulty and then the local people helped him on his way and took him to the local hospital but the doctor told that we need to go to Kollkata (the capital of west bengal, India) and so he went with his loyal staff because he is a business man and in the hospital he got cured but he still have the fracture in his hands so i request you to pray for him and his negibour also and i will tell you the rest in facebook bye and sorry for spelling mistakes in my previous comments.
One of the
things I have respected most in Aida Rosa, principal of the elementary school P.S. 30, and the teachers that I talk with on her staff is that they look
at children here as children, not as «distorted children,» not as «morally disabled children,» not as «quasi-children» who require a peculiar arsenal of reconstructive strategies and stick - and - carrot ideologies that wouldn't be
accepted for one hour by the parents or the teachers of the upper middle class.
You see, we atheists have this
thing about requiring proof before blindly
accepting what — on the surface
at least — sound like ridiculous claims.
If it's OK for Buddists, Taoists and some Christians to believe that certain
things happen to me after I die that I don't believe in, why do people throw stones
at Mormons for believing that their ancestors can
accept baptism after this life?
Sharing the gospel means
at least two
things: the essence of the gospel must be presented in such a way that it may be seen and heard for what it truly is; it must also be presented in such a way that it may be either
accepted or rejected.
Our theology warns us not to
accept Stout's liberal democracy
at face value, and our sense of history suggests that
things are not as bad as MacIntyre and Hauerwas make them out to be.
God hates evil, but He loves free will, and remember, when
things go wrong, the Lord is
at work, and if you are on a plane that goes down, heaven is yours should you be saved, although, if not saved, then that individual has decided not God... for Jesus dying is the only way God will
accept you, and if you reject that, why expect heaven's glory... tisk tisk tisk.
I think if we simply
accepted that this was the best they could do
at the time, then we could focus on more important
things like feeding the poor and supporting orphans.
The statistics are merely sets of data measured in a specific context and
at least the person who posted them had the respect to allow us to make our own interpretation rather than inserting his own opinion which is what Buddha actually wanted people to do... not just
accept things on blind faith but interpret for themselves and experience for themselves.
Third, the minister can arrange for him to get acquainted with an experienced and
accepting AA member who may serve as a bridge to feeling
at home in an AA group [In a study of factors which produce «readiness» for affiliation with AA, Harrison M. Trice discovered that alcoholics with the following characteristics tend to relate effectively to AA: Before contact with AA, they often shared troubles with others, had lost drinking friends, had heard positive
things about AA, had no relative or friend who had quit through willpower.
The
thing is that I think Brene is on to something here about how we need to embrace and
accept our areas of imperfections, because they make us who we really are, and they are not imperfections
at all, but are simply projections on ourselves from what we think other people want us to be.
The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or
accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt
things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can
at least understand what they're saying)
I agree that grace is limitless, but wouldn't someone who has been forgiven (and
accepted) by grace
at least have a strong desire to change the wrong
things in their life?
Accepting this definition, we may infer that «ultimate reality» covers everything that we are all finally obliged to take account of insofar as we exist humanly
at all, whatever other
things we may or may not have to take account of in each leading our own individual human life.
He decided to
accept the pastorate
at Roseville Baptist Church in Johannesburg and opened his church to black people — a huge and precarious
thing to do
at the time.
'' That tells people that I am
at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence» = > It does no such
thing as you can not claim nor do you have evidence as to what is beyond measurement or accountability by
accepted scientific method.
We both
accept, I think, these four related
things about human knowing: (1) sentient experience of «physical
things» is intrinsically infused with objective meaning, purposefulness and value; (2) flowing out, of this and intertwined with it is,
at least for humans, «cognition» of the physical, and moral experience of such value; (3) this moral experience and engagement reveals the spiritual realm as something foundational to and «abstractly distinguishable» from the physical realm — values for Ward, mind for me; and (4) one piece of evidence for making such a distinction is the uniquely «publicly....