Sentences with phrase «accept things for»

I take life as it comes and accept things for what they are.

You'll be more content if you accept things for what they are.

Some fan's have to accept things for what they are!

The children will eventually learn to accept things for how they are, and will give up asking questions, knowing they won't understand exactly what's going on.

Accepting things for which there is not a single shred of evidence is a hallmark of gullibility.

Not exact matches

Providing an opportunity for employees to safely share when they've seen these things — in a way that is both healthy and helpful for everyone — can counteract a workplace culture that accepts unethical behaviour.»

I have constraints in that I have to meet quarterly numbers, which is a good thing — it's certainly good discipline — but it's a bad thing as well because if I wanted to invest, for instance, a $ 100 million to just make my brand name more accepted for two quarters and in the third quarter I'll get traction, that's not an option I would consider without a lot of pull.

One thing I did initially was that I came in with lower prices and accepted jobs at a loss, so for a couple of years I had some pretty significant losses.

That machine learning — the ability for computers to learn to recognize things or complete tasks without specific programming allowing them to do so — is a transformative technology is generally accepted.

As a student of human behavior who tries to understand why we do the things that we do (often to no avail), I've had to accept that sometimes there just isn't any explanation for why that person just did that really weird thing.

From investigating how their boss» Uber account started accepting rides for a stranger in Russia to their mind - blowing explanations of convoluted tweets, this show teaches listeners about things they never knew in the most engaging and entertaining way possible.

The most wonderful thing about this change in me is that I am able to accept people for who they are now and who they will become, mostly because I've accepted myself — and who I am now and who I will become.

Once everyone affected by the situation has been informed, it's your job to accept responsibility for making things right.

For the most impactful decisions, it is crucial not to apply some model but to accept the ambiguity that comes with doing new things, and to undertake the hard thinking from first principles required to construct the best path forward.

«I accept that a lot of the things I'm fighting for now,» Whande said, «I might not see in my lifetime... Martin Luther King didn't get to see his dream fulfilled, but it was fulfilled.»

The smartwatch doubles as a fitness tracker, can accept phone calls like a Bluetooth headset and displays notifications for things like text messages and emails on its screen.

Apple also reportedly considered a much larger content acquisition last year: A number of news outlets said the company made a takeover bid for content giant Time Warner, which owns HBO and CNN among other things, but the latter decided to accept an offer from telecom player AT&T instead.

Conferences attract plenty of people who are doing the same thing, and once you accept that, you'll probably discover that going to events for entrepreneurs is one of the most helpful things you can do for your business.

In order for bitcoin to be a real currency, Adeney claims, it must be three things: easy and frictionless for trading between people, widely accepted as a legal tender for all debts (both public and private) and stable in terms of value.

As things improve, investors will accept less of a premium for the lower credit issuers.

It's those things that you push for — in which you never accept «no» for an answer.

I hope for two things: 1) that you both hold true to your sincerities and commitments to this cause for the long haul (David already has proven that), 2) that enough people will put their indifferences aside to listen to your messages and accept the inevitable changes that are to come, and quit chasing this impossible infinite growth concept that has blinded so many.

Admittedly, one could make the same argument about gold, but gold has been widely accepted by humankind as a thing of value for more than two - and - a-half thousand years — compared to less than a decade for bitcoin.

It's very new ground, so if I build an app and a wearable device that if I use, I'll monitor my diet better and, therefore, I'll reduce my carbohydrate intake and diabetes will improve, getting our insurance carriers to accept paying for that app or service as a billable thing is non-trivial.

Some of the most accepted advice turned out to be the worst thing for me at the time.

But there is one thing they will not accept: an honest, free market price for gold.

The suggestion that there's such a things as a «demand for money,» comparable to the demand for, say, heating oil, is one that many people find hard to accept.

The company said it was being unfairly singled out for doing things that are «widely accepted as a standard component of online advertising in both the political and commercial arenas.»

For one thing, sellers will be more inclined to accept your offer if you've been «vetted» by a lender.

Another thing: We don't know if Lyft would have accepted an invitation to Trump's advisory board; a Lyft spokesperson did not respond to request for comment on that.

The small but producing mine is being listed by an unknown seller on BitPremier, a so - called bitcoin marketplace for all things luxurious — the advertisement does not confirm if the seller will accept anything else besides bitcoin.

Real things take nowhere that long to circulate and be accepted - Newton's theory of gravity probably took around 50 years (if that) and nowadays it can take just a few weeks / months for newly discovered facts to get around.

If you are willing to do the right thing and accept the results as being right for you (God's will, not yours), then I think you're on the right track.

I personally ping - ponged back and forth between religion and non-religion for a long time before accepting that we humans are truly only guessing at things, and likely inventing things, that are impossible to know for sure.

This means that scientists could claim that anything could be real and could explain all phenomena and the basis for accepting such ideas is because nobody has yet to prove that such a thing exists.

For one thing I can't see why they'd want to stay in a small place where they wouldn't be accepted.

As for the one god being more valid than any of the other thousands, that things you attribute to him (technically to Jesus), still haven't been proven in anything outside of the bible, which no one of a scientific mind can accept as convincing proof.

At this point, it's best for all of us to just grow up and accept that fact that Hollywood is going to make a movie out of every single thing...

Tom tom: I'm sure you accept many things without absolute proof - for example, you probably accept that matter is made of atoms which you can not see; you probably accept that gravity is not going to disappear tomorrow; you probably believe that testing a theory over and over will yield reliable results.

those are all parts of life... we deal with them as they come and realize that as tough as those things may be, it is a reality that we must face... we accept that this life will bring us ups and down's... emotions are a wonderful thing and we do not see the need to plead with an unknown deity to get solace for those.

I have absolutely no problem with Poligomy it is the whole «an Angel gave golden plates (which have never been seen) to Joesph Smith» thing plus the whole women as subserviant to men aspect of LDS and the «inner circle of MEN only in the temples running everything» that make it hard for me to accept.

I guess it could be any of those things but I know him as Jesus and I know you can't logically accept my experience, but suppose you had one for yourself, then another, then another, and so on, could you accept your own experiences?

You could spend all day correlating causation in a classical quantum state with the form and substance of the Holy Spirit yet never publish an accepted study simply because «my god did it» is not a reasonable explanation for things that are not known.

I recognize that is a hard thing to accept for many people, not just myself.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

1 Corinthians 2:14 But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he can not understand them, because they are spiritually appraised.

I don't know what God thinks, but to me if gay marriage is about family life and the possibility of raising children (in other words a desire on the part of gays to be accepted into married life as it exists) then I think it is a good thing for the same reasons that I think hetero families are good and necessary.

«First we affirm that we desire to follow Scripture alone as a rule of faith and religion, without mixing it with any other things which might be devised by the opinion of men apart from the Word of God, and without wishing to accept for our spiritual government any other doctrine than what is conveyed to us by the same Word without addition to diminution, according to the command of our Lord.»

He's best known for writing the Serenity Prayer («God grant me the serenity to accept the things I can not change, the courage to change the things I can...»).

While I fully support (and practice) questioning as a way to learn about the universe around us, questioning for the sake of questioning can sometimes derail the process and bog us down needlessly when certain things have already been fully established or accepted.