Sentences with phrase «accept things come»

Not exact matches

One thing I did initially was that I came in with lower prices and accepted jobs at a loss, so for a couple of years I had some pretty significant losses.

For the most impactful decisions, it is crucial not to apply some model but to accept the ambiguity that comes with doing new things, and to undertake the hard thinking from first principles required to construct the best path forward.

Buying consensus and its evil twin, buying dysfunction, are so pervasive that many B2B professionals have come to accept it as the way things are; the status quo.

When it comes to money, John cautioned business owners against blowing large sums on things they don't need — like expensive websites when a Facebook page would be more strategic — and encouraged them to be just as cautious when thinking about accepting funding.

I hope for two things: 1) that you both hold true to your sincerities and commitments to this cause for the long haul (David already has proven that), 2) that enough people will put their indifferences aside to listen to your messages and accept the inevitable changes that are to come, and quit chasing this impossible infinite growth concept that has blinded so many.

Maybe people have come to accept that student loans are the «thing» to deal with in order to go to college, and many students don't think about the cost of college and choose to deal with the price tag later.

Suffice it to say, opinion is, um, varied when it comes to cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin in particular, as is who supports it and who thinks it's the worst thing to hit trade since COD and damns them as well as uses and accepts them.

those are all parts of life... we deal with them as they come and realize that as tough as those things may be, it is a reality that we must face... we accept that this life will bring us ups and down's... emotions are a wonderful thing and we do not see the need to plead with an unknown deity to get solace for those.

And Atheists views are all over the map when it comes to what they accept as true about those different things.

Come on folks, there is no single standard folks because we all, intentionally or not, pay the money to hear him, see them, or use them rather that take a stand a accept that we may be a little uncomfortable if we do the right thing.

I can't explain how the universe came to be, but I can accept there are things like that I don't know and almost certainly never will know.

Lisa, I did write» It is I who created the destroyer to work havoc» We are talking of the same thing here, accepting Jesus and being saved from the coming wrath of God.

On the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood Web Site, Wayne Grudem warns that if Christians accept egalitarianism, «we will begin to have whole churches who no longer «tremble» at the Word of God (Isaiah 66:2), and who no longer live by «every word that comes from the mouth of God» (Matthew 4:4), but who pick and choose the things they like and the things they don't like in the Bible.»

Yet if he were seriously to accept the attitude of mind which prevails throughout the whole New Testament he might come to see that, although there are many things which appear to deny the love and justice of God in this life, he is quite literally in no position to judge the final issue.

for every priest that violated his vows and the trust of his parishioners there will someday be a reckoning... true the head always suffers for his members that go astray... but the Brits don't understand the Catholic church if they think that we are going to accept practicing man and females gays into the priesthood and except the pope to issue condoms for the prevention of AID they got something else coming... If the Brits want to live in a perverse society where every thing goes that their moral problem!!

Where most Bible translations accurately translate the Greek as saying something along the lines of «The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God,» the NIV reads Calvinistic theology into this verse, and assumes that the natural man does not even have the Spirit, and so translated the verse this way: «The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God.»

The man w / o the Spirit does not accept the things which come from the Spirit of God.

It is as if there is almost three tiers of religion M. Scott Peck speaks about this in some of his writings, the bottom tier are those who blindly accept, the middle level is composed of those who came to reject the things they accepted blindly, and the final tier of enlightenment is those who have gone through all the hard questions, accepting nothing blindly, yet eventually find God.

The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and can not understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.

He claimed things that were considered to be Blasphemy according to Jewish law when he said the Father and I are One and before Abraham was «I Am» He was claiming that He was the «Great I AM» of the Old testament, now come in the flesh and came to pay the price of sin for man, the only acceptable perfect sacrifice, the lamb wihtout blemish, that God would accept because he was indeed God in flesh.

We live in a period of rapid changes of all kinds, and we have come to accept change, development and progress as part of the order of things.

There is only one thing that will forever stand and that is Jesus Christ is real and you should read your Bible especially the book of John and Matthew chapter 25 everything in there is coming to pass and Jesus is getting ready to reveal himself to all the athesist buddhist etc the whole world.He is the King of King and lord of lords, if you think i'm crazy ask him to reveal himself to you if you are serious.Christianty is not a thing it is again a personal relationship with Christ thru his Holly Spirit that if you are 100 % ready to call on and accept, its like your job you go to everyday you open the door and walk thru it, if you didn't you wouldn't know that it was there.

What does not come naturally to us is to accept the suffering that comes to us in life with a measure of grace and hope (even while striving to improve things).

I think the only thing that will really be invitational, missional, relational, and humble, particularly when coming from people who have no personal experience with the issue, will be to accept gay Christians for who they are and accept their choice to be either partnered or celibate.

1 Corinthians 2:14 The natural man does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God.

That our culture and the Court have come to accept the moral liceity of both contraception and sodomy does not show that the «essence» of human sexuality and marriage have changed — indeed, what is essential to something can not change, belonging as it does to the nature of the thing — but that our prevailing sexual culture has grown ever more unnatural, irrational, immoral, and destructive of human flourishing.

Now you tell me... who is the one that really deserves the sympathies of the world: The person who has accepted the reality of the way things are and finds peace in it, or the person chasing a dream that will never come true?

Ms.johnie, sorry i don't accept your demented stories, about our lord, the man came from God performed miracles every day being clean all the time would be nothing idiot, plus one more thing the bible warns us about cretins like YOU!!!

«The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he can not understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.»

«Whoso turns his attention to the bitter strifes of these days and seeks a reason for the troubles that vex public and private life must come to the conclusion that a fruitful cause of the evils which now afflict, as well as those which threaten, us lies in this: that false conclusions concerning divine and human things, which originated in the schoolsof philosophy, have now crept into all the orders of the State, and have been accepted by the common consent of the masses.»

I'm not arguing for the official RCC tradition; my question was why you seem not to be able to accept the things that come after a particular period if apparently, you accept everything that came before?

Oh, I do accept many things that came after the 4th and 5th century, just not all of them.

Santa has promised all of us toys and other good things, but we need to accept that he is real and that he actually does come down a chimney to leave gifts under a tree we put up in the middle of our living room.

«Some of the things that we've just come to accept as everyday ingredients are incredibly nutritious foods — like an orange or a piece of bread,» Jones says.

I just live in the present and accept the situation We're doing well and bigger and better thing are coming but you can't even enjoy the moment.

The biggest advancements in humanity and society have come from people who do not accept the status quo and go out and try new things, people who continually challenge the system and want a change when they see its necessary.

Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the same people who claim to love him would come and be making noise about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.

Every thing must come to an end sometime Wenger does not seem to accept this.

I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.

Few months back I considered myself a rabid AOB sort of a Piers Morgan type, after some time I came to terms with myself that nothing was going to change, it did not matter my tirades or how many comments would post, things at ARSENAL would not change, our destiny is intertwine with AW till the day he decides is enough for him or his Contract is over, for sure not before that, SO there is no point anymore in pointing AW deficiencies nor trashing the Man, he reached the top of his abilities and is consistent with that, making the top 4 reaching the last 16 at the CL and as a BONUS last year maybe this one the FA Cup, reality is he will not reach anything more and we just have to settle and accept (as he has done) our STATUS QUO a good team but not good enough........

I, like many, believe the change will be a positive thing providing the in coming managing establishes budgets and a game plan that the board accept.

just accept it man, there's more important things to worry bout, like That mini solar system that's coming around from behind the Sun... That's going to put us all out of our Arsenal miseries.??

I don't think he will accept but one thing about Giroud is that the club comes first for him.

the team has lost urgency the thing most important to the team of highest caliber, here there is no intention to do things of any kind only flamini intentions are clear to take out opposition player get his customary yellow and monreal's irritation is soon going to hit the papers.Wenger's verdict «at the moment we are a good team good players good atmosphere and players are slowly coming back from injury, monreal is solid CB and he has accepted his role also flamini is taking the opponents nuts to the cleaners which is very viera like quality which i like also Diaby is ready is 2 months cause the surgeon got bored of opening up him lost a screw inside so therefore fourth place is ours».

players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes

As we all know and as been said by many Arsenal fans and critics, Wenger needs to come to terms with the current football price / pay structure and adapt... Accepting that he is wrong and tight and change... I hope for the sake of Arsenal fans all over the world, that Mr Wenger does the right thing and buys a WC striker, ARW midfielder, and CB defender.

The thing about anxiety that I've come to accept is that it really is all about fear.

For the past few weeks we had resigned ourselves to just accepting this was the way we would have to do things until he would hopefully come out of it.

The most important thing in addressing the lifestyle change that comes with a baby is to accept and embrace the fact that everything will change.

This translated in my mind to mean he might not be home for another hour, so when I called McClain, my BFF of 20 + years, to let her know things were starting and that I was alone, I happily accepted her offer to come to the house.